Curbing myopic R&D behavior: How private meetings serve as a channel

IF 5.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
{"title":"Curbing myopic R&D behavior: How private meetings serve as a channel","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2024.101326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study considers whether investor-manager private meetings serve as a potential channel to detect and restrain corporate myopic R&amp;D behavior in firms subject to earnings pressure. To do so, we exploit a unique dataset of corporate site visits, a particular form of private meetings. Our results indicate that the myopic R&amp;D behavior of firms under earnings pressure is significantly lower when the firm hosts more institutional investors’ site visits. To further tease out the underlying mechanisms, we conduct cross-sectional analyses and find that the constraining effect of site visits is greater when there is more need for monitoring by institutional investors, i.e., when the information environment is weak and product market competition is low. Further, this monitoring effect is stronger when more questions are asked about R&amp;D during the site visit, when the site visit involves more than one institutional investor, and when the site visit occurs earlier in the fiscal year. The main findings are robust to alternative model specifications, estimation approaches, and endogeneity issues. Overall, our evidence suggests that site visits cannot only reduce information asymmetry, but they have an important monitoring role as well.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47996,"journal":{"name":"British Accounting Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089083892400026X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study considers whether investor-manager private meetings serve as a potential channel to detect and restrain corporate myopic R&D behavior in firms subject to earnings pressure. To do so, we exploit a unique dataset of corporate site visits, a particular form of private meetings. Our results indicate that the myopic R&D behavior of firms under earnings pressure is significantly lower when the firm hosts more institutional investors’ site visits. To further tease out the underlying mechanisms, we conduct cross-sectional analyses and find that the constraining effect of site visits is greater when there is more need for monitoring by institutional investors, i.e., when the information environment is weak and product market competition is low. Further, this monitoring effect is stronger when more questions are asked about R&D during the site visit, when the site visit involves more than one institutional investor, and when the site visit occurs earlier in the fiscal year. The main findings are robust to alternative model specifications, estimation approaches, and endogeneity issues. Overall, our evidence suggests that site visits cannot only reduce information asymmetry, but they have an important monitoring role as well.
遏制近视研发行为:私人会议如何发挥渠道作用
本研究探讨了投资者与经理人之间的私下会谈是否可以作为一种潜在渠道,用于发现和抑制企业在面对盈利压力时的近视研发行为。为此,我们利用了一个独特的企业实地考察数据集,这是私人会议的一种特殊形式。我们的研究结果表明,当企业接待更多机构投资者的实地考察时,盈利压力下企业的近视研发行为会明显降低。为了进一步揭示其内在机制,我们进行了横截面分析,发现当企业更需要机构投资者的监督时,即信息环境薄弱、产品市场竞争程度低时,实地考察的约束效应会更大。此外,当实地考察中提出更多有关研发的问题时,当实地考察涉及不止一个机构投资者时,当实地考察发生在财政年度的早期时,这种监督效应会更强。主要研究结果对其他模型规格、估计方法和内生性问题都是稳健的。总之,我们的证据表明,实地考察不仅能减少信息不对称,还能起到重要的监督作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Accounting Review
British Accounting Review BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: The British Accounting Review*is pleased to publish original scholarly papers across the whole spectrum of accounting and finance. The journal is eclectic and pluralistic and contributions are welcomed across a wide range of research methodologies (e.g. analytical, archival, experimental, survey and qualitative case methods) and topics (e.g. financial accounting, management accounting, finance and financial management, auditing, public sector accounting, social and environmental accounting; accounting education and accounting history), evidence from UK and non-UK sources are equally acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信