Role of Shear Wave Elastography of Placenta in Prediction of Preeclampsia in High-Risk Pregnancy.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tulika Singh, Shayeri Roy Choudhury, Mandeep Singh, Veenu Singla, Vanita Jain
{"title":"Role of Shear Wave Elastography of Placenta in Prediction of Preeclampsia in High-Risk Pregnancy.","authors":"Tulika Singh, Shayeri Roy Choudhury, Mandeep Singh, Veenu Singla, Vanita Jain","doi":"10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The aim of our study was to compare the placental elasticity values between normal pregnancies and preeclamptic pregnancies and evaluate the utility of shear-wave elastography of the placenta as a predictor for preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancy. A prospective study was performed with 90 singleton high-risk pregnancies having any of the 7 risk factors for developing preeclampsia (primigravida, history of preeclampsia, family history of preeclampsia, history of pregestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, advanced maternal age [≥40 years], and body mass index ≥26 kg/m 2 ) were enrolled in the study. Shear-wave elastography was performed in all patients at 20 to 24 weeks' gestation and at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation, at 2 sites: center and edge of the placenta. The patients were divided into 2 groups: normal pregnancies (group A) or developed preeclampsia (group B). Women with posterior placentation, obstetric disorders other than preeclampsia, or multiple gestation were excluded from the study. Group comparisons were done using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Shear-wave elasticity values at 20 to 24 weeks' gestation for group B at the center of the placenta (21.73 vs 9.72 kPa) and at the edge of the placenta (21.6 kPa vs 10.15 kPa) were significantly higher than those for group A ( P < 0.05). Similar results were seen at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation. With a cutoff of 13.1 kPa, we attained sensitivity of 95.2%, specificity of 92.8% and diagnostic accuracy of 93.3% for predicting development of preeclampsia. Patients with preeclampsia have a significantly higher stiffness of the placenta. Shear-wave elastography is useful to evaluate placental function. Elastography can be used as a supplementary tool for prediction of preeclampsia.</p>","PeriodicalId":49116,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000662","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of our study was to compare the placental elasticity values between normal pregnancies and preeclamptic pregnancies and evaluate the utility of shear-wave elastography of the placenta as a predictor for preeclampsia in high-risk pregnancy. A prospective study was performed with 90 singleton high-risk pregnancies having any of the 7 risk factors for developing preeclampsia (primigravida, history of preeclampsia, family history of preeclampsia, history of pregestational diabetes, chronic hypertension, advanced maternal age [≥40 years], and body mass index ≥26 kg/m 2 ) were enrolled in the study. Shear-wave elastography was performed in all patients at 20 to 24 weeks' gestation and at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation, at 2 sites: center and edge of the placenta. The patients were divided into 2 groups: normal pregnancies (group A) or developed preeclampsia (group B). Women with posterior placentation, obstetric disorders other than preeclampsia, or multiple gestation were excluded from the study. Group comparisons were done using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Shear-wave elasticity values at 20 to 24 weeks' gestation for group B at the center of the placenta (21.73 vs 9.72 kPa) and at the edge of the placenta (21.6 kPa vs 10.15 kPa) were significantly higher than those for group A ( P < 0.05). Similar results were seen at 34 to 36 weeks' gestation. With a cutoff of 13.1 kPa, we attained sensitivity of 95.2%, specificity of 92.8% and diagnostic accuracy of 93.3% for predicting development of preeclampsia. Patients with preeclampsia have a significantly higher stiffness of the placenta. Shear-wave elastography is useful to evaluate placental function. Elastography can be used as a supplementary tool for prediction of preeclampsia.

胎盘剪切波弹性成像在预测高危妊娠子痫前期中的作用
摘要:我们的研究旨在比较正常妊娠和子痫前期妊娠的胎盘弹性值,并评估胎盘剪切波弹性成像作为高危妊娠子痫前期预测指标的实用性。这项前瞻性研究共纳入了90名单胎高危妊娠,这些妊娠均具有发生子痫前期的7个危险因素(初产妇、子痫前期病史、子痫前期家族史、妊娠糖尿病史、慢性高血压、高龄产妇[≥40岁]和体重指数≥26 kg/m2)。所有患者均在妊娠 20-24 周和 34-36 周时在胎盘中心和边缘两个部位进行了剪切波弹性成像。患者被分为两组:正常妊娠(A 组)或先兆子痫(B 组)。患有后置胎盘、先兆子痫以外的产科疾病或多胎妊娠的妇女被排除在研究之外。组间比较采用χ2检验或费雪精确检验。妊娠20至24周时,B组胎盘中心(21.73 kPa vs 9.72 kPa)和胎盘边缘(21.6 kPa vs 10.15 kPa)的剪切波弹性值明显高于A组(P < 0.05)。妊娠 34 至 36 周时也出现了类似的结果。以 13.1 kPa 为临界值,我们预测子痫前期的灵敏度为 95.2%,特异度为 92.8%,诊断准确率为 93.3%。子痫前期患者的胎盘硬度明显较高。剪切波弹性成像可用于评估胎盘功能。弹性成像可作为预测子痫前期的辅助工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Quarterly
Ultrasound Quarterly RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ultrasound Quarterly provides coverage of the newest, most sophisticated ultrasound techniques as well as in-depth analysis of important developments in this dynamic field. The journal publishes reviews of a wide variety of topics including trans-vaginal ultrasonography, detection of fetal anomalies, color Doppler flow imaging, pediatric ultrasonography, and breast sonography. Official Journal of the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信