Assessment of Angiography-Based Renal Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurement in Patients with Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xiang Huang, Xiao-Lan Li, Heng Zhou, Xiao-Mei Li
{"title":"Assessment of Angiography-Based Renal Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurement in Patients with Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis","authors":"Xiang Huang,&nbsp;Xiao-Lan Li,&nbsp;Heng Zhou,&nbsp;Xiao-Mei Li","doi":"10.1155/2024/4618868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Background</i>. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an angiography-based fractional flow reserve measurement without pressure wire or induction of hyperemia. A recent innovation that uses combined geometrical data and hemodynamic boundary conditions to measure QFR from a single angiographic view has shown the potential to measure QFR of the renal artery-renal QFR (rQFR). <i>Objective</i>. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of rQFR measurement and the contribution of rQFR in selecting patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) undergoing revascularization. <i>Methods</i>. This retrospective trial enrolled patients who had ARAS (50-90%) and hypertension. The enrolled patients were treated by optimal antihypertensive medication or revascularization, respectively, and the therapeutic strategies were based on rFFR measurement and/or clinical feature. <i>Results</i>. A total of 55 patients underwent rQFR measurement. Among the enrolled patients, 18 underwent optimal antihypertensive medication and 37 underwent revascularization, 19 patients in whom rQFR and rFFR were both assessed. During the 180-day follow-up, 25 patients saw an improvement in their blood pressure among the 37 patients that underwent revascularization. ROC analysis revealed that rQFR had a high diagnostic accuracy for predicting blood pressure improvement (AUC<sub>rQFR</sub> = 0.932, 95% CI 0.798-0.998). The ideal cut-off value of rQFR for predicting blood pressure improvement after revascularization is ≤0.72 (sensitivity: 72.00%, specificity: 100%). The paired <i>t</i> test and Bland–Altman analyses demonstrated good agreement between rQFR and rFFR (<i>t</i> = 1.887, 95% CI -0.021 to 0.001, 95% limits of agreement: -0.035 to 0.055, <i>p</i> = 0.075). The Spearman correlation test reveals that there was a significant positive correlation between rQFR and rFFR (<i>r</i> = 0.952, 95% CI 0.874 to 0.982, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). <i>Conclusion</i>. The rQFR has the potential to enhance the ability of angiography to detect functionally significant renal artery stenosis during angiography and to produce results that are comparable to invasive hemodynamic assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9582,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/4618868","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/4618868","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an angiography-based fractional flow reserve measurement without pressure wire or induction of hyperemia. A recent innovation that uses combined geometrical data and hemodynamic boundary conditions to measure QFR from a single angiographic view has shown the potential to measure QFR of the renal artery-renal QFR (rQFR). Objective. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of rQFR measurement and the contribution of rQFR in selecting patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) undergoing revascularization. Methods. This retrospective trial enrolled patients who had ARAS (50-90%) and hypertension. The enrolled patients were treated by optimal antihypertensive medication or revascularization, respectively, and the therapeutic strategies were based on rFFR measurement and/or clinical feature. Results. A total of 55 patients underwent rQFR measurement. Among the enrolled patients, 18 underwent optimal antihypertensive medication and 37 underwent revascularization, 19 patients in whom rQFR and rFFR were both assessed. During the 180-day follow-up, 25 patients saw an improvement in their blood pressure among the 37 patients that underwent revascularization. ROC analysis revealed that rQFR had a high diagnostic accuracy for predicting blood pressure improvement (AUCrQFR = 0.932, 95% CI 0.798-0.998). The ideal cut-off value of rQFR for predicting blood pressure improvement after revascularization is ≤0.72 (sensitivity: 72.00%, specificity: 100%). The paired t test and Bland–Altman analyses demonstrated good agreement between rQFR and rFFR (t = 1.887, 95% CI -0.021 to 0.001, 95% limits of agreement: -0.035 to 0.055, p = 0.075). The Spearman correlation test reveals that there was a significant positive correlation between rQFR and rFFR (r = 0.952, 95% CI 0.874 to 0.982, p < 0.001). Conclusion. The rQFR has the potential to enhance the ability of angiography to detect functionally significant renal artery stenosis during angiography and to produce results that are comparable to invasive hemodynamic assessment.

基于血管造影的动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄患者肾脏定量血流比率测量评估
背景。定量血流比(QFR)是一种基于血管造影的分数血流储备测量方法,无需压力导线或诱导充血。最近的一项创新利用几何数据和血流动力学边界条件来测量单个血管造影视图的 QFR,显示了测量肾动脉-肾脏 QFR(rQFR)的潜力。目的。本试验研究旨在评估 rQFR 测量的可行性,以及 rQFR 在选择接受血管重建术的动脉粥样硬化性肾动脉狭窄(ARAS)患者时的作用。方法。这项回顾性试验招募了患有 ARAS(50%-90%)和高血压的患者。入选患者分别接受了最佳降压药物治疗或血管重建术,治疗策略基于rFFR测量值和/或临床特征。结果共有 55 名患者接受了 rQFR 测量。其中,18 名患者接受了最佳降压药物治疗,37 名患者接受了血管重建手术,19 名患者的 rQFR 和 rFFR 均接受了评估。在 180 天的随访中,接受血管重建手术的 37 名患者中有 25 名患者的血压有所改善。ROC 分析显示,rQFR 在预测血压改善方面具有很高的诊断准确性(95% CI 0.798-0.998)。预测血管再通术后血压改善的理想rQFR临界值为≤0.72(灵敏度:72.00%,特异性:100%)。配对试验和 Bland-Altman 分析表明,rQFR 和 rFFR 之间的一致性很好(95% CI -0.021 至 0.001,95% 的一致性界限:-0.035 至 0.055,)。斯皮尔曼相关性检验显示,rQFR 和 rFFR 之间存在显著的正相关性(95% CI 0.874 至 0.982,)。结论rQFR 有可能提高血管造影术检测功能性肾动脉狭窄的能力,并产生与有创血液动力学评估相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Therapeutics 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Therapeutics (formerly Cardiovascular Drug Reviews) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on cardiovascular and clinical pharmacology, as well as clinical trials of new cardiovascular therapies. Articles on translational research, pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, device, gene and cell therapies, and pharmacoepidemiology are also encouraged. Subject areas include (but are by no means limited to): Acute coronary syndrome Arrhythmias Atherosclerosis Basic cardiac electrophysiology Cardiac catheterization Cardiac remodeling Coagulation and thrombosis Diabetic cardiovascular disease Heart failure (systolic HF, HFrEF, diastolic HF, HFpEF) Hyperlipidemia Hypertension Ischemic heart disease Vascular biology Ventricular assist devices Molecular cardio-biology Myocardial regeneration Lipoprotein metabolism Radial artery access Percutaneous coronary intervention Transcatheter aortic and mitral valve replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信