{"title":"Object-cause of desire and ontological security: evidence from Serbia's opposition to Kosovo's membership in UNESCO","authors":"M. Vulović, Filip Ejdus","doi":"10.1017/s1752971923000210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The traditional Laing–Giddens paradigm views ontological insecurity as an unusual mental state triggered by critical situations and characterized by feelings of anxiety, disorientation and paralysis. However, theories inspired by Lacan suggest a different perspective, stating that ontological insecurity is not an exception but rather a regular state of mind. Similarly, ontological security is a fantasy stemming from the desire to fill the primordial lack, thus fuelling agency. While these Lacanian interpretations have introduced a fresh viewpoint into Ontological Security Studies (OSS), they have not fully incorporated one of the key concepts from Lacanian psychoanalysis – the object-cause of desire (French: objet petit a) – into international relations theory. In this article, we present a framework of how to conceptualize and empirically study the objects-cause of desire in world politics. Our arguments are exemplified in a case study of Serbia's resistance to Kosovo's UNESCO membership in 2015.","PeriodicalId":504364,"journal":{"name":"International Theory","volume":"3 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1752971923000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The traditional Laing–Giddens paradigm views ontological insecurity as an unusual mental state triggered by critical situations and characterized by feelings of anxiety, disorientation and paralysis. However, theories inspired by Lacan suggest a different perspective, stating that ontological insecurity is not an exception but rather a regular state of mind. Similarly, ontological security is a fantasy stemming from the desire to fill the primordial lack, thus fuelling agency. While these Lacanian interpretations have introduced a fresh viewpoint into Ontological Security Studies (OSS), they have not fully incorporated one of the key concepts from Lacanian psychoanalysis – the object-cause of desire (French: objet petit a) – into international relations theory. In this article, we present a framework of how to conceptualize and empirically study the objects-cause of desire in world politics. Our arguments are exemplified in a case study of Serbia's resistance to Kosovo's UNESCO membership in 2015.
传统的莱恩-吉登斯范式认为,本体论不安全感是一种由危急情况引发的异常心理状态,其特点是焦虑、迷失方向和瘫痪感。然而,受拉康启发的理论却提出了不同的观点,认为本体论不安全感不是一种例外,而是一种正常的心理状态。同样,本体论安全感是一种幻想,源于填补原始匮乏的欲望,从而助长了能动性。虽然这些拉康式解释为本体论安全研究(OSS)引入了新的视角,但它们并未将拉康精神分析学派的一个关键概念--欲望的客体原因(法语:objet petit a)--完全纳入国际关系理论。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个如何将欲望的客体原因概念化并对其进行实证研究的框架。我们的论点以塞尔维亚在 2015 年抵制科索沃加入联合国教科文组织的案例研究为例证。