Nathan Esplin, Dorian Kusyk, Seung W Jeong, Shahed Elhamdani, Khaled Abdel Aziz, Amanda Webb, Cindy Angle, Donald Whiting, Nestor D. Tomycz
{"title":"Movement disorder Deep brain stimulation Hybridization: Patient and caregiver outcomes","authors":"Nathan Esplin, Dorian Kusyk, Seung W Jeong, Shahed Elhamdani, Khaled Abdel Aziz, Amanda Webb, Cindy Angle, Donald Whiting, Nestor D. Tomycz","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2024.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical treatment for certain movement disorders and involves the implantation of brain electrodes connected to implantable pulse generators (IPGs). As more device manufacturers have entered the market, some IPG technology has been designed to be compatible with brain electrodes from other manufacturers, which has facilitated the hybridization of implant technology. The aim of this study was to assess the benefits of hybridization of non-rechargeable, constant voltage IPGs to rechargeable, constant current IPGs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A list of DBS movement disorder patients who had their non-rechargeable, constant voltage IPGs replaced with rechargeable, constant current IPGs from a different manufacturer was compiled. Structured surveys of these patients, and their caregivers when applicable, were undertaken to determine both patient and caregiver satisfaction in this DBS hybridization strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria and twelve patients or their caregivers completed the structured survey (67% response rate). Nine patients had Parkinson’s disease (75%), three had essential tremor (25%). Nine (75%) were converted from bilateral single-channel IPGs, and three (25%) were converted from a unilateral dual-channel IPGs. Overall, 92% of patients and caregivers surveyed reported improvement or no change in their symptoms, 92% reported a decrease or no change in their medication requirements, and 92% report they are satisfied or very satisfied with their IPG hybridization and would recommend the surgery to similar patients. There were no immediate surgical complications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this series of movement disorder DBS patients, surgery was safe and patient and caregiver satisfaction were high with a hybridization of non-rechargeable, constant voltage IPGs to rechargeable, constant current IPGs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112524000033/pdfft?md5=43a1929caa2886be8101445aa9f2f19a&pid=1-s2.0-S2590112524000033-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112524000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Objectives
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established surgical treatment for certain movement disorders and involves the implantation of brain electrodes connected to implantable pulse generators (IPGs). As more device manufacturers have entered the market, some IPG technology has been designed to be compatible with brain electrodes from other manufacturers, which has facilitated the hybridization of implant technology. The aim of this study was to assess the benefits of hybridization of non-rechargeable, constant voltage IPGs to rechargeable, constant current IPGs.
Methods
A list of DBS movement disorder patients who had their non-rechargeable, constant voltage IPGs replaced with rechargeable, constant current IPGs from a different manufacturer was compiled. Structured surveys of these patients, and their caregivers when applicable, were undertaken to determine both patient and caregiver satisfaction in this DBS hybridization strategy.
Results
Eighteen patients met inclusion criteria and twelve patients or their caregivers completed the structured survey (67% response rate). Nine patients had Parkinson’s disease (75%), three had essential tremor (25%). Nine (75%) were converted from bilateral single-channel IPGs, and three (25%) were converted from a unilateral dual-channel IPGs. Overall, 92% of patients and caregivers surveyed reported improvement or no change in their symptoms, 92% reported a decrease or no change in their medication requirements, and 92% report they are satisfied or very satisfied with their IPG hybridization and would recommend the surgery to similar patients. There were no immediate surgical complications.
Conclusion
In this series of movement disorder DBS patients, surgery was safe and patient and caregiver satisfaction were high with a hybridization of non-rechargeable, constant voltage IPGs to rechargeable, constant current IPGs.