Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals

IF 0.6 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah Isaac, Nicole Acero, Kateryna Kolesnikova, Emily Howell
{"title":"Endometriosis on TikTok: Evaluating social media misinformation and the role of healthcare professionals","authors":"Sarah Isaac, Nicole Acero, Kateryna Kolesnikova, Emily Howell","doi":"10.1177/22840265231220089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TikTok is often the first source teens and young adult patients turn to for medical information, a short-form social media video application known to promote videos with inaccurate information. The primary goal of this study was to characterize popular endometriosis misinformation found on TikTok, with the secondary goal of describing attitudes surrounding endometriosis on TikTok so that physicians can be knowledgeable about the content available on the internet, and be prepared when patients talk about endometriosis misinformation. The top 100 videos under the three most popular endometriosis search terms were assessed for misinformation in four categories: incorrect causes, incorrect symptoms, incorrect treatment, and other incorrect information. Non-English, inaudible, duplicated, or irrelevant videos were excluded from analysis. Videos were analyzed until 100 valid videos were identified in each search term. Metadata was collected, including whether the video was created by a physician or non-physician and attitudes toward endometriosis. Chi squares, Fisher’s Exact Tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests were performed as appropriate. Of total, 298 videos met the eligibility criteria for review. Fifty videos were created by individual physicians and 248 were created by non-physicians. Overall, out of 298 videos, 69 videos (23%) had incorrect or misleading information about causes, treatment, symptoms, or information about endometriosis. Only 1% of the analyzed videos discussed medication management other than COCPs. Nonphysician sources were associated with negative attitudes ( p < 0.003). Nonphysician videos were more likely to contain misinformation in at least one category, compared to physician videos ( p < 0.0008). Despite the greater volume of non-physician videos, those created by physicians were more likely to be shared. Misinformation from non-physician sources was associated with positive/neutral attitudes toward endometriosis and treatment ( p < 0.00002). This study reveals that TikTok hosts a high volume of endometriosis misinformation, especially about endometrosis treatments. Popular TikTok misinformation tends not to reflect traditional misconceptions, but rather modern misinformation trends of holistic health and “wellness.” Physicians should be prepared to have respectful discussions about endometriosis treatments found on TikTok without invalidating the emotions that led patients to seek information on the internet.","PeriodicalId":15725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","volume":"59 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endometriosis and pelvic pain disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22840265231220089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TikTok is often the first source teens and young adult patients turn to for medical information, a short-form social media video application known to promote videos with inaccurate information. The primary goal of this study was to characterize popular endometriosis misinformation found on TikTok, with the secondary goal of describing attitudes surrounding endometriosis on TikTok so that physicians can be knowledgeable about the content available on the internet, and be prepared when patients talk about endometriosis misinformation. The top 100 videos under the three most popular endometriosis search terms were assessed for misinformation in four categories: incorrect causes, incorrect symptoms, incorrect treatment, and other incorrect information. Non-English, inaudible, duplicated, or irrelevant videos were excluded from analysis. Videos were analyzed until 100 valid videos were identified in each search term. Metadata was collected, including whether the video was created by a physician or non-physician and attitudes toward endometriosis. Chi squares, Fisher’s Exact Tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests were performed as appropriate. Of total, 298 videos met the eligibility criteria for review. Fifty videos were created by individual physicians and 248 were created by non-physicians. Overall, out of 298 videos, 69 videos (23%) had incorrect or misleading information about causes, treatment, symptoms, or information about endometriosis. Only 1% of the analyzed videos discussed medication management other than COCPs. Nonphysician sources were associated with negative attitudes ( p < 0.003). Nonphysician videos were more likely to contain misinformation in at least one category, compared to physician videos ( p < 0.0008). Despite the greater volume of non-physician videos, those created by physicians were more likely to be shared. Misinformation from non-physician sources was associated with positive/neutral attitudes toward endometriosis and treatment ( p < 0.00002). This study reveals that TikTok hosts a high volume of endometriosis misinformation, especially about endometrosis treatments. Popular TikTok misinformation tends not to reflect traditional misconceptions, but rather modern misinformation trends of holistic health and “wellness.” Physicians should be prepared to have respectful discussions about endometriosis treatments found on TikTok without invalidating the emotions that led patients to seek information on the internet.
TikTok 上的子宫内膜异位症:评估社交媒体上的错误信息和医疗保健专业人员的作用
TikTok 通常是青少年和年轻成年患者获取医疗信息的第一渠道,众所周知,这种短视频社交媒体应用会推广含有不准确信息的视频。本研究的主要目的是描述 TikTok 上流行的子宫内膜异位症错误信息的特征,其次是描述 TikTok 上围绕子宫内膜异位症的态度,以便医生了解互联网上的内容,并在患者谈论子宫内膜异位症错误信息时有所准备。我们对三个最热门的子宫内膜异位症搜索词下排名前 100 的视频进行了错误信息评估,共分为四类:错误原因、错误症状、错误治疗和其他错误信息。非英语、听不清、重复或无关的视频不在分析之列。对视频进行分析,直到在每个搜索词中找到 100 个有效视频为止。收集的元数据包括视频是由医生制作的还是非医生制作的,以及人们对子宫内膜异位症的态度。根据情况进行卡方检验、费雪精确检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验。共有 298 个视频符合审查资格标准。其中 50 个视频由医生个人制作,248 个由非医生制作。总体而言,在 298 个视频中,有 69 个视频(23%)在病因、治疗、症状或子宫内膜异位症相关信息方面存在错误或误导性信息。在分析的视频中,只有 1%的视频讨论了 COCPs 以外的药物治疗。非医生来源与负面态度相关(P < 0.003)。与医生视频相比,非医生视频更有可能包含至少一个类别的错误信息(p < 0.0008)。尽管非医生视频的数量更大,但医生制作的视频更有可能被分享。非医生来源的错误信息与人们对子宫内膜异位症和治疗的积极/中立态度有关(P < 0.00002)。这项研究表明,TikTok 上有大量子宫内膜异位症的错误信息,尤其是关于子宫内膜异位症治疗的信息。TikTok 上流行的错误信息往往反映的不是传统的错误观念,而是现代整体健康和 "保健 "的错误信息趋势。医生应做好准备,就 TikTok 上发现的子宫内膜异位症治疗方法进行相互尊重的讨论,而不要否定导致患者在互联网上寻求信息的情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信