Comparative cohort study of paraspinal muscle volume change between uniportal full endoscopic and mini open posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Q4 Medicine
Hyeun Sung Kim , Pang Hung Wu
{"title":"Comparative cohort study of paraspinal muscle volume change between uniportal full endoscopic and mini open posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion","authors":"Hyeun Sung Kim ,&nbsp;Pang Hung Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.semss.2024.101081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recent literature of uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion<span> demonstrates good clinical and radiological outcomes with minimally invasive benefits of potentially preserving paraspinal muscle. There is no literature on paraspinal muscle volume change between the endoscopic and microscopic mini open interbody fusion.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>We included patients who met the indication criteria for lumbar fusion and underwent either uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical parameters of visual analog scale<span> and Oswestry disability index were measured at preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 3 months postoperative and final follow up. Magnetic Resonance Imaging measurement of preoperative and postoperative Kjaer grade, right and left </span></span>psoas muscle mass area, right and left paraspinal muscle mass area were performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>74 levels of Endo-TLIF and 42 patients with mini open TLIF (MIS-TLIF) were included. There was statistically significant greater improvement in VAS and ODI in Endo-TLIF cohort at 1 week significant improvement of Kjaer grade at postoperative 1 year in Endo-TLIF compared to MIS-TLIF. There is statistically significant improvement in paraspinal muscle mass area in Endo-TLIF (104.83 ± 316.45) mm2 compared to MIS-TLIF (89.88 ± 185.14) mm2</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Uniportal Endoscopic Posterolateral Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion achieved improved paraspinal and psoas muscle bulk and less fatty infiltration in the operated level as compared to mini open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion while both cohorts achieved equivalent positive clinical outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39884,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","volume":"36 1","pages":"Article 101081"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738324000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent literature of uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion demonstrates good clinical and radiological outcomes with minimally invasive benefits of potentially preserving paraspinal muscle. There is no literature on paraspinal muscle volume change between the endoscopic and microscopic mini open interbody fusion.

Methods

We included patients who met the indication criteria for lumbar fusion and underwent either uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical parameters of visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index were measured at preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 3 months postoperative and final follow up. Magnetic Resonance Imaging measurement of preoperative and postoperative Kjaer grade, right and left psoas muscle mass area, right and left paraspinal muscle mass area were performed.

Results

74 levels of Endo-TLIF and 42 patients with mini open TLIF (MIS-TLIF) were included. There was statistically significant greater improvement in VAS and ODI in Endo-TLIF cohort at 1 week significant improvement of Kjaer grade at postoperative 1 year in Endo-TLIF compared to MIS-TLIF. There is statistically significant improvement in paraspinal muscle mass area in Endo-TLIF (104.83 ± 316.45) mm2 compared to MIS-TLIF (89.88 ± 185.14) mm2

Conclusion

Uniportal Endoscopic Posterolateral Lumbar Transforaminal Interbody Fusion achieved improved paraspinal and psoas muscle bulk and less fatty infiltration in the operated level as compared to mini open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion while both cohorts achieved equivalent positive clinical outcomes.

单孔全内镜与迷你开放后外侧经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术后脊柱旁肌肉体积变化的队列比较研究
背景最近关于单孔全内镜后外侧经椎间孔腰椎椎体融合术的文献显示,该手术具有良好的临床和放射学效果,且具有保留脊柱旁肌肉的微创优势。我们纳入了符合腰椎融合术适应症标准并接受单孔全内镜后外侧经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术或开放式经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术的患者。在术前、术后 1 周、术后 3 个月和最后随访时测量了视觉模拟量表和 Oswestry 残疾指数等临床参数。对术前和术后的 Kjaer 分级、左右腰肌面积、左右脊柱旁肌面积进行了磁共振成像测量。与 MIS-TLIF 相比,Endo-TLIF 患者在术后 1 周的 VAS 和 ODI 有明显改善,术后 1 年的 Kjaer 分级也有明显改善。结论与迷你开腹腰椎间盘融合术相比,单孔内镜后外侧腰椎穿孔椎间融合术改善了脊柱旁和腰肌的体积,减少了手术水平的脂肪浸润,同时两组患者都取得了同等的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Spine Surgery
Seminars in Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
2 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Spine Surgery is a continuing source of current, clinical information for practicing surgeons. Under the direction of a specially selected guest editor, each issue addresses a single topic in the management and care of patients. Topics covered in each issue include basic anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management options and follow-up of the condition under consideration. The journal also features "Spinescope," a special section providing summaries of articles from other journals that are of relevance to the understanding of ongoing research related to the treatment of spinal disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信