Context matters in history textbook studies: A call to address the socio-political landscape of textbook production

Penney Clark, Kristina Llewellyn, Rafael V. Capó García, S. Clifford
{"title":"Context matters in history textbook studies: A call to address the socio-political landscape of textbook production","authors":"Penney Clark, Kristina Llewellyn, Rafael V. Capó García, S. Clifford","doi":"10.52289/hej11.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History textbooks are a tool of nation-building and often the only account of particular events, people and issues to which students will be exposed. This is one reason why it is important to examine, not only their content, but the context of their production. Research attention needs to be directed not only at disentangling the logics of textbook content, a purpose that dominates the field, but also at the social and political contexts of their development, including their production (publishing and authorship) and the processes by which they receive official approval. This work analyzed 100 history textbook studies in order to identify current trends in textbook research. This article focuses on one of the four major findings of the study: textbook studies often focus on the content of the textbook in isolation from the socio-political landscape of textbook production. The socio-political landscape refers, but is not limited to, the influence of local and geopolitics; the influence of the state, evident primarily in the official approval processes employed by governments; the economic dimension and publication parameters; and authorship factors. Among the relatively few studies that address the socio-political landscape, the authors often employ a historiographical or comparative perspective. The historiographical perspective, which is dominant, offers an analysis of textbooks over time in order to reveal both continuities and changes in the historical narratives produced by their authors. One example is a study by Yeow Tong Chia (2013), who examines conceptions of ‘Chineseness’ and China in Ontario high school history curricula and textbooks in the post Second World War to the 1980s period. More broadly, the paper locates the Ontario textbooks in the international context of the western-centric perspectives that were prevalent following the Second World War. The comparative perspective analyzes textbooks across regions in one historical moment. For example, Jason Nicholls (2006) addresses the role of national contexts in determining how the Second World War is portrayed in textbooks found in the United States, Italy, Sweden, Japan, and England.","PeriodicalId":511679,"journal":{"name":"Historical Encounters: A journal of historical consciousness, historical cultures, and history education","volume":"4 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Encounters: A journal of historical consciousness, historical cultures, and history education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52289/hej11.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

History textbooks are a tool of nation-building and often the only account of particular events, people and issues to which students will be exposed. This is one reason why it is important to examine, not only their content, but the context of their production. Research attention needs to be directed not only at disentangling the logics of textbook content, a purpose that dominates the field, but also at the social and political contexts of their development, including their production (publishing and authorship) and the processes by which they receive official approval. This work analyzed 100 history textbook studies in order to identify current trends in textbook research. This article focuses on one of the four major findings of the study: textbook studies often focus on the content of the textbook in isolation from the socio-political landscape of textbook production. The socio-political landscape refers, but is not limited to, the influence of local and geopolitics; the influence of the state, evident primarily in the official approval processes employed by governments; the economic dimension and publication parameters; and authorship factors. Among the relatively few studies that address the socio-political landscape, the authors often employ a historiographical or comparative perspective. The historiographical perspective, which is dominant, offers an analysis of textbooks over time in order to reveal both continuities and changes in the historical narratives produced by their authors. One example is a study by Yeow Tong Chia (2013), who examines conceptions of ‘Chineseness’ and China in Ontario high school history curricula and textbooks in the post Second World War to the 1980s period. More broadly, the paper locates the Ontario textbooks in the international context of the western-centric perspectives that were prevalent following the Second World War. The comparative perspective analyzes textbooks across regions in one historical moment. For example, Jason Nicholls (2006) addresses the role of national contexts in determining how the Second World War is portrayed in textbooks found in the United States, Italy, Sweden, Japan, and England.
历史教科书研究中的背景问题:呼吁解决教科书制作的社会政治问题
历史教科书是国家建设的工具,往往也是学生接触到的特定事件、人物和问题的唯一记 述。这就是为什么不仅要研究教科书的内容,还要研究其编写背景的原因之一。研究不仅要关注教科书内容的逻辑(这是该领域的主要目的),还要关注教科书发展的社会和政治背景,包括其生产(出版和作者)以及获得官方批准的过程。这项工作分析了 100 项历史教科书研究,以确定当前教科书研究的趋势。本文重点论述该研究的四大发现之一:教科书研究往往只关注教科书的内容,而脱离了教科书生产的社会政治环境。社会政治格局指的是但不限于地方和地缘政治的影响;国家的影响,主要体现在政府采用的官方审批程序;经济层面和出版参数;以及作者因素。在相对较少的涉及社会政治格局的研究中,作者通常采用历史学或比较的视角。历史学视角占主导地位,它对教科书进行历时分析,以揭示教科书作者所创作的历史叙事的连续性和变化。其中一个例子是 Yeow Tong Chia(2013 年)的研究,他考察了安大略省高中历史课程和教科书中关于 "中国性 "和中国的概念,时间跨度为第二次世界大战后至 20 世纪 80 年代。更广泛地说,本文将安大略省的教科书置于第二次世界大战后盛行的西方中心主义观点的国际背景下。比较视角分析了同一历史时期不同地区的教科书。例如,Jason Nicholls(2006 年)探讨了美国、意大利、瑞典、日本和英国教科书中如何描绘第二次世界大战的国家背景的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信