Recovery bone formation on radiographic palatal bone dehiscences after incisor retraction with microimplants.

Ho-Jin Kim, Hyung-Kyu Noh, Hyo-Sang Park
{"title":"Recovery bone formation on radiographic palatal bone dehiscences after incisor retraction with microimplants.","authors":"Ho-Jin Kim, Hyung-Kyu Noh, Hyo-Sang Park","doi":"10.2319/081823-566.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the difference in labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness and height during the retention period after incisor retraction treatment with microimplant.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A sample of 21 patients (mean age: 17.80 ± 4.38 years) who underwent incisor retraction treatment using microimplants after premolar extraction was investigated. The cone-beam computed tomography images at pretreatment, posttreatment, and retention were used to measure anterior alveolar bone thickness (labial, palatal, and total; at three vertical levels) and height (labial and palatal) and differences in the incisor position during treatment or retention. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was performed to compare the variables at T0, T1, and T2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maxillary central incisor moved posteriorly by approximately 8.0 mm along with intrusive movement of 1.8 mm after treatment. The alveolar bone thickness significantly decreased on the palatal side and increased on the labial side after treatment. Thereafter, the palatal bone thickness significantly increased and labial bone thickness decreased during the retention period. The palatal interdental bone depressed by incisor retraction showed substantial bone deposition after retention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiographic palatal bone dehiscences on the incisor root and palatal bone depression between the incisor roots were apparent after treatment. This palatal bone loss around the incisor roots noticeably recovered with newly formed bone during retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10893923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/081823-566.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the difference in labial and palatal alveolar bone thickness and height during the retention period after incisor retraction treatment with microimplant.

Materials and methods: A sample of 21 patients (mean age: 17.80 ± 4.38 years) who underwent incisor retraction treatment using microimplants after premolar extraction was investigated. The cone-beam computed tomography images at pretreatment, posttreatment, and retention were used to measure anterior alveolar bone thickness (labial, palatal, and total; at three vertical levels) and height (labial and palatal) and differences in the incisor position during treatment or retention. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was performed to compare the variables at T0, T1, and T2.

Results: The maxillary central incisor moved posteriorly by approximately 8.0 mm along with intrusive movement of 1.8 mm after treatment. The alveolar bone thickness significantly decreased on the palatal side and increased on the labial side after treatment. Thereafter, the palatal bone thickness significantly increased and labial bone thickness decreased during the retention period. The palatal interdental bone depressed by incisor retraction showed substantial bone deposition after retention.

Conclusions: Radiographic palatal bone dehiscences on the incisor root and palatal bone depression between the incisor roots were apparent after treatment. This palatal bone loss around the incisor roots noticeably recovered with newly formed bone during retention.

使用微型植入体进行门牙牵引后,腭骨开裂处的放射成像骨形成。
目的研究使用微型种植体进行切牙牵引治疗后,在保留期内唇侧和腭侧牙槽骨厚度和高度的差异:对拔除前磨牙后使用微型种植体进行切牙牵引治疗的 21 名患者(平均年龄:17.80 ± 4.38 岁)进行抽样调查。使用锥形束计算机断层扫描图像测量治疗前、治疗后和保留期间的前牙槽骨厚度(唇、腭和总厚度;三个垂直水平)和高度(唇和腭),以及治疗或保留期间切牙位置的差异。对 T0、T1 和 T2 时的变量进行了重复测量方差分析,并进行了 Bonferroni 校正:结果:治疗后,上颌中切牙向后移动了约 8.0 毫米,侵入性移动 1.8 毫米。治疗后,腭侧牙槽骨厚度明显减少,唇侧牙槽骨厚度增加。此后,在保留期间,腭侧骨厚度明显增加,唇侧骨厚度减少。门牙退缩导致的腭侧牙间隙骨在保留后出现大量骨沉积:结论:门牙根部的腭骨开裂和门牙根部之间的腭骨凹陷在治疗后表现明显。门牙根部周围的腭骨缺损在保留期间通过新形成的骨质明显恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信