Student questioning: What does questioning reveal about prior knowledge, historical reasoning and affect?

A. Logtenberg, Gonny Schellings, Carla A. M. van Boxtel, Bernadette van Hout-Wolters
{"title":"Student questioning: What does questioning reveal about prior knowledge, historical reasoning and affect?","authors":"A. Logtenberg, Gonny Schellings, Carla A. M. van Boxtel, Bernadette van Hout-Wolters","doi":"10.52289/hej11.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students ask historical questions when they are engaged in historical reasoning and trying to understand a particular historical phenomenon. Student questioning can be regarded as the engine and a destination of historical reasoning. This study is aimed at deeper insight into thinking processes underlying students’ historical questions using a general model of questioning and a domain-specific model of historical reasoning. Thirty-three secondary school students were instructed to read a text and underline striking text segments. At the point of underlining, students were asked to verbalize their thoughts. In our protocol analysis we focused on the questions students spontaneously asked while verbalizing their prior knowledge, reasoning, and feelings. It appeared that in half of the 251 analyzed fragments (episodes) students verbalized an extent of historical reasoning and expressed feelings. Questions were mostly asked when students expressed a knowledge deficit, but spontaneous questions were also present in episodes with historical reasoning and episodes with affective responses. All components, activating prior knowledge, realizing a knowledge deficit, historical reasoning and experiencing affective thoughts, help students to ask their questions and help them to process the introduction into a historical topic.","PeriodicalId":511679,"journal":{"name":"Historical Encounters: A journal of historical consciousness, historical cultures, and history education","volume":"1 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Encounters: A journal of historical consciousness, historical cultures, and history education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52289/hej11.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students ask historical questions when they are engaged in historical reasoning and trying to understand a particular historical phenomenon. Student questioning can be regarded as the engine and a destination of historical reasoning. This study is aimed at deeper insight into thinking processes underlying students’ historical questions using a general model of questioning and a domain-specific model of historical reasoning. Thirty-three secondary school students were instructed to read a text and underline striking text segments. At the point of underlining, students were asked to verbalize their thoughts. In our protocol analysis we focused on the questions students spontaneously asked while verbalizing their prior knowledge, reasoning, and feelings. It appeared that in half of the 251 analyzed fragments (episodes) students verbalized an extent of historical reasoning and expressed feelings. Questions were mostly asked when students expressed a knowledge deficit, but spontaneous questions were also present in episodes with historical reasoning and episodes with affective responses. All components, activating prior knowledge, realizing a knowledge deficit, historical reasoning and experiencing affective thoughts, help students to ask their questions and help them to process the introduction into a historical topic.
学生提问:提问揭示了什么有关先前知识、历史推理和情感的信息?
学生在进行历史推理,试图理解某一历史现象时,会提出历史问题。学生的提问可以被视为历史推理的动力和归宿。本研究旨在利用一般提问模型和特定领域的历史推理模型,深入探讨学生历史提问背后的思维过程。研究人员指导 33 名中学生阅读课文,并在文中引人注目的片段下划线。在划线处,学生被要求用语言表达他们的想法。在协议分析中,我们重点关注学生在口头表达他们的已有知识、推理和感受时自发提出的问题。在分析的 251 个片段中,有一半的片段(情节)似乎是学生口头表达了一定程度的历史推理和感受。大多数问题是在学生表达知识缺陷时提出的,但在有历史推理的片段和有情感反应的片段中也有自发的问题。激活已有知识、意识到知识不足、历史推理和情感体验等所有要素都有助于学生提出问题,帮助他们处理历史话题的导入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信