Heterogeneous Academic Achievement Profiles of Initially STEM-Intending Students Over the College Years

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tong Li, Chris Kirk, Leticia Oseguera
{"title":"Heterogeneous Academic Achievement Profiles of Initially STEM-Intending Students Over the College Years","authors":"Tong Li, Chris Kirk, Leticia Oseguera","doi":"10.1353/csd.2023.a917027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Heterogeneous Academic Achievement Profiles of Initially STEM-Intending Students Over the College Years <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Tong Li, Chris Kirk, and Leticia Oseguera (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Academic achievement, often measured by GPA, has been extensively studied in the literature of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, including its impact on student persistence and success in college (Rask, 2010). However, most research has only looked at students’ performance at a single point in time, such as their first-year GPA, and has not explored how their academic performance changes over time. As a result, there is a gap in our understanding of the longitudinal aspects of students’ intellectual journeys through college. While some evidence has suggested that students follow different paths of development or academic progress over time (Fesseha et al., 2020; Hong &amp;You, 2012; Robinson et al., 2018), only a few studies have investigated features of college students’ academic achievement changes over the long term, particularly in STEM fields. The literature on college students’ academic performance over time has suggested that while it can be unstable, many students can improve their GPA throughout their college studies. Humphreys (1968) made this observation, and more recent longitudinal studies have supported this idea, including a study by Mabel and Britton (2018). Factors affecting the variability of college students’ academic performance over time, such as GPA slope and variance, have also been investigated. Cheng et al. (2012) found that female students performed better over time and experienced less GPA instability when they had higher levels of family social support. However, research has identified persistent disparities in academic achievement in specific student populations. Sharkness et al. (2010) found that graduating seniors who entered college with an interest in STEM majors exhibited a significant cumulative GPA difference between White students and their Black and Latino peers, even after controlling for precollege academic preparation, college experiences, and institutional contexts.</p> <p>While these studies attempted to uncover the longitudinal features of college students’ academic performance, there has been relatively little research into the different change patterns, particularly among those who entered college with an interest in a STEM major. This study aimed to fill this gap by adding a nuanced understanding of the academic performance change patterns of a group of initially STEM-intending college students at State University and was guided by two research questions: (a) What are the change patterns in those students’ academic performance across different semesters? (b) How are these patterns related to their background and college experiences? <strong>[End Page 728]</strong></p> <h2>METHODOLOGY</h2> <p>We conducted latent profile analysis (LPA) on eight semester-GPA scores of a group of initially STEM-intending students to identify the change patterns of students’ longitudinal academic profiles. LPA is a statistical method that aims to identify distinct groups of personal attributes based on continuous variables by fitting multiple models with an increasing number of profiles until a model that best fits the data is found (Spurk et al., 2020). Although there is no universally agreed-upon minimum sample size for conducting LPA, some scholars have suggested that a sample size of more than 500 is sufficient to detect the correct number of latent profiles in the data (Tein et al., 2013). Using this as a guideline, we selected a total of 625 students, which comprised a group of aspiring STEM students who were participating in a STEM support program, along with a comparable group of peers who were selected based on their similarity in terms of race, gender, and intended STEM majors at State University.</p> <p>State University is a public, land-grant research university with an enrollment of more than 48,000 students as of fall 2022. It has an acceptance rate of approximately 50% and a 6-year graduation rate of around 85%. The university has a predominantly White student body, with over 60% of students identifying as White. Approximately 46% of students are women. The students included in this study were admitted to the university between 2012 and 2016 and reported an intention to pursue a STEM major at the time of admission.</p> <p>The primary indicator we focused on in this study was students’ academic performance, which we operationalized as the composite GPA score at the end of each semester. Through a program...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":15454,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Development","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2023.a917027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Heterogeneous Academic Achievement Profiles of Initially STEM-Intending Students Over the College Years
  • Tong Li, Chris Kirk, and Leticia Oseguera (bio)

Academic achievement, often measured by GPA, has been extensively studied in the literature of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, including its impact on student persistence and success in college (Rask, 2010). However, most research has only looked at students’ performance at a single point in time, such as their first-year GPA, and has not explored how their academic performance changes over time. As a result, there is a gap in our understanding of the longitudinal aspects of students’ intellectual journeys through college. While some evidence has suggested that students follow different paths of development or academic progress over time (Fesseha et al., 2020; Hong &You, 2012; Robinson et al., 2018), only a few studies have investigated features of college students’ academic achievement changes over the long term, particularly in STEM fields. The literature on college students’ academic performance over time has suggested that while it can be unstable, many students can improve their GPA throughout their college studies. Humphreys (1968) made this observation, and more recent longitudinal studies have supported this idea, including a study by Mabel and Britton (2018). Factors affecting the variability of college students’ academic performance over time, such as GPA slope and variance, have also been investigated. Cheng et al. (2012) found that female students performed better over time and experienced less GPA instability when they had higher levels of family social support. However, research has identified persistent disparities in academic achievement in specific student populations. Sharkness et al. (2010) found that graduating seniors who entered college with an interest in STEM majors exhibited a significant cumulative GPA difference between White students and their Black and Latino peers, even after controlling for precollege academic preparation, college experiences, and institutional contexts.

