Age differences in emotional reactions to ageist memes and changes in age of one's Best Self

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Patricia Kahlbaugh , Jacklyn Ramos-Arvelo , Madison Brenning , Loreen Huffman
{"title":"Age differences in emotional reactions to ageist memes and changes in age of one's Best Self","authors":"Patricia Kahlbaugh ,&nbsp;Jacklyn Ramos-Arvelo ,&nbsp;Madison Brenning ,&nbsp;Loreen Huffman","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Memes on social media can carry ageist messages and can elicit reactions that are both emotional and self-evaluative. The present study investigates age-related differences in nine discrete emotions and in the evaluation of when individuals have been or will be their best selves. Participants (<em>n</em> = 360) representing young (<em>m</em> = 26 years), middle-aged (<em>m</em> = 39 years) and older adults (<em>m</em> = 63 years) were randomly assigned to view either non-ageist (animals) or ageist (e.g., incompetent older people) memes. After viewing memes, we assessed nine emotional reactions (i.e., fear, anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, discomfort, disgust, surprise, enjoyment) and Best Self evaluations. Younger and middle-aged people reported more intense emotional reactions to memes than older people, with the exception that older people reported more discomfort and disgust in response to ageist versus non-ageist memes. Younger adults were less surprised by ageist memes (vs. non-ageist) and for all age groups ageist memes (vs. non-ageist) elicited less happiness and enjoyment and were less likely to be shared. With respect to evaluations of one's Best Self, older individuals were more likely to report being their best selves in the past, while after viewing ageist memes, younger individuals were more likely to report being their best selves in the future. Emotions of disgust and discomfort were related to identifying one's Best Self as further in the past. The current study adds to the literature on the impact of ageism by examining age-related differences in the emotions and self-evaluations experienced when confronted with memes on social media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000021/pdfft?md5=906d763cfd5c2a845a1a4059a942dded&pid=1-s2.0-S0890406524000021-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Memes on social media can carry ageist messages and can elicit reactions that are both emotional and self-evaluative. The present study investigates age-related differences in nine discrete emotions and in the evaluation of when individuals have been or will be their best selves. Participants (n = 360) representing young (m = 26 years), middle-aged (m = 39 years) and older adults (m = 63 years) were randomly assigned to view either non-ageist (animals) or ageist (e.g., incompetent older people) memes. After viewing memes, we assessed nine emotional reactions (i.e., fear, anger, sadness, happiness, anxiety, discomfort, disgust, surprise, enjoyment) and Best Self evaluations. Younger and middle-aged people reported more intense emotional reactions to memes than older people, with the exception that older people reported more discomfort and disgust in response to ageist versus non-ageist memes. Younger adults were less surprised by ageist memes (vs. non-ageist) and for all age groups ageist memes (vs. non-ageist) elicited less happiness and enjoyment and were less likely to be shared. With respect to evaluations of one's Best Self, older individuals were more likely to report being their best selves in the past, while after viewing ageist memes, younger individuals were more likely to report being their best selves in the future. Emotions of disgust and discomfort were related to identifying one's Best Self as further in the past. The current study adds to the literature on the impact of ageism by examining age-related differences in the emotions and self-evaluations experienced when confronted with memes on social media.

对年龄歧视备忘录的情绪反应的年龄差异和最佳自我年龄的变化
社交媒体上的备忘录可能带有年龄歧视的信息,也可能引起情绪和自我评价方面的反应。本研究调查了九种离散情绪中与年龄有关的差异,以及对个人何时已经或将成为最好的自己的评价。参与者(n = 360)分别代表年轻人(m = 26 岁)、中年人(m = 39 岁)和老年人(m = 63 岁),他们被随机分配观看非年龄歧视(动物)或年龄歧视(如不称职的老年人)的备忘录。观看备忘录后,我们评估了九种情绪反应(即恐惧、愤怒、悲伤、快乐、焦虑、不适、厌恶、惊讶、享受)和最佳自我评价。与老年人相比,年轻人和中年人对信息备忘录的情绪反应更强烈,但老年人对有年龄歧视的信息备忘录和无年龄歧视的信息备忘录的不适感和厌恶感更强烈。较年轻的成年人对老龄歧视主题(与非老龄歧视主题相比)的惊讶程度较低,而对所有年龄组的人来说,老龄歧视主题(与非老龄歧视主题相比)引起的快乐和享受程度较低,被分享的可能性也较低。在对 "最好的自己 "的评价方面,年龄较大的人更倾向于认为自己在过去是最好的自己,而年龄较小的人则更倾向于认为自己在未来是最好的自己。厌恶和不适的情绪与认为过去的最佳自我更进一步有关。本研究通过考察人们在面对社交媒体上的漫画时所体验到的情绪和自我评价方面与年龄有关的差异,为有关年龄歧视影响的文献增添了新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信