Comparative evaluation of efficacy of 2% lidocaine containing adrenaline with and without hyaluronidase in inferior alveolar nerve blocks for patients requiring bilateral mandibular extractions

Q3 Dentistry
Oral Surgery Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1111/ors.12869
Piyush Lunkad, S. Shah, Bhimappa Rudagi, Mili Mehta, Bhushan Bhagat, Smriti Ticku
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of efficacy of 2% lidocaine containing adrenaline with and without hyaluronidase in inferior alveolar nerve blocks for patients requiring bilateral mandibular extractions","authors":"Piyush Lunkad, S. Shah, Bhimappa Rudagi, Mili Mehta, Bhushan Bhagat, Smriti Ticku","doi":"10.1111/ors.12869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate and compare the efficacy of 2% lidocaine containing adrenaline with and without hyaluronidase in inferior alveolar nerve blocks for patients requiring bilateral mandibular extractions.This was the split‐mouth study conducted on 26 patients requiring bilateral mandibular teeth extraction. All the patients were assigned randomly to one of the two groups: (i) 2% lignocaine HCl + 1:2,00,000 adrenaline + hyaluronidase (75 IU) solution will be administered on one side which is the experimental side and (ii) 2% lignocaine HCl + 1:2,00,000 adrenaline solution on the other side is control side. In the first session, the patients randomly received the inferior alveolar nerve block with or without hyaluronidase in one side of the oral cavity. One week later, the same patient received the other technique which was not received in the first session. We also evaluated the onset, duration and need of any supplementary anaesthesia in both the groups.Comparison of VAS score in the control group (2.73 ± 0.724) and experimental group (3 ± 0.693) showed statistically insignificant results (p = 0.177). Whereas the onset of local anaesthesia showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001) mean of control group (2.73 ± 0.47) and experimental group (1.15 ± 0.23). Comparison of duration of anaesthesia showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) with the mean duration of the experimental group being higher (106 ± 7.94) than the control group (86.27 ± 3.90). Comparison for the need for supplementary anaesthesia showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.We conclude that if hyaluronidase is used, better blocks with smaller volumes are produced. LAs with hyaluronidase have been shown to improve the quality and effectiveness of anaesthetic blocks and shorten the time it takes for anaesthesia to begin, accelerate the onset of akinesia and lessen the need for additional anaesthesia. It also increases the duration of anaesthesia.","PeriodicalId":38418,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery","volume":"45 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of 2% lidocaine containing adrenaline with and without hyaluronidase in inferior alveolar nerve blocks for patients requiring bilateral mandibular extractions.This was the split‐mouth study conducted on 26 patients requiring bilateral mandibular teeth extraction. All the patients were assigned randomly to one of the two groups: (i) 2% lignocaine HCl + 1:2,00,000 adrenaline + hyaluronidase (75 IU) solution will be administered on one side which is the experimental side and (ii) 2% lignocaine HCl + 1:2,00,000 adrenaline solution on the other side is control side. In the first session, the patients randomly received the inferior alveolar nerve block with or without hyaluronidase in one side of the oral cavity. One week later, the same patient received the other technique which was not received in the first session. We also evaluated the onset, duration and need of any supplementary anaesthesia in both the groups.Comparison of VAS score in the control group (2.73 ± 0.724) and experimental group (3 ± 0.693) showed statistically insignificant results (p = 0.177). Whereas the onset of local anaesthesia showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001) mean of control group (2.73 ± 0.47) and experimental group (1.15 ± 0.23). Comparison of duration of anaesthesia showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) with the mean duration of the experimental group being higher (106 ± 7.94) than the control group (86.27 ± 3.90). Comparison for the need for supplementary anaesthesia showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups.We conclude that if hyaluronidase is used, better blocks with smaller volumes are produced. LAs with hyaluronidase have been shown to improve the quality and effectiveness of anaesthetic blocks and shorten the time it takes for anaesthesia to begin, accelerate the onset of akinesia and lessen the need for additional anaesthesia. It also increases the duration of anaesthesia.
含肾上腺素的 2% 利多卡因(含或不含透明质酸酶)在下牙槽神经阻滞中对双侧下颌骨拔牙患者疗效的比较评估
评估和比较含肾上腺素的 2% 利多卡因与不含透明质酸酶的下牙槽神经阻滞剂对需要进行双侧下颌拔牙的患者的疗效。所有患者被随机分配到两组中的一组:(i) 2% 盐酸木质素 + 1:2,00,000 肾上腺素 + 透明质酸酶 (75 IU) 溶液注射于一侧,即实验侧;(ii) 2% 盐酸木质素 + 1:2,00,000 肾上腺素溶液注射于另一侧,即对照侧。在第一次治疗中,患者随机在一侧口腔接受含或不含透明质酸酶的下牙槽神经阻滞治疗。一周后,同一患者接受了第一疗程未接受的另一种技术。对照组(2.73 ± 0.724)和实验组(3 ± 0.693)的 VAS 评分比较结果显示差异无统计学意义(P = 0.177)。而局部麻醉的起始时间,对照组(2.73 ± 0.47)和实验组(1.15 ± 0.23)的平均值在统计学上有显著差异(p < 0.001)。麻醉持续时间的比较显示,实验组的平均持续时间(106 ± 7.94)高于对照组(86.27 ± 3.90),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。我们的结论是,如果使用透明质酸酶,就能以较小的体积产生更好的阻滞效果。事实证明,使用透明质酸酶的 LA 可以提高麻醉阻滞的质量和效果,缩短麻醉开始的时间,加快肌无动的发生,减少对额外麻醉的需求。它还能延长麻醉时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral Surgery
Oral Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信