While these studies attempted to uncover the longitudinal features of college students’ academic performance, there has been relatively little research into the different change patterns, particularly among those who entered college with an interest in a STEM major. This study aimed to fill this gap by adding a nuanced understanding of the academic performance change patterns of a group of initially STEM-intending college students at State University and was guided by two research questions: (a) What are the change patterns in those students’ academic performance across different semesters? (b) How are these patterns related to their background and college experiences? [End Page 728]

METHODOLOGY

We conducted latent profile analysis (LPA) on eight semester-GPA scores of a group of initially STEM-intending students to identify the change patterns of students’ longitudinal academic profiles. LPA is a statistical method that aims to identify distinct groups of personal attributes based on continuous variables by fitting multiple models with an increasing number of profiles until a model that best fits the data is found (Spurk et al., 2020). Although there is no universally agreed-upon minimum sample size for conducting LPA, some scholars have suggested that a sample size of more than 500 is sufficient to detect the correct number of latent profiles in the data (Tein et al., 2013). Using this as a guideline, we selected a total of 625 students, which comprised a group of aspiring STEM students who were participating in a STEM support program, along with a comparable group of peers who were selected based on their similarity in terms of race, gender, and intended STEM majors at State University.

State University is a public, land-grant research university with an enrollment of more than 48,000 students as of fall 2022. It has an acceptance rate of approximately 50% and a 6-year graduation rate of around 85%. The university has a predominantly White student body, with over 60% of students identifying as White. Approximately 46% of students are women. The students included in this study were admitted to the university between 2012 and 2016 and reported an intention to pursue a STEM major at the time of admission.

The primary indicator we focused on in this study was students’ academic performance, which we operationalized as the composite GPA score at the end of each semester. Through a program...

最初进入 STEM 学习的学生在大学期间的不同学业成绩概况
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 最初进入 STEM 学习的学生在大学期间的异质学业成绩概况 李彤、克里斯-科克和莱蒂西亚-奥塞格拉 (bio) 在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育的文献中,学业成绩(通常以 GPA 衡量)已被广泛研究,包括其对学生在大学的坚持和成功的影响(Rask,2010 年)。然而,大多数研究只关注学生在单一时间点上的表现,如第一年的 GPA,而没有探讨他们的学业成绩是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。因此,我们对学生大学求知历程的纵向理解还存在差距。虽然有证据表明,随着时间的推移,学生会遵循不同的发展路径或学业进步(Fesseha 等人,2020;Hong &You, 2012;Robinson 等人,2018),但只有少数研究调查了大学生学业成绩的长期变化特征,尤其是在 STEM 领域。有关大学生学业成绩随时间变化的文献表明,虽然学业成绩可能不稳定,但许多学生在整个大学学习期间都能提高自己的 GPA。Humphreys(1968 年)提出了这一观点,最近的纵向研究也支持这一观点,包括 Mabel 和 Britton(2018 年)的研究。还有人研究了影响大学生学业成绩随时间变化的因素,如 GPA 斜率和方差。Cheng 等人(2012)发现,当女生拥有较高水平的家庭社会支持时,她们的学业成绩随着时间的推移会更好,GPA 的不稳定性也会更小。然而,研究也发现了特定学生群体在学业成绩方面持续存在的差异。Sharkness 等人(2010 年)发现,即使在控制了大学前的学业准备、大学经历和院校背景之后,以 STEM 专业为兴趣进入大学的即将毕业的高年级学生中,白人学生与黑人和拉丁裔同龄人之间的累积 GPA 仍存在显著差异。虽然这些研究试图揭示大学生学业成绩的纵向特征,但对不同变化模式的研究相对较少,尤其是那些对 STEM 专业感兴趣而进入大学的学生。本研究旨在填补这一空白,对州立大学一群最初对 STEM 感兴趣的大学生的学业成绩变化模式进行细致入微的了解,并以两个研究问题为指导:(a) 这些学生在不同学期的学业成绩变化模式是什么?(b) 这些模式与他们的背景和大学经历有何关系?[方法 我们对一组最初有 STEM 意向的学生的八个学期的 GPA 分数进行了潜在特征分析(LPA),以确定学生纵向学业成绩的变化规律。LPA 是一种统计方法,其目的是根据连续变量确定不同的个人属性群体,方法是用越来越多的特征拟合多个模型,直到找到最适合数据的模型为止(Spurk 等人,2020 年)。虽然没有普遍认同的进行 LPA 的最小样本量,但一些学者认为,500 个以上的样本量足以检测出数据中潜在特征的正确数量(Tein 等人,2013 年)。以此为准则,我们选取了总共 625 名学生,其中包括参加 STEM 支持计划的有抱负的 STEM 学生,以及根据种族、性别和打算在州立大学学习 STEM 专业的相似性选取的可比同龄人。州立大学是一所公立赠地研究型大学,截至 2022 年秋季,在校学生人数超过 48,000 人。该校的录取率约为 50%,6 年毕业率约为 85%。该大学的学生以白人为主,超过 60% 的学生认为自己是白人。女生约占 46%。参与本研究的学生是在 2012 年至 2016 年期间被该校录取的,他们在入学时表示有意攻读 STEM 专业。在本研究中,我们关注的主要指标是学生的学业成绩,即每学期末的综合 GPA 分数。通过一项计划...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Published six times per year for the American College Personnel Association.Founded in 1959, the Journal of College Student Development has been the leading source of research about college students and the field of student affairs for over four decades. JCSD is the largest empirical research journal in the field of student affairs and higher education, and is the official journal of the American College Personnel Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信