{"title":"Counterexample and an additional revealing poll step for a result of “analysis of direct searches for discontinuous functions”","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10107-023-02042-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>This note provides a counterexample to a theorem announced in the last part of the paper (Vicente and Custódio Math Program 133:299–325, 2012). The counterexample involves an objective function <span> <span>\\(f: \\mathbb {R}\\rightarrow \\mathbb {R}\\)</span> </span> which satisfies all the assumptions required by the theorem but contradicts some of its conclusions. A corollary of this theorem is also affected by this counterexample. The main flaw revealed by the counterexample is the possibility that a directional direct search method (dDSM) generates a sequence of trial points <span> <span>\\((x_k)_{k \\in \\mathbb {N}}\\)</span> </span> converging to a point <span> <span>\\(x_*\\)</span> </span> where <em>f</em> is discontinuous, lower semicontinuous and whose objective function value <span> <span>\\(f(x_*)\\)</span> </span> is strictly less than <span> <span>\\(\\lim _{k\\rightarrow \\infty } f(x_k)\\)</span> </span>. Moreover the dDSM generates trial points in only one of the continuity sets of <em>f</em> near <span> <span>\\(x_*\\)</span> </span>. This note also investigates the proof of the theorem to highlight the inexact statements in the original paper. Finally this work introduces a modification of the dDSM that allows, in usual cases, to recover the properties broken by the counterexample. </p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-023-02042-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This note provides a counterexample to a theorem announced in the last part of the paper (Vicente and Custódio Math Program 133:299–325, 2012). The counterexample involves an objective function \(f: \mathbb {R}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}\) which satisfies all the assumptions required by the theorem but contradicts some of its conclusions. A corollary of this theorem is also affected by this counterexample. The main flaw revealed by the counterexample is the possibility that a directional direct search method (dDSM) generates a sequence of trial points \((x_k)_{k \in \mathbb {N}}\) converging to a point \(x_*\) where f is discontinuous, lower semicontinuous and whose objective function value \(f(x_*)\) is strictly less than \(\lim _{k\rightarrow \infty } f(x_k)\). Moreover the dDSM generates trial points in only one of the continuity sets of f near \(x_*\). This note also investigates the proof of the theorem to highlight the inexact statements in the original paper. Finally this work introduces a modification of the dDSM that allows, in usual cases, to recover the properties broken by the counterexample.