Calibration of Gridded Wind Speed Forecasts Based on Deep Learning

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Xuan Yang, Kan Dai, Yuejian Zhu
{"title":"Calibration of Gridded Wind Speed Forecasts Based on Deep Learning","authors":"Xuan Yang, Kan Dai, Yuejian Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s13351-023-3001-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The challenges of applying deep learning (DL) to correct deterministic numerical weather prediction (NWP) biases with non-Gaussian distributions are discussed in this paper. It is known that the DL UNet model is incapable of correcting the bias of strong winds with the traditional loss functions such as the MSE (mean square error), MAE (mean absolute error), and WMAE (weighted mean absolute error). To solve this, a new loss function embedded with a physical constraint called MAE_MR (miss ratio) is proposed. The performance of the UNet model with MAE_MR is compared to UNet traditional loss functions, and statistical post-processing methods like Kalman filter (KF) and the machine learning methods like random forest (RF) in correcting wind speed biases in gridded forecasts from the ECMWF high-resolution model (HRES) in East China for lead times of 1–7 days. In addition to MAE for full wind speed, wind force scales based on the Beaufort scale are derived and evaluated. Compared to raw HRES winds, the MAE of winds corrected by UNet (MAE_MR) improves by 22.8% on average at 24–168 h, while UNet (MAE), UNet (WMAE), UNet (MSE), RF, and KF improve by 18.9%, 18.9%, 17.9%, 13.8%, and 4.3%, respectively. UNet with MSE, MAE, and WMAE shows good correction for wind forces 1–3 and 4, but negative correction for 6 or higher. UNet (MAE_MR) overcomes this, improving accuracy for forces 1–3, 4, 5, and 6 or higher by 11.7%, 16.9%, 11.6%, and 6.4% over HRES. A case study of a strong wind event further shows UNet (MAE_MR) outperforms traditional post-processing in correcting strong wind biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":48796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Meteorological Research","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Meteorological Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-023-3001-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The challenges of applying deep learning (DL) to correct deterministic numerical weather prediction (NWP) biases with non-Gaussian distributions are discussed in this paper. It is known that the DL UNet model is incapable of correcting the bias of strong winds with the traditional loss functions such as the MSE (mean square error), MAE (mean absolute error), and WMAE (weighted mean absolute error). To solve this, a new loss function embedded with a physical constraint called MAE_MR (miss ratio) is proposed. The performance of the UNet model with MAE_MR is compared to UNet traditional loss functions, and statistical post-processing methods like Kalman filter (KF) and the machine learning methods like random forest (RF) in correcting wind speed biases in gridded forecasts from the ECMWF high-resolution model (HRES) in East China for lead times of 1–7 days. In addition to MAE for full wind speed, wind force scales based on the Beaufort scale are derived and evaluated. Compared to raw HRES winds, the MAE of winds corrected by UNet (MAE_MR) improves by 22.8% on average at 24–168 h, while UNet (MAE), UNet (WMAE), UNet (MSE), RF, and KF improve by 18.9%, 18.9%, 17.9%, 13.8%, and 4.3%, respectively. UNet with MSE, MAE, and WMAE shows good correction for wind forces 1–3 and 4, but negative correction for 6 or higher. UNet (MAE_MR) overcomes this, improving accuracy for forces 1–3, 4, 5, and 6 or higher by 11.7%, 16.9%, 11.6%, and 6.4% over HRES. A case study of a strong wind event further shows UNet (MAE_MR) outperforms traditional post-processing in correcting strong wind biases.

基于深度学习的网格风速预报校准
本文讨论了应用深度学习(DL)纠正非高斯分布的确定性数值天气预报(NWP)偏差所面临的挑战。众所周知,DL UNet 模型无法用 MSE(均方误差)、MAE(平均绝对误差)和 WMAE(加权平均绝对误差)等传统损失函数纠正强风偏差。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种嵌入物理约束的新损失函数 MAE_MR(失误率)。在纠正 ECMWF 高分辨率模式(HRES)华东地区 1-7 天网格预报的风速偏差方面,比较了带有 MAE_MR 的 UNet 模式与 UNet 传统损失函数、卡尔曼滤波器(KF)等统计后处理方法以及随机森林(RF)等机器学习方法的性能。除了全风速的 MAE 外,还得出并评估了基于蒲福风级的风力标度。与原始 HRES 风相比,经 UNet(MAE_MR)校正的风的 MAE 在 24-168 h 平均提高了 22.8%,而 UNet(MAE)、UNet(WMAE)、UNet(MSE)、RF 和 KF 分别提高了 18.9%、18.9%、17.9%、13.8% 和 4.3%。使用 MSE、MAE 和 WMAE 的 UNet 对 1-3 级和 4 级风力的修正效果良好,但对 6 级或更高风力的修正效果为负。UNet(MAE_MR)克服了这一问题,与 HRES 相比,1-3、4、5 和 6 级或更高风力的精度分别提高了 11.7%、16.9%、11.6% 和 6.4%。强风事件案例研究进一步表明,UNet (MAE_MR) 在纠正强风偏差方面优于传统的后处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Meteorological Research
Journal of Meteorological Research METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Journal of Meteorological Research (previously known as Acta Meteorologica Sinica) publishes the latest achievements and developments in the field of atmospheric sciences. Coverage is broad, including topics such as pure and applied meteorology; climatology and climate change; marine meteorology; atmospheric physics and chemistry; cloud physics and weather modification; numerical weather prediction; data assimilation; atmospheric sounding and remote sensing; atmospheric environment and air pollution; radar and satellite meteorology; agricultural and forest meteorology and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信