Validation of Echocardiographic Measurements in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism in the RIETE Registry.

Mads Dam Lyhne, Behnood Bikdeli, David M Dudzinski, Alfonso Muriel-García, Christopher Kabrhel, Teresa Sancho-Bueso, Esther Pérez-David, José Luis Lobo, Ángel Alonso-Gómez, David Jiménez, Manuel Monreal
{"title":"Validation of Echocardiographic Measurements in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism in the RIETE Registry.","authors":"Mads Dam Lyhne, Behnood Bikdeli, David M Dudzinski, Alfonso Muriel-García, Christopher Kabrhel, Teresa Sancho-Bueso, Esther Pérez-David, José Luis Lobo, Ángel Alonso-Gómez, David Jiménez, Manuel Monreal","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1777765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), echocardiographic identification of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction will inform prognostication and clinical decision-making. Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica (RIETE) is the world's largest registry of patients with objectively confirmed PE. The reliability of site-reported RV echocardiographic measurements is unknown. We aimed to validate site-reported key RV echocardiographic measurements in the RIETE registry. <b>Methods</b>  Fifty-one randomly chosen patients in RIETE who had transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed for acute PE were included. TTEs were de-identified and analyzed by a core laboratory of two independent observers blinded to site-reported data. To investigate reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots between the two observers, and between an average of the two observers and the RIETE site-reported data were obtained. <b>Results</b>  Core laboratory interobserver variations were very limited with correlation coefficients >0.8 for all TTE parameters. Agreement was substantial between core laboratory observers and site-reported data for key parameters including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (ICC 0.728; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.594-0.862) and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (ICC 0.726; 95% CI, 0.601-0.852). Agreement on right-to-left ventricular diameter ratio (ICC 0.739; 95% CI, 0.443-1.000) was validated, although missing data limited the precision of the estimates. Bland-Altman plots showed differences close to zero. <b>Conclusion</b>  We showed substantial reliability of key RV site-reported measurements in the RIETE registry. Ascertaining the validity of such data adds confidence and reliability for subsequent investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94220,"journal":{"name":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10774011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  In acute pulmonary embolism (PE), echocardiographic identification of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction will inform prognostication and clinical decision-making. Registro Informatizado Enfermedad TromboEmbolica (RIETE) is the world's largest registry of patients with objectively confirmed PE. The reliability of site-reported RV echocardiographic measurements is unknown. We aimed to validate site-reported key RV echocardiographic measurements in the RIETE registry. Methods  Fifty-one randomly chosen patients in RIETE who had transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed for acute PE were included. TTEs were de-identified and analyzed by a core laboratory of two independent observers blinded to site-reported data. To investigate reliability, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots between the two observers, and between an average of the two observers and the RIETE site-reported data were obtained. Results  Core laboratory interobserver variations were very limited with correlation coefficients >0.8 for all TTE parameters. Agreement was substantial between core laboratory observers and site-reported data for key parameters including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (ICC 0.728; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.594-0.862) and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (ICC 0.726; 95% CI, 0.601-0.852). Agreement on right-to-left ventricular diameter ratio (ICC 0.739; 95% CI, 0.443-1.000) was validated, although missing data limited the precision of the estimates. Bland-Altman plots showed differences close to zero. Conclusion  We showed substantial reliability of key RV site-reported measurements in the RIETE registry. Ascertaining the validity of such data adds confidence and reliability for subsequent investigations.

RIETE 登记处肺栓塞患者超声心动图测量结果的验证。
背景 在急性肺栓塞(PE)患者中,超声心动图对右心室(RV)功能障碍的鉴定将为预后判断和临床决策提供依据。肺栓塞信息登记处(RIETE)是世界上最大的客观确诊肺栓塞患者登记处。现场报告的 RV 超声心动图测量结果的可靠性尚不清楚。我们旨在验证 RIETE 登记处报告的关键 RV 超声心动图测量结果。方法 随机抽取 51 例因急性 PE 而接受经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查的 RIETE 患者。由两名独立观察员组成的核心实验室对经胸超声心动图进行了去身份化分析,并对现场报告的数据进行了盲法处理。为了研究可靠性,在两名观察者之间以及两名观察者的平均值与 RIETE 现场报告数据之间获得了类内相关系数 (ICC) 和 Bland-Altman 图。结果 核心实验室观察者之间的差异非常有限,所有 TTE 参数的相关系数均大于 0.8。在三尖瓣环面收缩期偏移(ICC 0.728;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.594-0.862)和肺动脉收缩压(ICC 0.726;95% 置信区间 [CI],0.601-0.852)等关键参数上,核心实验室观察员与现场报告数据的一致性非常高。右心室与左心室直径比值(ICC 0.739;95% CI,0.443-1.000)的一致性得到了验证,但缺失数据限制了估计值的精确度。Bland-Altman图显示差异接近于零。结论 我们在 RIETE 登记中显示了关键 RV 现场报告测量值的高度可靠性。确定这些数据的有效性可增加后续调查的信心和可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信