Psychometric Evaluation of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale in a Middle Eastern Heart Failure Population.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000001074
Angela R Massouh, Melissa Makhoul, Samar Noureddine, Corrine Y Jurgens
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale in a Middle Eastern Heart Failure Population.","authors":"Angela R Massouh, Melissa Makhoul, Samar Noureddine, Corrine Y Jurgens","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS) is an 18-item instrument used to assess how bothersome are common signs and symptoms of heart failure (HF). To date, the psychometric properties of the HFSPS have been tested in American, Italian, and Japanese samples.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the HFSPS in a population of Lebanese patients living with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rigorous translation and back-translation process was performed. Cultural appropriateness ratings were assessed by an expert panel. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to confirm construct validity, whereas an independent t test using the Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire's scores was conducted to confirm convergent validity. Pearson correlation was performed to confirm discriminant validity using the Self-Care in HF Index Management subscale, whereas predictive validity was evaluated using the Control Attitudes Scale-Revised. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach α .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 patients (mean age, 63.66 ± 10.55 years; 69.7% male) were included. A series of exploratory factor analyses was conducted and resulted in a 4-factor model. Cronbach α was 0.869. Convergent (high correlation with total Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire; r = 0.762, P < .0001), discriminant (no correlation with self-care management; r = 0.180, P = .078), and predictive (significant correlation with the Control Attitudes Scale-Revised; r = -0.523, P < .0001) validity was supported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability and validity of the HFSPS were supportive in this Middle Eastern sample. The HFSPS can be used to assess how bothersome HF symptoms are to improve their management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS) is an 18-item instrument used to assess how bothersome are common signs and symptoms of heart failure (HF). To date, the psychometric properties of the HFSPS have been tested in American, Italian, and Japanese samples.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the HFSPS in a population of Lebanese patients living with HF.

Methods: A rigorous translation and back-translation process was performed. Cultural appropriateness ratings were assessed by an expert panel. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to confirm construct validity, whereas an independent t test using the Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire's scores was conducted to confirm convergent validity. Pearson correlation was performed to confirm discriminant validity using the Self-Care in HF Index Management subscale, whereas predictive validity was evaluated using the Control Attitudes Scale-Revised. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach α .

Results: A total of 109 patients (mean age, 63.66 ± 10.55 years; 69.7% male) were included. A series of exploratory factor analyses was conducted and resulted in a 4-factor model. Cronbach α was 0.869. Convergent (high correlation with total Minnesota Living With HF Questionnaire; r = 0.762, P < .0001), discriminant (no correlation with self-care management; r = 0.180, P = .078), and predictive (significant correlation with the Control Attitudes Scale-Revised; r = -0.523, P < .0001) validity was supported.

Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the HFSPS were supportive in this Middle Eastern sample. The HFSPS can be used to assess how bothersome HF symptoms are to improve their management.

中东心力衰竭人群心力衰竭躯体感知量表的心理计量学评估
背景:心力衰竭躯体感觉量表(HFSPS)是一种包含18个项目的工具,用于评估心力衰竭(HF)的常见体征和症状的困扰程度。迄今为止,HFSPS 的心理测量特性已在美国、意大利和日本样本中进行了测试:本研究旨在评估 HFSPS 在黎巴嫩心力衰竭患者中的有效性和可靠性:方法:进行了严格的翻译和回译过程。由专家小组对文化适宜性评分进行评估。进行了探索性因子分析以确认构建效度,同时使用明尼苏达高频生活调查问卷的得分进行了独立 t 检验以确认收敛效度。使用 "HF 指数管理中的自我护理 "分量表进行了皮尔逊相关性分析,以确认判别效度;使用 "控制态度量表-修订版 "评估了预测效度。内部一致性可靠性采用 Cronbach α 进行评估:共纳入 109 名患者(平均年龄为 63.66 ± 10.55 岁;69.7% 为男性)。进行了一系列探索性因子分析,得出了一个 4 因子模型。Cronbach α为0.869。该模型具有收敛性(与明尼苏达高频生活调查问卷相关性高;r = 0.762,P < .0001)、区分性(与自我护理管理无相关性;r = 0.180,P = .078)和预测性(与控制态度量表-修订版显著相关;r = -0.523,P < .0001):结论:在这个中东样本中,HFSPS 的信度和效度都得到了支持。HFSPS可用于评估高血压症状的困扰程度,以改善其管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信