Party-System Polarization and Individual Perceptions of Party Differences: Two Divergent Effects on Turnout

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Sigrid Rossteutscher, Lars-Christopher Stövsand
{"title":"Party-System Polarization and Individual Perceptions of Party Differences: Two Divergent Effects on Turnout","authors":"Sigrid Rossteutscher, Lars-Christopher Stövsand","doi":"10.1017/gov.2023.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this article, we argue that party-system polarization and subjective perceptions of ideological party differences are conceptually and empirically distinct phenomena that affect electoral participation differently. Looking at 84 elections worldwide, we show that party-system polarization, and the sharp conflicts associated with it, depresses turnout because many citizens are put off by extreme party positions and unrewarding polemics. By contrast, the individual perception of differences between parties increases turnout because more citizens can find a party that is close to their own position and identify others as being further away. These opposite effects are possible because party-system polarization leads only some individuals to perceive differences between parties but leads others to avoid the emotionalized political arena. Moreover, individuals' ability to recognize differences between parties is not necessarily a consequence of party-system polarization. The contradictory findings in previous research are due to a conceptual and empirical blurring of these two essentially different aspects.","PeriodicalId":47758,"journal":{"name":"Government and Opposition","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government and Opposition","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.43","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we argue that party-system polarization and subjective perceptions of ideological party differences are conceptually and empirically distinct phenomena that affect electoral participation differently. Looking at 84 elections worldwide, we show that party-system polarization, and the sharp conflicts associated with it, depresses turnout because many citizens are put off by extreme party positions and unrewarding polemics. By contrast, the individual perception of differences between parties increases turnout because more citizens can find a party that is close to their own position and identify others as being further away. These opposite effects are possible because party-system polarization leads only some individuals to perceive differences between parties but leads others to avoid the emotionalized political arena. Moreover, individuals' ability to recognize differences between parties is not necessarily a consequence of party-system polarization. The contradictory findings in previous research are due to a conceptual and empirical blurring of these two essentially different aspects.
党派系统两极分化和个人对党派差异的看法:对投票率的两种不同影响
在这篇文章中,我们认为政党制度两极分化和对意识形态政党差异的主观认识是概念上和经验上截然不同的现象,它们对选举参与度的影响也不同。通过观察全球 84 场选举,我们发现,政党体系两极分化以及与之相关的尖锐冲突会降低投票率,因为许多公民会对极端的政党立场和无益的论战望而却步。与此相反,个人对政党间差异的认知会提高投票率,因为更多的公民可以找到与自己立场接近的政党,而认为其他政党与自己的立场相去甚远。之所以会产生这些相反的效果,是因为政党制度的两极分化只导致部分人感知到政党之间的差异,却导致其他人回避情绪化的政治舞台。此外,个人识别党派之间差异的能力并不一定是政党制度极化的结果。以往研究中出现的相互矛盾的结论是由于在概念和经验上模糊了这两个本质上不同的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Government and Opposition
Government and Opposition POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Government and Opposition has been a leading international journal of comparative politics for over 40 years. Its distinctive voice amongst politics journals has ensured a large, worldwide circulation. Government and Opposition"s interests include: - developments in the theory and practice of democracy, including significant elections the evolution of political parties, and the consequences of new political challenges for governments and oppositions - the governance of the global economy and the implications of interdependence worldwide politics - including the politics of the European Union - major issues of public policy, especially from a comparative perspective theoretical and ethical dimensions of political issues and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信