Teachers’ use of inquiry and language scaffolding questions when preparing an experiment

Q3 Social Sciences
Anne Bergliot Øyehaug, Marilyn Kouns, E. Savelsbergh
{"title":"Teachers’ use of inquiry and language scaffolding questions when preparing an experiment","authors":"Anne Bergliot Øyehaug, Marilyn Kouns, E. Savelsbergh","doi":"10.30935/scimath/14074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyze data from three national contexts in which teachers worked with the same teaching materials and inquiry classroom activities, investigating teachers’ use of strategies to promote interaction and scaffolding when participating in a professional development program. The data material is collected from three case studies from the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden, respectively. Each case is from a teaching unit about green plants and seed sprouting. In one lesson in this unit, students were involved in planning an experiment with sprouting seeds, and this (similar) lesson was videotaped in three national settings. The main research question is, as follows: How do primary teachers use questions to scaffold conceptual understanding and language use in inquiry science activities? The data analysis shows that teachers ask different kind of questions such as open, closed, influencing and orienting questions. The open, orienting questions induce students to generate their own ideas, while closed orienting and influencing questions often scaffold language and content-specific meaning-making. However, both open, closed, orienting and influencing questions can scaffold student language and conceptual understanding. Often, teacher questions scaffold both language content-specific meaning-making at the same time. The study shows the subtle mechanisms through which teachers can use questions to scaffold student science literacy and thereby including them in classroom interaction.","PeriodicalId":36049,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"83 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/14074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyze data from three national contexts in which teachers worked with the same teaching materials and inquiry classroom activities, investigating teachers’ use of strategies to promote interaction and scaffolding when participating in a professional development program. The data material is collected from three case studies from the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden, respectively. Each case is from a teaching unit about green plants and seed sprouting. In one lesson in this unit, students were involved in planning an experiment with sprouting seeds, and this (similar) lesson was videotaped in three national settings. The main research question is, as follows: How do primary teachers use questions to scaffold conceptual understanding and language use in inquiry science activities? The data analysis shows that teachers ask different kind of questions such as open, closed, influencing and orienting questions. The open, orienting questions induce students to generate their own ideas, while closed orienting and influencing questions often scaffold language and content-specific meaning-making. However, both open, closed, orienting and influencing questions can scaffold student language and conceptual understanding. Often, teacher questions scaffold both language content-specific meaning-making at the same time. The study shows the subtle mechanisms through which teachers can use questions to scaffold student science literacy and thereby including them in classroom interaction.
教师在准备实验时使用的探究和语言支架问题
本研究分析了三个国家教师使用相同教材和开展探究课堂活动的数据,调查了教师在参加专业发展项目时使用促进互动和支架的策略的情况。数据资料分别来自荷兰、挪威和瑞典的三个案例研究。每个案例都来自一个关于绿色植物和种子萌发的教学单元。在这一单元的一堂课中,学生们参与策划了一个种子发芽的实验,这堂(类似的)课在三个国家的教学环境中都进行了录像。主要研究问题如下在科学探究活动中,小学教师如何使用问题来帮助学生理解概念和使用语言?数据分析显示,教师提出了不同类型的问题,如开放性问题、封闭性问题、影响性问题和导向性问题。开放式的定向问题诱导学生产生自己的想法,而封闭式的定向问题和影响性问题往往为语言和特定内容的意义建构提供支架。然而,开放式、封闭式、导向性和影响性问题都能帮助学生理解语言和概念。通常情况下,教师的问题会同时为语言和特定内容的意义建构提供支架。这项研究显示了教师利用问题为学生的科学素养提供支架,从而将他们纳入课堂互动的微妙机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信