Analysis of production routes for silicon carbide using air as carbon source empowering negative emissions

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Andreas Mühlbauer, Dominik Keiner, Tansu Galimova, Christian Breyer
{"title":"Analysis of production routes for silicon carbide using air as carbon source empowering negative emissions","authors":"Andreas Mühlbauer, Dominik Keiner, Tansu Galimova, Christian Breyer","doi":"10.1007/s11027-023-10100-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A rapid defossilisation of the industry sector is required to stop further greenhouse gas emissions and to curb global warming. Additionally, to avoid irreversible consequences caused by climate change, the deployment of negative emission technologies is required to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) concentration in Earth’s atmosphere to a sustainable level. A novel approach to store gaseous CO<sub>2</sub> from direct air capture facilities in solid silicon carbide (SiC) is presented. A chain of established processes to produce SiC from renewable electricity and air is evaluated in terms of energy and mass balances. Furthermore, possible fields of SiC utilisation are considered. Electricity-based SiC (e-SiC) can serve the growing global market for technical ceramics and can possibly be used to tackle increasing construction sand shortages in the construction industry by partially substituting sand. Calculations of the levelised cost of carbon dioxide removal show that storing ambient CO<sub>2</sub> in solid SiC that can be subsequently sold on the world market can eventually create profit. In 2050, a net benefit of 259 €/tCO<sub>2</sub> or 631 €/tSiC can be realised if the SiC product is sold at the world market with additional carbon compensation. Therefore, the proposed SiC production chain might be able to challenge conventionally produced SiC, while empowering negative emissions. In 2050, the net CO<sub>2</sub> emission potential is limited to about 290 MtCO<sub>2</sub>/a for technical ceramics, but may reach up to 13.6 GtCO<sub>2</sub>/a for construction sand. Results show that e-SiC production is economically feasible for technical ceramics but not for construction sand without further process cost decrease. Alternative processes to produce e-SiC are described and evaluated. Future research opportunities are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54387,"journal":{"name":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10100-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A rapid defossilisation of the industry sector is required to stop further greenhouse gas emissions and to curb global warming. Additionally, to avoid irreversible consequences caused by climate change, the deployment of negative emission technologies is required to reduce the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in Earth’s atmosphere to a sustainable level. A novel approach to store gaseous CO2 from direct air capture facilities in solid silicon carbide (SiC) is presented. A chain of established processes to produce SiC from renewable electricity and air is evaluated in terms of energy and mass balances. Furthermore, possible fields of SiC utilisation are considered. Electricity-based SiC (e-SiC) can serve the growing global market for technical ceramics and can possibly be used to tackle increasing construction sand shortages in the construction industry by partially substituting sand. Calculations of the levelised cost of carbon dioxide removal show that storing ambient CO2 in solid SiC that can be subsequently sold on the world market can eventually create profit. In 2050, a net benefit of 259 €/tCO2 or 631 €/tSiC can be realised if the SiC product is sold at the world market with additional carbon compensation. Therefore, the proposed SiC production chain might be able to challenge conventionally produced SiC, while empowering negative emissions. In 2050, the net CO2 emission potential is limited to about 290 MtCO2/a for technical ceramics, but may reach up to 13.6 GtCO2/a for construction sand. Results show that e-SiC production is economically feasible for technical ceramics but not for construction sand without further process cost decrease. Alternative processes to produce e-SiC are described and evaluated. Future research opportunities are discussed.

Abstract Image

以空气为碳源、赋予负排放能力的碳化硅生产路线分析
要阻止温室气体的进一步排放并遏制全球变暖,就必须迅速实现工业部门的化石燃料化。此外,为避免气候变化造成不可逆转的后果,需要采用负排放技术,将地球大气中的二氧化碳(CO2)浓度降至可持续水平。本文介绍了一种将直接空气捕集设施产生的气态二氧化碳储存在固态碳化硅(SiC)中的新方法。从能量和质量平衡的角度,对利用可再生电力和空气生产碳化硅的一系列成熟工艺进行了评估。此外,还考虑了碳化硅利用的可能领域。以电力为基础的碳化硅(e-SiC)可以服务于不断增长的全球技术陶瓷市场,并有可能通过部分替代沙子来解决建筑行业日益严重的建筑用沙短缺问题。对清除二氧化碳的平准化成本的计算表明,将环境中的二氧化碳储存在固体碳化硅中,然后在全球市场上出售,最终可以创造利润。到 2050 年,如果碳化硅产品在世界市场上销售并获得额外的碳补偿,则可实现 259 欧元/吨 CO2 或 631 欧元/吨碳化硅的净收益。因此,拟议的碳化硅生产链可以挑战传统生产的碳化硅,同时实现负排放。到 2050 年,技术陶瓷的二氧化碳净排放潜力仅限于约 2.9 亿吨 CO2/a,但建筑用砂的二氧化碳净排放潜力可能高达 13.6 GtCO2/a。结果表明,如果工艺成本不进一步降低,电子碳化硅生产对于技术陶瓷来说是经济可行的,但对于建筑用砂来说则不可行。对生产 e-SiC 的替代工艺进行了描述和评估。讨论了未来的研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth''s biosphere is being transformed by various anthropogenic activities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change addresses a wide range of environment, economic and energy topics and timely issues including global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, acid deposition, eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, species extinction and loss of biological diversity, deforestation and forest degradation, desertification, soil resource degradation, land-use change, sea level rise, destruction of coastal zones, depletion of fresh water and marine fisheries, loss of wetlands and riparian zones and hazardous waste management. Response options to mitigate these threats or to adapt to changing environs are needed to ensure a sustainable biosphere for all forms of life. To that end, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change provides a forum to encourage the conceptualization, critical examination and debate regarding response options. The aim of this journal is to provide a forum to review, analyze and stimulate the development, testing and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies at regional, national and global scales. One of the primary goals of this journal is to contribute to real-time policy analysis and development as national and international policies and agreements are discussed and promulgated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信