Effect of Plyometrics on Bone Mineral Density in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nathan Rodricks, Stephanie Deccy, Marc Edwin Saint Louis, Daniel Quintero, Jose Ramirez, Kristopher Paultre
{"title":"Effect of Plyometrics on Bone Mineral Density in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Nathan Rodricks, Stephanie Deccy, Marc Edwin Saint Louis, Daniel Quintero, Jose Ramirez, Kristopher Paultre","doi":"10.1249/TJX.0000000000000242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Context Osteoporosis is a chronic bone metabolic disease characterized by decreased bone mass, leading to increased frailty and a subsequent fracture risk. Peak bone mineral density (BMD) is achieved in early adulthood and may be the most important factor leading to the development of osteoporosis in older adults. Objective This study aimed to analyze the effects of plyometrics on BMD in young men and premenopausal women. Design This study used randomized controlled trials found in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL published between January 1, 1990, and November 1, 2022. Keywords included plyometrics, jumping, jump training, bone health, and bone mineral density. Articles were assessed for methodological quality using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 checklist. Eligibility Criteria Randomized controlled trials investigating BMD in healthy premenopausal women and men between the ages of 18 and 60 yr that compared plyometrics with control were included. Study Selection Two reviewers independently screened 553 abstracts. Main Outcome Measures Mean baseline and follow-up dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scores and standard deviations were extracted to calculate the standard mean difference. After extraction, the magnitude of difference between control and treatment groups were analyzed using the Hedges and Olkin method for effect size. Results The 12 included studies had high methodological quality. Of the 12 studies, 10 reported statistically significant increase in BMD at ≥1 site when compared with control. Two studies showed equal improvement when compared with resistance-only training. After analysis, a large positive effect size with strongly positive correlation was seen between plyometrics and lumbar spine BMD. Conclusion Plyometric training is a safe and time-efficient method to improve BMD in premenopausal people 18–65 yr old. Large effect sizes were associated with increased training intensity and lasted months after the intervention was complete. Plyometrics seems to be a comparable alternative to resistance training with respect to bone health.","PeriodicalId":315896,"journal":{"name":"Translational Journal of the ACSM","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Journal of the ACSM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/TJX.0000000000000242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Context Osteoporosis is a chronic bone metabolic disease characterized by decreased bone mass, leading to increased frailty and a subsequent fracture risk. Peak bone mineral density (BMD) is achieved in early adulthood and may be the most important factor leading to the development of osteoporosis in older adults. Objective This study aimed to analyze the effects of plyometrics on BMD in young men and premenopausal women. Design This study used randomized controlled trials found in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL published between January 1, 1990, and November 1, 2022. Keywords included plyometrics, jumping, jump training, bone health, and bone mineral density. Articles were assessed for methodological quality using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials 2010 checklist. Eligibility Criteria Randomized controlled trials investigating BMD in healthy premenopausal women and men between the ages of 18 and 60 yr that compared plyometrics with control were included. Study Selection Two reviewers independently screened 553 abstracts. Main Outcome Measures Mean baseline and follow-up dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scores and standard deviations were extracted to calculate the standard mean difference. After extraction, the magnitude of difference between control and treatment groups were analyzed using the Hedges and Olkin method for effect size. Results The 12 included studies had high methodological quality. Of the 12 studies, 10 reported statistically significant increase in BMD at ≥1 site when compared with control. Two studies showed equal improvement when compared with resistance-only training. After analysis, a large positive effect size with strongly positive correlation was seen between plyometrics and lumbar spine BMD. Conclusion Plyometric training is a safe and time-efficient method to improve BMD in premenopausal people 18–65 yr old. Large effect sizes were associated with increased training intensity and lasted months after the intervention was complete. Plyometrics seems to be a comparable alternative to resistance training with respect to bone health.
负重训练对年轻人骨矿物质密度的影响:系统回顾与元分析
ABSTRACT Context 骨质疏松症是一种慢性骨代谢疾病,其特点是骨量减少,导致身体虚弱和骨折风险增加。骨矿物质密度(BMD)在成年早期达到峰值,可能是导致老年人骨质疏松症的最重要因素。目标 本研究旨在分析有氧运动对年轻男性和绝经前女性骨密度的影响。设计 本研究使用了 1990 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 11 月 1 日期间发表在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 中的随机对照试验。关键词包括负重、跳跃、跳跃训练、骨骼健康和骨矿物质密度。采用《2010 年试验报告综合标准》清单对文章进行方法学质量评估。资格标准 纳入对 18 至 60 岁绝经前健康女性和男性的骨密度进行调查的随机对照试验,这些试验将负重弹跳与对照进行了比较。研究筛选 两名审稿人独立筛选了 553 篇摘要。主要结果测量 提取基线和随访双能 X 射线吸收测量评分和标准差,以计算标准平均差。提取后,采用赫奇斯和奥尔金效应大小法分析对照组和治疗组之间的差异大小。结果 纳入的 12 项研究具有较高的方法学质量。在这 12 项研究中,有 10 项研究报告称,与对照组相比,≥1 个部位的 BMD 有统计学意义的显著增加。两项研究显示,与单纯阻力训练相比,两者的改善效果相当。经过分析发现,负重训练与腰椎 BMD 之间有很大的正效应量,且呈强烈的正相关。结论 负重训练是一种安全、省时的方法,可改善 18-65 岁绝经前人群的 BMD。较大的效果大小与训练强度的增加有关,并在干预结束后持续数月。就骨骼健康而言,负重训练似乎是一种可与阻力训练相媲美的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信