An automatic analysis and quality assurance method for lymphocyte subset identification

MinYang Zhang, YaLi Zhang, JingWen Zhang, JiaLi Zhang, SiYuan Gao, ZeChao Li, KangPei Tao, XiaoDan Liang, JianHua Pan, Min Zhu
{"title":"An automatic analysis and quality assurance method for lymphocyte subset identification","authors":"MinYang Zhang, YaLi Zhang, JingWen Zhang, JiaLi Zhang, SiYuan Gao, ZeChao Li, KangPei Tao, XiaoDan Liang, JianHua Pan, Min Zhu","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2023-1141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives Lymphocyte subsets are the predictors of disease diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Determination of lymphocyte subsets is usually carried out by flow cytometry. Despite recent advances in flow cytometry analysis, most flow cytometry data can be challenging with manual gating, which is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and error-prone. This study aimed to develop an automated method to identify lymphocyte subsets. Methods We propose a knowledge-driven combined with data-driven method which can gate automatically to achieve subset identification. To improve accuracy and stability, we have implemented a Loop Adjustment Gating to optimize the gating result of the lymphocyte population. Furthermore, we have incorporated an anomaly detection mechanism to issue warnings for samples that might not have been successfully analyzed, ensuring the quality of the results. Results The evaluation showed a 99.2 % correlation between our method results and manual analysis with a dataset of 2,000 individual cases from lymphocyte subset assays. Our proposed method attained 97.7 % accuracy for all cases and 100 % for the high-confidence cases. With our automated method, 99.1 % of manual labor can be saved when reviewing only the low-confidence cases, while the average turnaround time required is only 29 s, reducing by 83.7 %. Conclusions Our proposed method can achieve high accuracy in flow cytometry data from lymphocyte subset assays. Additionally, it can save manual labor and reduce the turnaround time, making it have the potential for application in the laboratory.","PeriodicalId":10388,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Lymphocyte subsets are the predictors of disease diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Determination of lymphocyte subsets is usually carried out by flow cytometry. Despite recent advances in flow cytometry analysis, most flow cytometry data can be challenging with manual gating, which is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and error-prone. This study aimed to develop an automated method to identify lymphocyte subsets. Methods We propose a knowledge-driven combined with data-driven method which can gate automatically to achieve subset identification. To improve accuracy and stability, we have implemented a Loop Adjustment Gating to optimize the gating result of the lymphocyte population. Furthermore, we have incorporated an anomaly detection mechanism to issue warnings for samples that might not have been successfully analyzed, ensuring the quality of the results. Results The evaluation showed a 99.2 % correlation between our method results and manual analysis with a dataset of 2,000 individual cases from lymphocyte subset assays. Our proposed method attained 97.7 % accuracy for all cases and 100 % for the high-confidence cases. With our automated method, 99.1 % of manual labor can be saved when reviewing only the low-confidence cases, while the average turnaround time required is only 29 s, reducing by 83.7 %. Conclusions Our proposed method can achieve high accuracy in flow cytometry data from lymphocyte subset assays. Additionally, it can save manual labor and reduce the turnaround time, making it have the potential for application in the laboratory.
淋巴细胞亚群识别的自动分析和质量保证方法
摘要 目的 淋巴细胞亚群是疾病诊断、治疗和预后的预测因子。淋巴细胞亚群的测定通常采用流式细胞术。尽管近年来流式细胞仪分析技术不断进步,但大多数流式细胞仪数据仍需要人工选别,这不仅耗费大量人力、时间,而且容易出错。本研究旨在开发一种自动方法来识别淋巴细胞亚群。方法 我们提出了一种知识驱动与数据驱动相结合的方法,该方法可自动选通,实现亚群识别。为了提高准确性和稳定性,我们采用了循环调整门控,以优化淋巴细胞群的门控结果。此外,我们还加入了异常检测机制,对可能未成功分析的样本发出警告,确保结果的质量。结果 评估结果显示,我们的方法结果与人工分析结果之间的相关性达到 99.2%,数据集包含 2,000 个淋巴细胞子集检测的单个病例。我们提出的方法对所有病例的准确率达到 97.7%,对高置信度病例的准确率达到 100%。使用我们的自动化方法,仅审查低置信度病例就可节省 99.1% 的人工,而平均周转时间仅需 29 秒,减少了 83.7%。结论 我们提出的方法可实现淋巴细胞亚群检测流式细胞仪数据的高准确性。此外,它还能节省人工劳动,缩短周转时间,因此有可能在实验室中得到应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信