Intraoperative Kinematics in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Inserts.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-08 DOI:10.1055/a-2240-3336
Yoshikazu Sumida, Eisaku Fujimoto, Yasuji Masuda, Saori Ishibashi, Yoshiaki Sasashige
{"title":"Intraoperative Kinematics in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Inserts.","authors":"Yoshikazu Sumida, Eisaku Fujimoto, Yasuji Masuda, Saori Ishibashi, Yoshiaki Sasashige","doi":"10.1055/a-2240-3336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed the intraoperative kinematics of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a navigation system to investigate the influence of different inserts on kinematics. This was a retrospective observational study. The Vanguard individualized design (33 patients, 33 knees) XP and anterior-stabilized (AS) inserts were used in TKA for osteoarthritis. Kinematic data were intraoperatively recorded. The range of motion, tibiofemoral rotational angle, anteroposterior translation of the femur, and varus-valgus laxity were compared between the two inserts (XP vs. AS). There was no significant difference in the range of motion (extension: XP, 3.7° ± 3.3° vs. AS, 3.8° ± 3.3°, <i>p</i> = 0.84; flexion: XP, 138.1° ± 10.2° vs. AS, 139.0° ± 13.3°, <i>p</i> = 0.73). With the AS insert, the tibia was gradually internally rotated as the knee was flexed. At maximum extension, the internal rotation was smallest with AS (XP 6.5° ± 4.0° vs. AS 5.1° ± 3.4°, <i>p</i> = 0.022), which was also associated with smaller anterior femoral translation (maximum extension: XP, 14.1 ± 4.8 mm vs. AS, 11.3 ± 4.7 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.00036; 30°: XP, 23.7 ± 5.6 mm vs. AS, 20.7 ± 5.1 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.000033; 45°: XP, 24.4 ± 4.9 mm vs. AS, 23.2 ± 4.5 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.0038). The AS was associated with a lower varus-valgus laxity (30° XP 4.1° ± 3.4 vs. AS 3.3° ± 2.7°, <i>p</i> = 0.036; 60°: XP, 3.2° ± 3.0° vs. AS, 2.4° ± 3.3°, <i>p</i> = 0.0089). The AS insert facilitated sequential tibiofemoral rotation with varus-valgus stability in mid-flexion without restricting the range of motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"642-648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2240-3336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed the intraoperative kinematics of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a navigation system to investigate the influence of different inserts on kinematics. This was a retrospective observational study. The Vanguard individualized design (33 patients, 33 knees) XP and anterior-stabilized (AS) inserts were used in TKA for osteoarthritis. Kinematic data were intraoperatively recorded. The range of motion, tibiofemoral rotational angle, anteroposterior translation of the femur, and varus-valgus laxity were compared between the two inserts (XP vs. AS). There was no significant difference in the range of motion (extension: XP, 3.7° ± 3.3° vs. AS, 3.8° ± 3.3°, p = 0.84; flexion: XP, 138.1° ± 10.2° vs. AS, 139.0° ± 13.3°, p = 0.73). With the AS insert, the tibia was gradually internally rotated as the knee was flexed. At maximum extension, the internal rotation was smallest with AS (XP 6.5° ± 4.0° vs. AS 5.1° ± 3.4°, p = 0.022), which was also associated with smaller anterior femoral translation (maximum extension: XP, 14.1 ± 4.8 mm vs. AS, 11.3 ± 4.7 mm, p = 0.00036; 30°: XP, 23.7 ± 5.6 mm vs. AS, 20.7 ± 5.1 mm, p = 0.000033; 45°: XP, 24.4 ± 4.9 mm vs. AS, 23.2 ± 4.5 mm, p = 0.0038). The AS was associated with a lower varus-valgus laxity (30° XP 4.1° ± 3.4 vs. AS 3.3° ± 2.7°, p = 0.036; 60°: XP, 3.2° ± 3.0° vs. AS, 2.4° ± 3.3°, p = 0.0089). The AS insert facilitated sequential tibiofemoral rotation with varus-valgus stability in mid-flexion without restricting the range of motion.

使用不同假体进行后交叉韧带固定全膝关节置换术的术中运动学分析
我们分析了使用导航系统进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)的术中运动学情况,以研究不同插入物对运动学的影响。这是一项回顾性观察研究。在骨关节炎的TKA手术中使用了Vanguard个性化设计(ID)(33名患者,33个膝关节)XP和前稳定(AS)假体。术中记录了运动学数据。比较了两种假体(XP 与 AS)的运动范围、胫骨与股骨的旋转角度、股骨的前向平移以及屈曲-外翻松弛度。两者的活动范围无明显差异(伸展:XP,3.7° ± 3.5°;AS,3.7° ± 3.5°):XP,3.7° ± 3.3° vs AS,3.8° ± 3.3°,p=0.84;屈曲:XP,138.1° ± 10.2° vs AS,139.0° ± 13.3°,p=0.73)。使用 AS 假肢时,随着膝关节的屈曲,胫骨逐渐内旋。在最大伸展度时,AS的内旋幅度最小(XP 6.5°±4.0° vs. AS 5.1°±3.4°,p=0.022),这也与股骨前移幅度较小有关(最大伸展度:XP,14.1 mm ± 4.0 mm,p=0.022):XP,14.1 mm ± 4.8 mm vs AS,11.3 mm ± 4.7 mm,p=0.00036;30°:XP,23.7 mm ± 5.6 mm vs AS,20.7 mm ± 5.1 mm,p=0.000033;45°:XP,24.4 mm ± 4.6 mm vs AS,20.7 mm ± 5.1 mm,p=0.000033:XP,24.4 毫米 ± 4.9 毫米 vs AS,23.2 毫米 ± 4.5 毫米,p=0.0038)。AS与较低的屈曲-外翻松弛度相关(30°:XP 4.1°±3.4 vs AS 3.3°±2.7°,p=0.036;60°:XP 3.2°±3.7°,p=0.000033;45°:XP 24.4mm ± 4.9mm vs AS 23.2mm ± 4.5mm,p=0.0038):XP,3.2°±3.0° vs AS,2.4°±3.3°,p=0.0089)。AS 插入物有助于胫骨股骨的连续旋转,在屈曲中期具有变位-外翻稳定性,而不会限制运动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信