Does COVID-19 Vaccination Protect Contact Persons? A Systematic Review

Hygiene Pub Date : 2024-01-09 DOI:10.3390/hygiene4010003
Günter Kampf
{"title":"Does COVID-19 Vaccination Protect Contact Persons? A Systematic Review","authors":"Günter Kampf","doi":"10.3390/hygiene4010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination for contact persons is controversial. Therefore, the aim of this review was to determine whether COVID-19 vaccination provides significant protection for them. A PubMed search was carried out using the terms “unvaccinated vaccinated covid” in combination with “viral load” and “transmission”. Studies were included if they reported original comparative data on the SARS-CoV-2 viral load, duration of SARS-CoV-2 detection, or SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates. A total of 332 articles were identified, of which 68 were included and analyzed. The differences in the viral load were equivocal in 57% of the 35 studies, significantly lower in the vaccinated in 11 studies and in the unvaccinated in 3 studies. The infectious virus levels were significantly lower in the vaccinated in two out of six studies. Virus clearance was significantly faster in vaccinated subjects in two of eight studies (detection of viral RNA) and two of four studies (detection of infectious virus). The secondary attack rates were significantly lower in vaccinated index cases in 6 of 15 studies. The vaccination status of contacts was described in two of the six studies and was 31.8% and 39.9% lower in households with an unvaccinated index case. The inconsistent and variable differences in the viral load, viral clearance and secondary attack rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, especially during the omicron predominance, suggests that COVID-19 vaccination is unlikely to prevent a relevant proportion of transmissions to contact persons, taking into account the relevance of the immunological status of the contact population (vaccination rates and previous infection).","PeriodicalId":513294,"journal":{"name":"Hygiene","volume":"51 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene4010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination for contact persons is controversial. Therefore, the aim of this review was to determine whether COVID-19 vaccination provides significant protection for them. A PubMed search was carried out using the terms “unvaccinated vaccinated covid” in combination with “viral load” and “transmission”. Studies were included if they reported original comparative data on the SARS-CoV-2 viral load, duration of SARS-CoV-2 detection, or SARS-CoV-2 transmission rates. A total of 332 articles were identified, of which 68 were included and analyzed. The differences in the viral load were equivocal in 57% of the 35 studies, significantly lower in the vaccinated in 11 studies and in the unvaccinated in 3 studies. The infectious virus levels were significantly lower in the vaccinated in two out of six studies. Virus clearance was significantly faster in vaccinated subjects in two of eight studies (detection of viral RNA) and two of four studies (detection of infectious virus). The secondary attack rates were significantly lower in vaccinated index cases in 6 of 15 studies. The vaccination status of contacts was described in two of the six studies and was 31.8% and 39.9% lower in households with an unvaccinated index case. The inconsistent and variable differences in the viral load, viral clearance and secondary attack rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, especially during the omicron predominance, suggests that COVID-19 vaccination is unlikely to prevent a relevant proportion of transmissions to contact persons, taking into account the relevance of the immunological status of the contact population (vaccination rates and previous infection).
接种 COVID-19 疫苗能保护接触者吗?系统回顾
接种 COVID-19 疫苗对接触者的保护作用存在争议。因此,本综述旨在确定接种 COVID-19 疫苗是否能为接触者提供显著保护。我们使用 "未接种疫苗接种 COVID"、"病毒载量 "和 "传播 "等词在 PubMed 上进行了搜索。如果研究报告了有关 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量、SARS-CoV-2 检测持续时间或 SARS-CoV-2 传播率的原始比较数据,则会被纳入其中。共找到 332 篇文章,其中 68 篇被纳入并进行了分析。在 35 项研究中,有 57% 的病毒载量差异不明显,在 11 项研究中,接种疫苗者的病毒载量明显较低,在 3 项研究中,未接种疫苗者的病毒载量明显较低。在 6 项研究中,有 2 项研究发现接种疫苗者的传染性病毒水平明显较低。在 8 项研究中的 2 项(检测病毒 RNA)和 4 项研究中的 2 项(检测传染性病毒),接种疫苗的受试者清除病毒的速度明显更快。在 15 项研究中,有 6 项研究发现接种疫苗的指标病例的二次发病率明显较低。在 6 项研究中,有 2 项研究对接触者的疫苗接种情况进行了描述,在有未接种疫苗病例的家庭中,接触者的接种率分别为 31.8%和 39.9%。接种过疫苗和未接种过疫苗的人之间在病毒载量、病毒清除率和二次发病率方面存在不一致和可变的差异,尤其是在奥米克占优势期间,这表明,考虑到接触人群免疫状况的相关性(接种率和既往感染情况),接种 COVID-19 疫苗不太可能预防相关比例的传播给接触者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信