Regulating antimicrobial use within hospitals: A qualitative study

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jennifer Broom , Alex Broom , Katherine Kenny , Pamela Konecny , Jeffrey J. Post
{"title":"Regulating antimicrobial use within hospitals: A qualitative study","authors":"Jennifer Broom ,&nbsp;Alex Broom ,&nbsp;Katherine Kenny ,&nbsp;Pamela Konecny ,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Post","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2023.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine how regulatory structures and processes focused on antimicrobial stewardship and antimicrobial resistance are experienced by hospital managers and clinicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-two hospital managers and clinicians working within accreditation and antimicrobial stewardship teams in three Australian hospitals participated in individual in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thematic analysis revealed participants’ experiences of hospital antimicrobial regulation and their perceptions of what would be required for meaningful antimicrobial optimisation.</p><p><strong>Theme 1: Experience of regulation of antimicrobials within hospitals:</strong> Participants described an increased profile of antimicrobial resistance with inclusion in regulatory requirements, but also the risks of bureaucratic manoeuvring to meet standards rather than governance-inducing systemic changes.</p><p><strong>Theme 2: Growth of accreditation processes and hospitals over time:</strong> Both regulatory requirements and hospitals were described as evolving over time, each manoeuvring in response to each other (e.g. development of short notice accreditation).</p><p><strong>Theme 3: Perceived requirements for change:</strong> Participants perceived a need for top-down buy-in, resource prioritisation, complex understanding of power and influence on clinician behaviour, and a critical need for medical engagement.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study around antimicrobials shows the tension and dynamic relationship between regulatory processes and hospital responses, bringing to light the enduring balance of a system that positions itself to meet regulatory requirements and emerging “demands”, without necessarily addressing the key underlying concerns. Antimicrobial resistance-related solutions are perceived as likely to require further resourcing and buy-in across multiple levels, engagement across professional streams and require strategies that consider complex systems change in order for regulatory structures to have potency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45006,"journal":{"name":"Infection Disease & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045123001128/pdfft?md5=aee2bfbb28291422ffebf148af8d687c&pid=1-s2.0-S2468045123001128-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Disease & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468045123001128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine how regulatory structures and processes focused on antimicrobial stewardship and antimicrobial resistance are experienced by hospital managers and clinicians.

Methods

Forty-two hospital managers and clinicians working within accreditation and antimicrobial stewardship teams in three Australian hospitals participated in individual in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis was performed.

Results

Thematic analysis revealed participants’ experiences of hospital antimicrobial regulation and their perceptions of what would be required for meaningful antimicrobial optimisation.

Theme 1: Experience of regulation of antimicrobials within hospitals: Participants described an increased profile of antimicrobial resistance with inclusion in regulatory requirements, but also the risks of bureaucratic manoeuvring to meet standards rather than governance-inducing systemic changes.

Theme 2: Growth of accreditation processes and hospitals over time: Both regulatory requirements and hospitals were described as evolving over time, each manoeuvring in response to each other (e.g. development of short notice accreditation).

Theme 3: Perceived requirements for change: Participants perceived a need for top-down buy-in, resource prioritisation, complex understanding of power and influence on clinician behaviour, and a critical need for medical engagement.

Conclusions

This study around antimicrobials shows the tension and dynamic relationship between regulatory processes and hospital responses, bringing to light the enduring balance of a system that positions itself to meet regulatory requirements and emerging “demands”, without necessarily addressing the key underlying concerns. Antimicrobial resistance-related solutions are perceived as likely to require further resourcing and buy-in across multiple levels, engagement across professional streams and require strategies that consider complex systems change in order for regulatory structures to have potency.

规范医院内抗菌药物的使用:定性研究。
目的研究医院管理人员和临床医生如何体验以抗菌药物管理和抗菌药物耐药性为重点的监管结构和流程:澳大利亚三家医院的 42 名医院管理人员和抗菌药物管理团队的临床医生参加了个人深度访谈。结果主题分析揭示了参与者在医院抗菌药物监管方面的经验,以及他们对有意义的抗菌药物优化所需条件的看法。主题 1:医院抗菌药物监管经验:与会者描述了抗菌药物耐药性问题在纳入监管要求后的发展情况,同时也描述了为达到标准而进行官僚操纵的风险,而不是由治理引发的系统性变革。主题 2:随着时间的推移,评审程序和医院都在增长:监管要求和医院都被描述为随着时间的推移而不断演变,各自都在应对对方(例如,短时间内通过评审的发展)。主题 3:对变革的要求:参与者认为需要自上而下的认同、资源优先化、对权力的复杂理解和对临床医生行为的影响,以及医疗参与的关键需求:这项关于抗菌药物的研究显示了监管程序与医院应对措施之间的紧张关系和动态关系,揭示了一个系统在满足监管要求和新出现的 "需求 "的同时,并不一定能解决关键的根本问题的持久平衡。与抗菌药耐药性相关的解决方案被认为可能需要进一步的资源配置和多层次的支持,需要各专业领域的参与,还需要考虑复杂系统变化的战略,以便使监管结构具有效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Disease & Health
Infection Disease & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The journal aims to be a platform for the publication and dissemination of knowledge in the area of infection and disease causing infection in humans. The journal is quarterly and publishes research, reviews, concise communications, commentary and other articles concerned with infection and disease affecting the health of an individual, organisation or population. The original and important articles in the journal investigate, report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonoses; and vaccination related to disease in human health. Infection, Disease & Health provides a platform for the publication and dissemination of original knowledge at the nexus of the areas infection, Disease and health in a One Health context. One Health recognizes that the health of people is connected to the health of animals and the environment. One Health encourages and advances the collaborative efforts of multiple disciplines-working locally, nationally, and globally-to achieve the best health for people, animals, and our environment. This approach is fundamental because 6 out of every 10 infectious diseases in humans are zoonotic, or spread from animals. We would be expected to report or discuss infection prevention and control; clinical, social, epidemiological or public health aspects of infectious disease; policy and planning for the control of infections; zoonosis; and vaccination related to disease in human health. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in this ever-changing field. The audience of the journal includes researchers, clinicians, health workers and public policy professionals concerned with infection, disease and health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信