João R Mesquita, Sérgio Santos-Silva, Nanci Ferreira, Antonio Rivero-Juarez, Guilherme Gonçalves, Maria São José Nascimento
{"title":"Hepatitis E Virus in Individuals Undergoing Heparin Therapy: An Observational Serological and Molecular Study.","authors":"João R Mesquita, Sérgio Santos-Silva, Nanci Ferreira, Antonio Rivero-Juarez, Guilherme Gonçalves, Maria São José Nascimento","doi":"10.2174/0115748863272272231122114732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heparin is derived from swine and has been suggested as a possible source of HEV. To study the potential risk of HEV infection associated with heparin treatment, two groups of individuals were compared. Sera from heparinized (N=93) and non-heparinized individuals (N=111) were tested for markers of acute HEV infection and anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An acute HEV case was defined by the presence of anti-HEV IgM and/or HEV RNA. From the 93 heparinized individuals, one was positive for IgM and IgG anti-HEV and two were positive for HEV RNA (for both ORF3 and ORF2), and there were a total of two (2.2%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. From the 111 non-heparinized individuals, three were positive for IgM anti-HEV, one was positive for both IgM and IgG anti-HEV, and none was positive for HEV RNA, and there were a total of three (2.7%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. The difference between HEV cases in the heparinized individuals and the non-heparinized individuals was not statistically significant (2.2% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.799).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concerning IgG anti-HEV, it was detected in 32 individuals from the heparinized group and in 18 from the non-heparinized control group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the presence of anti-HEV IgG in heparinized individuals and controls (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has not found any association between heparin treatment and acute HEV infection, but has shown the use of therapeutic heparin as a risk factor for IgG anti-HEV seropositivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863272272231122114732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Heparin is derived from swine and has been suggested as a possible source of HEV. To study the potential risk of HEV infection associated with heparin treatment, two groups of individuals were compared. Sera from heparinized (N=93) and non-heparinized individuals (N=111) were tested for markers of acute HEV infection and anti-HEV IgG seroprevalence.
Methods: An acute HEV case was defined by the presence of anti-HEV IgM and/or HEV RNA. From the 93 heparinized individuals, one was positive for IgM and IgG anti-HEV and two were positive for HEV RNA (for both ORF3 and ORF2), and there were a total of two (2.2%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. From the 111 non-heparinized individuals, three were positive for IgM anti-HEV, one was positive for both IgM and IgG anti-HEV, and none was positive for HEV RNA, and there were a total of three (2.7%) cases of current or recent HEV infection. The difference between HEV cases in the heparinized individuals and the non-heparinized individuals was not statistically significant (2.2% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.799).
Results: Concerning IgG anti-HEV, it was detected in 32 individuals from the heparinized group and in 18 from the non-heparinized control group. A statistically significant difference was observed in the presence of anti-HEV IgG in heparinized individuals and controls (p = 0.003).
Conclusion: This study has not found any association between heparin treatment and acute HEV infection, but has shown the use of therapeutic heparin as a risk factor for IgG anti-HEV seropositivity.
简介:肝素来自猪,被认为可能是 HEV 的来源。为了研究与肝素治疗相关的 HEV 感染潜在风险,我们对两组人进行了比较。对肝素治疗者(93 人)和非肝素治疗者(111 人)的血清进行了急性 HEV 感染标记物和抗 HEV IgG 血清流行率检测:急性 HEV 病例的定义是出现抗 HEV IgM 和/或 HEV RNA。在 93 名肝素感染者中,1 人的抗 HEV IgM 和 IgG 阳性,2 人的 HEV RNA 阳性(ORF3 和 ORF2),共有 2 人(2.2%)目前或近期感染 HEV。在 111 名未接受肝素治疗的人中,有 3 人的 IgM 抗 HEV 阳性,1 人的 IgM 和 IgG 抗 HEV 阳性,没有人的 HEV RNA 阳性,共有 3 例(2.7%)目前或近期感染 HEV 的病例。肝素注射者与非肝素注射者的 HEV 感染病例差异无统计学意义(2.2% 对 2.7%;P = 0.799):关于抗 HEV IgG,肝素化疗组的 32 人和非肝素化疗对照组的 18 人中都检测到了抗 HEV IgG。肝素化疗组和非肝素化疗对照组的抗 HEV IgG 存在统计学差异(p = 0.003):本研究未发现肝素治疗与急性 HEV 感染之间存在任何关联,但表明使用治疗性肝素是导致抗 HEV IgG 血清阳性的一个危险因素。
期刊介绍:
Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.