Rocuronium Dosing by Ideal vs Total Body Weight in Obesity: A Prospective, Observational Non-inferiority Study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Marc McDowell, Amanda Lewandowski, Dharati Desai, Stephany Nunez Cruz, Nicole Glowacki, Alaa Sulh, Michael Cirone, Nadine Lomotan, Mary Hormese
{"title":"Rocuronium Dosing by Ideal vs Total Body Weight in Obesity: A Prospective, Observational Non-inferiority Study.","authors":"Marc McDowell, Amanda Lewandowski, Dharati Desai, Stephany Nunez Cruz, Nicole Glowacki, Alaa Sulh, Michael Cirone, Nadine Lomotan, Mary Hormese","doi":"10.5811/westjem.60713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing adequate paralysis and appropriate sedation is challenging in patients with obesity during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Pharmacokinetic parameters play an important role in dosing of rocuronium due to low lipophilicity. Rocuronium may be dosed based on ideal body weight (IBW). Current guidelines do not offer recommendations for dosing in the setting of obesity. Dosing depends on clinician preference based on total body weight (TBW) or IBW.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study we performed non-inferiority analysis to compare the intubation conditions, duration of paralysis, and incidence of new-onset tachycardia or hypertension after intubation in obese patients requiring RSI in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective, observational study. Eligible for enrollment were adult patients with a TBW ≥30% IBW or body mass index ≥30 kilograms per meters squared who presented to the ED requiring RSI with the use of rocuronium. Rocuronium was dosed according to intubating physicians' preference. Physicians completed a survey assessing intubation conditions. Height and weight used for the calculation of the dose, the dose of rocuronium, time of administration, and time of muscle function recovery were recorded. Endpoints assessed included grading of view during laryngoscopy, first-past success, and duration of paralysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 96 patients were included, 54 in TBW and 42 in IBW. The TBW cohort received a mean of 1 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) compared to 0.71 mg/kg in the IBW group. Excellent intubation conditions were observed in 68.5% in the TBW group and 73.8% in the IBW group. The non-inferiority analysis for relative risk of excellent intubation was 1.12 (<i>P</i> = 0.12, [90% CI 0.80-1.50]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-inferiority analysis suggests that IBW dosing provides similar optimal intubation conditions when compared to TBW dosing, but the noninferiority comparison did not reach statistical significance. This study was unable to show statistical non-inferiority for IBW dosing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"22-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10777192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.60713","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Providing adequate paralysis and appropriate sedation is challenging in patients with obesity during rapid sequence intubation (RSI). Pharmacokinetic parameters play an important role in dosing of rocuronium due to low lipophilicity. Rocuronium may be dosed based on ideal body weight (IBW). Current guidelines do not offer recommendations for dosing in the setting of obesity. Dosing depends on clinician preference based on total body weight (TBW) or IBW.

Objective: In this study we performed non-inferiority analysis to compare the intubation conditions, duration of paralysis, and incidence of new-onset tachycardia or hypertension after intubation in obese patients requiring RSI in the emergency department (ED).

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, observational study. Eligible for enrollment were adult patients with a TBW ≥30% IBW or body mass index ≥30 kilograms per meters squared who presented to the ED requiring RSI with the use of rocuronium. Rocuronium was dosed according to intubating physicians' preference. Physicians completed a survey assessing intubation conditions. Height and weight used for the calculation of the dose, the dose of rocuronium, time of administration, and time of muscle function recovery were recorded. Endpoints assessed included grading of view during laryngoscopy, first-past success, and duration of paralysis.

Results: In total, 96 patients were included, 54 in TBW and 42 in IBW. The TBW cohort received a mean of 1 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) compared to 0.71 mg/kg in the IBW group. Excellent intubation conditions were observed in 68.5% in the TBW group and 73.8% in the IBW group. The non-inferiority analysis for relative risk of excellent intubation was 1.12 (P = 0.12, [90% CI 0.80-1.50]).

Conclusion: Non-inferiority analysis suggests that IBW dosing provides similar optimal intubation conditions when compared to TBW dosing, but the noninferiority comparison did not reach statistical significance. This study was unable to show statistical non-inferiority for IBW dosing.

肥胖症患者理想体重与总重量的罗库溴铵剂量:前瞻性、观察性非劣效研究
背景:在快速顺序插管(RSI)过程中,为肥胖患者提供充分的麻痹和适当的镇静具有挑战性。由于亲脂性较低,药代动力学参数在罗库溴铵的剂量中起着重要作用。可根据理想体重(IBW)确定罗库溴铵的剂量。目前的指南并未对肥胖症患者的剂量提出建议。剂量取决于临床医生根据总重量 (TBW) 或理想体重 (IBW) 的偏好:在这项研究中,我们进行了非劣效性分析,比较了急诊科(ED)中需要使用 RSI 的肥胖患者的插管条件、麻痹持续时间以及插管后新发心动过速或高血压的发生率:这是一项单中心、前瞻性观察研究。符合报名条件的患者均为TBW≥30% IBW或体重指数≥30公斤/米平方的成年患者,他们在急诊科就诊时需要使用罗库溴铵进行RSI。罗库溴铵的剂量根据插管医生的偏好而定。医生填写了一份插管条件评估调查表。记录了用于计算剂量的身高和体重、罗库洛铵的剂量、给药时间和肌肉功能恢复时间。评估终点包括喉镜检查时的视野分级、首次成功率和麻痹持续时间:共纳入 96 名患者,其中 TBW 患者 54 名,IBW 患者 42 名。TBW组的平均用药量为每公斤1毫克(mg/kg),而IBW组为每公斤0.71毫克。在 TBW 组和 IBW 组中,分别有 68.5% 和 73.8% 的人达到了良好的插管条件。优秀插管相对风险的非劣效性分析结果为 1.12(P = 0.12,[90% CI 0.80-1.50]):非劣效性分析表明,与TBW剂量相比,IBW剂量可提供相似的最佳插管条件,但非劣效性比较未达到统计学意义。本研究未能显示 IBW 给药的非劣效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信