Predictors of rewarded caregiving for family caregivers of person with dementia: A longitudinal study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-11 DOI:10.1002/nur.22370
Hsin-Yun Liu, Li-Min Kuo, Yea-Ing L Shyu, Wen-Chuin Hsu
{"title":"Predictors of rewarded caregiving for family caregivers of person with dementia: A longitudinal study.","authors":"Hsin-Yun Liu, Li-Min Kuo, Yea-Ing L Shyu, Wen-Chuin Hsu","doi":"10.1002/nur.22370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to explore variables associated with rewarded caregiving for family caregivers of persons living with dementia over a 2-year follow-up. This correlational longitudinal study was comprised of 200 family caregivers of persons living with dementia from neurological clinics of a medical center was conducted. Dichotomous scoring of the Rewards of Caregiving Scale of the Family Caregiving Inventory resulted in 61 (30.5%) caregivers being assigned to the well-rewarded group and 139 (69.5%) to the poorly reward group at baseline. Variables included characteristics of family caregivers and their care receivers and assessments with validated scales of caregivers' social support and dyadic relational variables of mutuality, preparedness, and balance. Analysis at baseline showed significant predictors of well-rewarded family caregivers were being an adult child of the care receiver, having a high perceived level mutuality and having a high perceived level of preparedness. These three variables remained as significant predictors at the 1- and 2-year follow-up. Caregivers with high levels of perceived mutuality and preparedness at 2-years were seven times more likely to perceive themselves as well-rewarded. Based on the findings, developing clinical interventions that focus on promoting mutuality and preparedness for family caregivers of persons with dementia could allow caregivers to perceive their role as rewarding. Attention should also be paid to the relationship between the caregiver and care receiver to enhance the family caregiver's feelings of mutuality and preparedness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore variables associated with rewarded caregiving for family caregivers of persons living with dementia over a 2-year follow-up. This correlational longitudinal study was comprised of 200 family caregivers of persons living with dementia from neurological clinics of a medical center was conducted. Dichotomous scoring of the Rewards of Caregiving Scale of the Family Caregiving Inventory resulted in 61 (30.5%) caregivers being assigned to the well-rewarded group and 139 (69.5%) to the poorly reward group at baseline. Variables included characteristics of family caregivers and their care receivers and assessments with validated scales of caregivers' social support and dyadic relational variables of mutuality, preparedness, and balance. Analysis at baseline showed significant predictors of well-rewarded family caregivers were being an adult child of the care receiver, having a high perceived level mutuality and having a high perceived level of preparedness. These three variables remained as significant predictors at the 1- and 2-year follow-up. Caregivers with high levels of perceived mutuality and preparedness at 2-years were seven times more likely to perceive themselves as well-rewarded. Based on the findings, developing clinical interventions that focus on promoting mutuality and preparedness for family caregivers of persons with dementia could allow caregivers to perceive their role as rewarding. Attention should also be paid to the relationship between the caregiver and care receiver to enhance the family caregiver's feelings of mutuality and preparedness.

痴呆症患者家庭照护者有偿照护的预测因素:纵向研究
本研究的目的是探讨与痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者在两年的随访过程中提供有回报的照顾有关的变量。这项相关纵向研究由一家医疗中心神经科诊所的 200 名痴呆症患者家庭护理人员组成。对家庭照护量表中的照护奖励量表进行二分法评分后,61 名照护者(30.5%)被分配到奖励良好组,139 名照护者(69.5%)被分配到奖励较差组。变量包括家庭照顾者及其照顾对象的特征,以及对照顾者的社会支持和相互性、准备性和平衡性等二元关系变量的有效量表评估。基线分析表明,作为接受照护者的成年子女、具有较高的相互感知水平和较高的准备感知水平是家庭照护者获得良好回报的重要预测因素。在 1 年和 2 年的随访中,这三个变量仍然是重要的预测因素。在 2 年的随访中,相互感知程度高和准备程度高的照顾者认为自己得到良好回报的可能性要高出 7 倍。根据研究结果,制定临床干预措施,重点促进痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的相互性和准备性,可以让照顾者认为他们的角色是有回报的。此外,还应关注照护者和接受照护者之间的关系,以增强家庭照护者的相互感和准备感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信