A comparative study of enriched computational homogenization schemes applied to two-dimensional pattern-transforming elastomeric mechanical metamaterials

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
S. O. Sperling, T. Guo, R. H. J. Peerlings, V. G. Kouznetsova, M. G. D. Geers, O. Rokoš
{"title":"A comparative study of enriched computational homogenization schemes applied to two-dimensional pattern-transforming elastomeric mechanical metamaterials","authors":"S. O. Sperling, T. Guo, R. H. J. Peerlings, V. G. Kouznetsova, M. G. D. Geers, O. Rokoš","doi":"10.1007/s00466-023-02428-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Elastomeric mechanical metamaterials exhibit unconventional behaviour, emerging from their microstructures often deforming in a highly nonlinear and unstable manner. Such microstructural pattern transformations lead to non-local behaviour and induce abrupt changes in the effective properties, beneficial for engineering applications. To avoid expensive simulations fully resolving the underlying microstructure, homogenization methods are employed. In this contribution, a systematic comparative study is performed, assessing the predictive capability of several computational homogenization schemes in the realm of two-dimensional elastomeric metamaterials with a square stacking of circular holes. In particular, classical first-order and two enriched schemes of second-order and micromorphic cmoputational homogenziation type are compared with ensemble-averaged full direct numerical simulations on three examples: uniform compression and bending of an infinite specimen, and compression of a finite specimen. It is shown that although the second-order scheme provides good qualitative predictions, it fails in accurately capturing bifurcation strains and slightly over-predicts the homogenized response. The micromorphic method provides the most accurate prediction for tested examples, although soft boundary layers induce large errors at small scale ratios. The first-order scheme yields good predictions for high separations of scales, but suffers from convergence issues, especially when localization occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55248,"journal":{"name":"Computational Mechanics","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-023-02428-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elastomeric mechanical metamaterials exhibit unconventional behaviour, emerging from their microstructures often deforming in a highly nonlinear and unstable manner. Such microstructural pattern transformations lead to non-local behaviour and induce abrupt changes in the effective properties, beneficial for engineering applications. To avoid expensive simulations fully resolving the underlying microstructure, homogenization methods are employed. In this contribution, a systematic comparative study is performed, assessing the predictive capability of several computational homogenization schemes in the realm of two-dimensional elastomeric metamaterials with a square stacking of circular holes. In particular, classical first-order and two enriched schemes of second-order and micromorphic cmoputational homogenziation type are compared with ensemble-averaged full direct numerical simulations on three examples: uniform compression and bending of an infinite specimen, and compression of a finite specimen. It is shown that although the second-order scheme provides good qualitative predictions, it fails in accurately capturing bifurcation strains and slightly over-predicts the homogenized response. The micromorphic method provides the most accurate prediction for tested examples, although soft boundary layers induce large errors at small scale ratios. The first-order scheme yields good predictions for high separations of scales, but suffers from convergence issues, especially when localization occurs.

Abstract Image

应用于二维模式转换弹性机械超材料的丰富计算均质化方案比较研究
弹性机械超材料表现出非常规行为,其微结构经常以高度非线性和不稳定的方式变形。这种微结构模式的转变会导致非局部行为,并引起有效特性的突然变化,有利于工程应用。为了避免昂贵的模拟来完全解析底层微观结构,我们采用了均质化方法。在本文中,我们进行了一项系统的比较研究,评估了几种计算均质化方案在具有方形堆叠圆孔的二维弹性超材料领域的预测能力。特别是,在三个例子(无限试样的均匀压缩和弯曲,以及有限试样的压缩)中,将经典的一阶方案和两种丰富的二阶方案以及微形态 cmoputational 均质类型与集合平均全直接数值模拟进行了比较。结果表明,虽然二阶方案提供了良好的定性预测,但它无法准确捕捉分岔应变,对均质化响应的预测略微过高。微形态方法为测试实例提供了最准确的预测,尽管软边界层在小比例时会引起较大误差。一阶方案对高尺度分离产生了良好的预测,但存在收敛问题,特别是在发生局部化时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Mechanics
Computational Mechanics 物理-力学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The journal reports original research of scholarly value in computational engineering and sciences. It focuses on areas that involve and enrich the application of mechanics, mathematics and numerical methods. It covers new methods and computationally-challenging technologies. Areas covered include method development in solid, fluid mechanics and materials simulations with application to biomechanics and mechanics in medicine, multiphysics, fracture mechanics, multiscale mechanics, particle and meshfree methods. Additionally, manuscripts including simulation and method development of synthesis of material systems are encouraged. Manuscripts reporting results obtained with established methods, unless they involve challenging computations, and manuscripts that report computations using commercial software packages are not encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信