Multiphase friction calculation peculiarities based on models implemented in the "d-Flow" software package

N. O. Matroshilov, A. M. Krylov, M. G. Kozlov, P. A. Lyhin, E. Usov, D. Tailakov, V. Ulyanov
{"title":"Multiphase friction calculation peculiarities based on models implemented in the \"d-Flow\" software package","authors":"N. O. Matroshilov, A. M. Krylov, M. G. Kozlov, P. A. Lyhin, E. Usov, D. Tailakov, V. Ulyanov","doi":"10.31660/0445-0108-2023-6-11-47-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to ensure efficient and safe operation of oil and gas fields, a tool is required to design production wells and surface infrastructure. It is important to take into account the physical processes that occur during production, as well as fluid properties and phase transitions. The \"d-Flow\" software package enables the creation of a comprehensive field model based on geological and field data to calculate hydraulic losses of pipelines and forecast hydrocarbon production. The fluid flow modelling is based on the calculation of multiphase friction with the wall of a well or a pipeline.                The article discusses the implementation of four friction models: the Beggs-Brill model, the Gray model and its modification, and the Mukherjee-Brill model. The purpose of this work is to compare the predictions of friction models with the results obtained using commercial realizations of the same models. The results of the Schlumberger PIPESIM hydraulic simulator calculations were used as a benchmark for comparison with the \"d-Flow\" models. Numerical experiments were conducted to investigate two-phase flow under varying well geometry and flow regimes. The models used were compared, and the results showed that the predicted liquid holdup had an average relative error of 0.06%. In some cases, the error was as low as 0.02%. The predicted cumulative pressure drop in the well did not exceed 0.34% for all considered models. Based on the comparison results, we conclude that the \"d-Flow\" software package is suitable for calculating pressure drop in wells of different geometry and surface networks.","PeriodicalId":240239,"journal":{"name":"Oil and Gas Studies","volume":"46 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and Gas Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2023-6-11-47-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to ensure efficient and safe operation of oil and gas fields, a tool is required to design production wells and surface infrastructure. It is important to take into account the physical processes that occur during production, as well as fluid properties and phase transitions. The "d-Flow" software package enables the creation of a comprehensive field model based on geological and field data to calculate hydraulic losses of pipelines and forecast hydrocarbon production. The fluid flow modelling is based on the calculation of multiphase friction with the wall of a well or a pipeline.                The article discusses the implementation of four friction models: the Beggs-Brill model, the Gray model and its modification, and the Mukherjee-Brill model. The purpose of this work is to compare the predictions of friction models with the results obtained using commercial realizations of the same models. The results of the Schlumberger PIPESIM hydraulic simulator calculations were used as a benchmark for comparison with the "d-Flow" models. Numerical experiments were conducted to investigate two-phase flow under varying well geometry and flow regimes. The models used were compared, and the results showed that the predicted liquid holdup had an average relative error of 0.06%. In some cases, the error was as low as 0.02%. The predicted cumulative pressure drop in the well did not exceed 0.34% for all considered models. Based on the comparison results, we conclude that the "d-Flow" software package is suitable for calculating pressure drop in wells of different geometry and surface networks.
基于 "d-Flow "软件包模型的多相摩擦计算特殊性
为了确保油气田的高效安全运营,需要一种工具来设计生产井和地面基础设施。必须考虑到生产过程中发生的物理过程以及流体特性和相变。d-Flow" 软件包可根据地质和油气田数据创建综合油气田模型,计算管道水力损失并预测碳氢化合物产量。流体流动建模的基础是计算多相与井壁或管道的摩擦力。 文章讨论了四种摩擦模型的实施:Beggs-Brill 模型、Gray 模型及其修改版以及 Mukherjee-Brill 模型。这项工作的目的是将摩擦模型的预测结果与使用相同模型的商业实现所获得的结果进行比较。斯伦贝谢 PIPESIM 水力模拟器的计算结果被用作与 "d-Flow "模型进行比较的基准。进行了数值实验,以研究不同油井几何形状和流态下的两相流动。对所使用的模型进行了比较,结果表明,预测的液持平均相对误差为 0.06%。在某些情况下,误差甚至低至 0.02%。在所有考虑的模型中,预测的井内累积压降不超过 0.34%。根据比较结果,我们得出结论:"d-Flow "软件包适用于计算不同几何形状和表面网络的水井压降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信