Comparison Study of the k − kL − ω and γ − Reθ Transition Model in the Open-Water Performance Prediction of a Rim-Driven Thruster

IF 1.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Bao Liu, M. Vanierschot, F. Buysschaert
{"title":"Comparison Study of the k − kL − ω and γ − Reθ Transition Model in the Open-Water Performance Prediction of a Rim-Driven Thruster","authors":"Bao Liu, M. Vanierschot, F. Buysschaert","doi":"10.3390/ijtpp9010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work examines the capabilities of two transition models implemented in ANSYS Fluent in the open-water performance prediction of a rim-driven thruster (RDT). The adopted models are the three-equation k−kL−ω and the four-equation γ−Reθ models. Both of them are firstly tested on a ducted propeller. The numerical results are compared with available experimental data, and a good correlation is found for both models. The simulations employing two transition models are then carried out on a four-bladed rim-driven thruster model and the results are compared with the SST k−ω turbulence model. It is observed that the streamline patterns on the blade surface are significantly different between the transition and fully turbulent models. The transition models can reveal the laminar region on the blade while the fully turbulent model assumes the boundary layer is entirely turbulent, resulting in a considerable difference in torque prediction. It is noted that unlike the fully turbulent model, the transition models are quite sensitive to the free-stream turbulence quantities such as turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio, as these quantities determine the onset of the transition process. The open-water performance of the studied RDT and resolved flow field are also presented and discussed.","PeriodicalId":36626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp9010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The present work examines the capabilities of two transition models implemented in ANSYS Fluent in the open-water performance prediction of a rim-driven thruster (RDT). The adopted models are the three-equation k−kL−ω and the four-equation γ−Reθ models. Both of them are firstly tested on a ducted propeller. The numerical results are compared with available experimental data, and a good correlation is found for both models. The simulations employing two transition models are then carried out on a four-bladed rim-driven thruster model and the results are compared with the SST k−ω turbulence model. It is observed that the streamline patterns on the blade surface are significantly different between the transition and fully turbulent models. The transition models can reveal the laminar region on the blade while the fully turbulent model assumes the boundary layer is entirely turbulent, resulting in a considerable difference in torque prediction. It is noted that unlike the fully turbulent model, the transition models are quite sensitive to the free-stream turbulence quantities such as turbulent intensity and turbulent viscosity ratio, as these quantities determine the onset of the transition process. The open-water performance of the studied RDT and resolved flow field are also presented and discussed.
轮缘驱动推进器开阔水域性能预测中 k - kL - ω 和 γ - Reθ 过渡模型的比较研究
本研究考察了 ANSYS Fluent 中实施的两个过渡模型在轮缘驱动推进器(RDT)开阔水域性能预测中的能力。采用的模型是三方程 k-kL-ω 模型和四方程 γ-Reθ 模型。这两种模型都首先在管道式螺旋桨上进行了测试。将数值结果与现有的实验数据进行比较,发现两种模型具有良好的相关性。然后在四叶轮缘驱动推进器模型上采用两种过渡模型进行模拟,并将结果与 SST k-ω 湍流模型进行比较。结果表明,过渡模型和全湍流模型的叶片表面流线形态有明显不同。过渡模型可以揭示叶片上的层流区域,而完全湍流模型则假定边界层完全是湍流的,因此在扭矩预测方面存在很大差异。值得注意的是,与完全湍流模型不同,过渡模型对自由流湍流量(如湍流强度和湍流粘度比)相当敏感,因为这些量决定了过渡过程的开始。此外,还介绍并讨论了所研究的 RDT 和解析流场的开阔水域性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
21.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信