Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool

Jennifer Jacobs, Karla Scornavacco, Charis Clevenger, Abhijit Suresh, Tamara Sumner
{"title":"Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool","authors":"Jennifer Jacobs, Karla Scornavacco, Charis Clevenger, Abhijit Suresh, Tamara Sumner","doi":"10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":501584,"journal":{"name":"Educational Technology Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Technology Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.

Abstract Image

话语动作的自动反馈:教师对专业学习工具效用的看法
提供课堂教学自动反馈的技术工具为教育工作者提供了一个独特的机会,使他们能够进行自我反思,努力实现改进目标,特别是确保他们的教学环境对学生来说是公平和富有成效的。我们需要更多关于教师如何体验自动化专业学习工具的信息,包括他们认为哪些工具与他们的日常教学相关并对他们产生影响。这项混合方法研究探讨了 21 名数学教师对使用人工智能工具的看法和参与情况,该工具可从课堂录音中生成有关教师话语实践的信息。研究结果表明,教师认为该工具具有很高的实用价值,尤其是那些选择在两个学年中使用该工具的教师。随着时间的推移,这些教师更多地使用了 "谈话动作",这表明他们通过审查和接受个性化反馈,有意识地做出了改变。本研究的这些结果为开发基于人工智能的专业学习工具(尤其是具有强大感知效用的工具)指明了方向,这些工具可以为教师的学习和教学改进提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信