Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized open-label non-inferiority trial.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Renee J C van den Broek, Jonne M C Postema, Joseph S H A Koopman, Charles C van Rossem, Jules R Olsthoorn, Thomas J van Brakel, Saskia Houterman, R Arthur Bouwman, Barbara Versyck
{"title":"Continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized open-label non-inferiority trial.","authors":"Renee J C van den Broek, Jonne M C Postema, Joseph S H A Koopman, Charles C van Rossem, Jules R Olsthoorn, Thomas J van Brakel, Saskia Houterman, R Arthur Bouwman, Barbara Versyck","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-105047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The evolving surgical techniques in thoracoscopic surgery necessitate the exploration of anesthesiological techniques. This study aimed to investigate whether incorporating a continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block into a multimodal analgesia regimen is non-inferior to continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in terms of quality of postoperative recovery for patients undergoing elective unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label non-inferiority trial between July 2020 and December 2022. Ninety patients were randomly assigned to receive either continuous ESP block or TEA. The primary outcome parameter was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, measured before surgery as a baseline and on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. Secondary outcome parameters included pain scores, length of hospital stay, morphine consumption, nausea and vomiting, itching, speed of mobilization, and urinary catheterization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the primary outcome showed a mean QoR-15 difference between the groups ESP block versus TEA of 1 (95% CI -9 to -12, p=0.79) on day 0, -1 (95% CI -11 to -8, p=0.81) on day 1 and -2 (95% CI -14 to -11, p=0.79) on day 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The continuous ESP block is non-inferior to TEA in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Dutch Trial Register (NL6433).</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-105047","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The evolving surgical techniques in thoracoscopic surgery necessitate the exploration of anesthesiological techniques. This study aimed to investigate whether incorporating a continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block into a multimodal analgesia regimen is non-inferior to continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in terms of quality of postoperative recovery for patients undergoing elective unilateral video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label non-inferiority trial between July 2020 and December 2022. Ninety patients were randomly assigned to receive either continuous ESP block or TEA. The primary outcome parameter was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, measured before surgery as a baseline and on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2. Secondary outcome parameters included pain scores, length of hospital stay, morphine consumption, nausea and vomiting, itching, speed of mobilization, and urinary catheterization.

Results: Analysis of the primary outcome showed a mean QoR-15 difference between the groups ESP block versus TEA of 1 (95% CI -9 to -12, p=0.79) on day 0, -1 (95% CI -11 to -8, p=0.81) on day 1 and -2 (95% CI -14 to -11, p=0.79) on day 2.

Conclusions: The continuous ESP block is non-inferior to TEA in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Trial registration number: Dutch Trial Register (NL6433).

视频辅助胸腔镜手术中的持续竖脊肌平面阻滞与胸硬膜外镇痛:一项前瞻性随机开放标签非劣效性试验。
背景和目的:随着胸腔镜手术技术的不断发展,有必要对麻醉技术进行探索。本研究旨在探究在多模式镇痛方案中纳入连续性竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞是否在择期单侧视频辅助胸腔镜手术患者的术后恢复质量方面不劣于连续性胸硬膜外镇痛(TEA).方法:我们在 2020 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月期间开展了一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签的非劣效性试验。90名患者被随机分配接受连续ESP阻滞或TEA。主要结果参数是恢复质量-15(QoR-15)评分,以术前和术后第0、1、2天为基线进行测量。次要结果参数包括疼痛评分、住院时间、吗啡消耗量、恶心和呕吐、瘙痒、活动速度和导尿:主要结果分析显示,ESP阻滞组与TEA组之间的平均QoR-15差异为:第0天1(95% CI -9至-12,P=0.79),第1天-1(95% CI -11至-8,P=0.81),第2天-2(95% CI -14至-11,P=0.79):结论:在视频辅助胸腔镜手术中,连续ESP阻滞不劣于TEA:荷兰试验注册(NL6433)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信