Virtual consultation (VC) in fertility and obstetrics and gynaecology services: An analysis of patient and clinician satisfaction

A. D'Angelo, Francesca Evans, Jessica Williams, G. Johns, Alka Ahuja
{"title":"Virtual consultation (VC) in fertility and obstetrics and gynaecology services: An analysis of patient and clinician satisfaction","authors":"A. D'Angelo, Francesca Evans, Jessica Williams, G. Johns, Alka Ahuja","doi":"10.1002/rfc2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess patient and clinician satisfaction and identify any differences between the two with the use of video consulting (VC) in the fields of obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) and fertility in Wales.A retrospective electronic survey study.All public hospitals in Wales that used virtual methods for delivery of fertility and/or O&G appointments during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic between August 2020 and March 2022.Patients awaiting an appointment on the National Health Service, who have attended virtual fertility or O&G appointments in Wales, and fertility and O&G clinicians who have conducted appointments virtually.Analysis of patient and clinician responses to a VC satisfaction survey delivered after their consultation taking place between August 2020 and March 2022.Patient and clinician satisfaction rates with the use of virtual consultation in fertility and O&G appointments.In satisfaction data collected from 420 patients and 161 clinicians, 83% of patients and 63% of clinicians reported their VC quality to be ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’. Difficulties when using VC were experienced by a minority of patients (1%–9%) and clinicians (1%–8%) and most patients (52v82%) and clinicians (34%–67%) found several aspects of VC to be ‘very beneficial’. Fertility patients rated their VC experience more positively than O&G patients.Most patients and clinicians were satisfied with their VC experience. Patients were more satisfied with the use of VC than clinicians. Fertility patients were more satisfied with the use of VC than O&G patients.","PeriodicalId":74669,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive, female and child health","volume":"73 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive, female and child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rfc2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess patient and clinician satisfaction and identify any differences between the two with the use of video consulting (VC) in the fields of obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) and fertility in Wales.A retrospective electronic survey study.All public hospitals in Wales that used virtual methods for delivery of fertility and/or O&G appointments during and after the COVID‐19 pandemic between August 2020 and March 2022.Patients awaiting an appointment on the National Health Service, who have attended virtual fertility or O&G appointments in Wales, and fertility and O&G clinicians who have conducted appointments virtually.Analysis of patient and clinician responses to a VC satisfaction survey delivered after their consultation taking place between August 2020 and March 2022.Patient and clinician satisfaction rates with the use of virtual consultation in fertility and O&G appointments.In satisfaction data collected from 420 patients and 161 clinicians, 83% of patients and 63% of clinicians reported their VC quality to be ‘very good’ or ‘excellent’. Difficulties when using VC were experienced by a minority of patients (1%–9%) and clinicians (1%–8%) and most patients (52v82%) and clinicians (34%–67%) found several aspects of VC to be ‘very beneficial’. Fertility patients rated their VC experience more positively than O&G patients.Most patients and clinicians were satisfied with their VC experience. Patients were more satisfied with the use of VC than clinicians. Fertility patients were more satisfied with the use of VC than O&G patients.
生育和妇产科服务中的虚拟会诊(VC):患者和临床医生满意度分析
评估患者和临床医生对威尔士妇产科(O&G)和生育领域使用视频咨询(VC)的满意度,并确定两者之间的差异。在 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 3 月期间,威尔士所有在 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后使用虚拟方法提供生育和/或妇产科预约的公立医院。在威尔士参加过虚拟生育或妇产科预约的等待国民健康服务预约的患者,以及通过虚拟方式进行预约的生育和妇产科临床医生。从 420 名患者和 161 名临床医生处收集的满意度数据显示,83% 的患者和 63% 的临床医生表示虚拟会诊质量 "非常好 "或 "优秀"。少数患者(1%-9%)和临床医生(1%-8%)在使用自愿咨询时遇到困难,大多数患者(52%-82%)和临床医生(34%-67%)认为自愿咨询的几个方面 "非常有益"。大多数患者和临床医生对他们的 VC 体验表示满意。患者比临床医生更满意使用 VC。不孕不育患者比妇产科患者更满意使用 VC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信