[Analysing the Need for Long-Term Care: Potential of Data from Long-Term Care Assessments of the Bavarian Medical Service for Public Health Research and Practice].

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gesundheitswesen Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-09 DOI:10.1055/a-2189-2064
Johanna Schütz, Marie-Christin Redlich, Florian Fischer
{"title":"[Analysing the Need for Long-Term Care: Potential of Data from Long-Term Care Assessments of the Bavarian Medical Service for Public Health Research and Practice].","authors":"Johanna Schütz, Marie-Christin Redlich, Florian Fischer","doi":"10.1055/a-2189-2064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite demographic changes, there is still no systematic and comparable differentiation of nursing care reporting on a small-scale level in Germany, where outpatient long-term care is depicted. This article presents findings of care assessment data of the Medical Service of Bavaria and draws conclusions for future reporting on nursing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For the analysis, anonymised initial long-term care assessments of the Bavarian Medical Service of 2019 were evaluated exemplarily using descriptive methods. The study describes the characteristics of persons with a care level recommendation, the distribution of care level categories, medical diagnoses and degree of independence in the areas of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The persons assessed were on average 80 years old. At the time of the initial assessment, the largest proportion of persons with an assigned care level lived in an outpatient setting. Care level (PG) 1 (slight impairment of independence or abilities) was assigned to 35.1% of the insured, PG 2 (considerable impairment) to 43.1%, PG 3 (severe impairment) to 16.6%, PG 4 and 5 (most severe impairment) were each rarely assigned at the time of the initial assessment (3.9% and 1.4%, respectively). Medical diagnoses were dominated by gait and mobility disorders, unspecified dementia, heart failure and senility. In particular, there were impairments in the areas of 'mobility' and 'organisation of everyday life and social contacts'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data available from the German Medical Service may be highly relevant to health research and policy and may provide a basis for planning interventions in long-term care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2189-2064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite demographic changes, there is still no systematic and comparable differentiation of nursing care reporting on a small-scale level in Germany, where outpatient long-term care is depicted. This article presents findings of care assessment data of the Medical Service of Bavaria and draws conclusions for future reporting on nursing.

Methods: For the analysis, anonymised initial long-term care assessments of the Bavarian Medical Service of 2019 were evaluated exemplarily using descriptive methods. The study describes the characteristics of persons with a care level recommendation, the distribution of care level categories, medical diagnoses and degree of independence in the areas of life.

Results: The persons assessed were on average 80 years old. At the time of the initial assessment, the largest proportion of persons with an assigned care level lived in an outpatient setting. Care level (PG) 1 (slight impairment of independence or abilities) was assigned to 35.1% of the insured, PG 2 (considerable impairment) to 43.1%, PG 3 (severe impairment) to 16.6%, PG 4 and 5 (most severe impairment) were each rarely assigned at the time of the initial assessment (3.9% and 1.4%, respectively). Medical diagnoses were dominated by gait and mobility disorders, unspecified dementia, heart failure and senility. In particular, there were impairments in the areas of 'mobility' and 'organisation of everyday life and social contacts'.

Conclusions: The data available from the German Medical Service may be highly relevant to health research and policy and may provide a basis for planning interventions in long-term care.

[分析长期护理需求:巴伐利亚医疗服务长期护理评估数据在公共卫生研究与实践中的潜力]。
背景:尽管人口结构发生了变化,但在门诊长期护理方面,德国仍未在小范围内对护理报告进行系统性和可比性的区分。本文介绍了巴伐利亚州医疗服务机构的护理评估数据,并为今后的护理报告得出结论:为了进行分析,采用描述性方法对 2019 年巴伐利亚医疗服务机构的匿名初步长期护理评估进行了示范性评估。研究描述了获得护理等级建议的人员的特征、护理等级类别的分布、医疗诊断和生活领域的独立程度:被评估者平均年龄为 80 岁。在初次评估时,有指定护理级别的人中居住在门诊环境中的比例最大。35.1%的受保人被划分为护理等级(PG)1(独立性或能力轻微受损),43.1%的受保人被划分为护理等级(PG)2(能力严重受损),16.6%的受保人被划分为护理等级(PG)3(能力严重受损),在初次评估时,很少有人被划分为护理等级(PG)4和护理等级(PG)5(能力最严重受损)(分别为3.9%和1.4%)。医疗诊断主要是步态和行动障碍、不明原因的痴呆、心力衰竭和衰老。特别是在 "行动能力 "和 "组织日常生活和社会交往 "方面存在障碍:德国医疗服务机构提供的数据可能与健康研究和政策高度相关,并可为规划长期护理干预措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信