The resolution of quadratic inequality problems in mathematics: Discrepancies between thought and action

Surya Sari Faradiba, Alifiani, Nurul Akmal Md Nasir
{"title":"The resolution of quadratic inequality problems in mathematics: Discrepancies between thought and action","authors":"Surya Sari Faradiba, Alifiani, Nurul Akmal Md Nasir","doi":"10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p66-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores the intricate relationship between students' cognitive processes and problem-solving approaches, explicitly focusing on misconceptions in solving quadratic inequalities. This study was conducted among 179 undergraduates in a mathematics education program in Malang, East Java, Indonesia; this mixed-method concurrent explanatory sequential design research employed the DISC questionnaire and quadratic inequality assignments. The DISC questionnaire categorized respondents into Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. Data were generated from these pre-service teacher responses to the questionnaire, task assignment, and follow-up interviews to solicit information. Purposive sampling facilitated in-depth interviews, providing nuanced insights into the interplay between personality types and mathematical misconceptions. The quantitative data analysis results show a significant association between personality type and the type of error experienced by students when completing an open-ended task about quadratic inequalities X2(12) = 26.836, p = 0.008, V = 0.224. Meanwhile, qualitative data analysis findings reveal patterns associating personality types with specific misconceptions. Dominant traits are linked to theoretical misconceptions, while Influence and Conscientiousness traits correspond to conceptual misconceptions. Additionally, Steady traits are associated with classification misconceptions. This study contributes novel perspectives to mathematics education by exploring the influence of personality on mathematical cognition. The aim is to inform tailored teaching strategies for optimized learning outcomes, addressing persistent barriers posed by misconceptions in quadratic inequalities.","PeriodicalId":109878,"journal":{"name":"Infinity Journal","volume":"4 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infinity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i1.p66-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores the intricate relationship between students' cognitive processes and problem-solving approaches, explicitly focusing on misconceptions in solving quadratic inequalities. This study was conducted among 179 undergraduates in a mathematics education program in Malang, East Java, Indonesia; this mixed-method concurrent explanatory sequential design research employed the DISC questionnaire and quadratic inequality assignments. The DISC questionnaire categorized respondents into Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness. Data were generated from these pre-service teacher responses to the questionnaire, task assignment, and follow-up interviews to solicit information. Purposive sampling facilitated in-depth interviews, providing nuanced insights into the interplay between personality types and mathematical misconceptions. The quantitative data analysis results show a significant association between personality type and the type of error experienced by students when completing an open-ended task about quadratic inequalities X2(12) = 26.836, p = 0.008, V = 0.224. Meanwhile, qualitative data analysis findings reveal patterns associating personality types with specific misconceptions. Dominant traits are linked to theoretical misconceptions, while Influence and Conscientiousness traits correspond to conceptual misconceptions. Additionally, Steady traits are associated with classification misconceptions. This study contributes novel perspectives to mathematics education by exploring the influence of personality on mathematical cognition. The aim is to inform tailored teaching strategies for optimized learning outcomes, addressing persistent barriers posed by misconceptions in quadratic inequalities.
数学中二次不等式问题的解决:思想与行动之间的差异
本研究探讨了学生认知过程与解决问题方法之间错综复杂的关系,并明确关注了学生在解二次不等式时的错误认知。本研究的对象是印度尼西亚东爪哇玛琅市数学教育专业的 179 名本科生;这项混合方法并行解释序列设计研究采用了 DISC 问卷和二次不等式作业。DISC 问卷将受访者分为支配型、影响型、稳重型和认真型。数据来源于这些职前教师对问卷的回答、任务分配和后续访谈。有目的的抽样促进了深入访谈,为了解人格类型与数学误解之间的相互作用提供了细致入微的见解。定量数据分析结果显示,在完成关于二次不等式的开放式任务时,学生的人格类型与错误类型之间存在显著关联,X2(12) = 26.836, p = 0.008, V = 0.224。同时,定性数据分析结果揭示了人格类型与特定误解之间的关联模式。支配型特质与理论性误解相关,而影响力和认真型特质则与概念性误解相对应。此外,稳重特质与分类误解相关。本研究通过探索人格对数学认知的影响,为数学教育提供了新的视角。其目的是为优化学习成果提供有针对性的教学策略,解决二次不等式中的误解所造成的长期障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信