The proximal distant: How does remote acculturation affect wellbeing in the multicultural context of Lebanon?

Noura Soubra , Lucy Tavitian-Elmadjian , Byron Adams
{"title":"The proximal distant: How does remote acculturation affect wellbeing in the multicultural context of Lebanon?","authors":"Noura Soubra ,&nbsp;Lucy Tavitian-Elmadjian ,&nbsp;Byron Adams","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2024.100183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a multicultural context, Lebanon has been subjected to complex cultural influences across history and has no clear cultural delineations. Lebanese currently choose to maintain or abandon a combination of four local cultural identities (sectarian, religious, national, and supranational). They may also choose to adopt postcolonial French culture and/or remotely acculturate to American culture. In this unique Middle Eastern context, we specifically examined Americanization in relation to well-being. Using a cross-sectional design, we analyzed data from 741 participants aged 18–40. We identified several cultural clusters from measures of identity and behavioral orientations towards one's self-ascribed sectarian, Arab, religious, national, postcolonial French, and American cultural indicators. Cluster analysis indicated the existence of three clusters within the sample: a national multicultural Americanized cluster (23%), a religious multicultural Americanized cluster (40%), and a religious multicultural traditional cluster (37%). The clusters’ composition and characteristics potentially reflect historical and current events related to the political and social fabric of the country and the region (e.g., the Arab Nationalist Movement, the recent national uprising). In addition, we compared psychological well-being across clusters; the analyses demonstrated significant differences. Universally, our results highlight the importance of maintaining a positive attitude towards one's local culture(s) to protect one's well-being and indicate that Americanization extends beyond adolescence and the emerging adulthood periods into adulthood. At the societal level, the emergence of a cluster prioritizing national identity encourages efforts to promote a superordinate national identity and could be indicative of a significant shift within the Lebanese social and political fabric.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000042/pdfft?md5=9c633156d9e81e8821e5d9d1aa197543&pid=1-s2.0-S2666622724000042-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622724000042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a multicultural context, Lebanon has been subjected to complex cultural influences across history and has no clear cultural delineations. Lebanese currently choose to maintain or abandon a combination of four local cultural identities (sectarian, religious, national, and supranational). They may also choose to adopt postcolonial French culture and/or remotely acculturate to American culture. In this unique Middle Eastern context, we specifically examined Americanization in relation to well-being. Using a cross-sectional design, we analyzed data from 741 participants aged 18–40. We identified several cultural clusters from measures of identity and behavioral orientations towards one's self-ascribed sectarian, Arab, religious, national, postcolonial French, and American cultural indicators. Cluster analysis indicated the existence of three clusters within the sample: a national multicultural Americanized cluster (23%), a religious multicultural Americanized cluster (40%), and a religious multicultural traditional cluster (37%). The clusters’ composition and characteristics potentially reflect historical and current events related to the political and social fabric of the country and the region (e.g., the Arab Nationalist Movement, the recent national uprising). In addition, we compared psychological well-being across clusters; the analyses demonstrated significant differences. Universally, our results highlight the importance of maintaining a positive attitude towards one's local culture(s) to protect one's well-being and indicate that Americanization extends beyond adolescence and the emerging adulthood periods into adulthood. At the societal level, the emergence of a cluster prioritizing national identity encourages efforts to promote a superordinate national identity and could be indicative of a significant shift within the Lebanese social and political fabric.

Abstract Image

近在咫尺的远方:在黎巴嫩的多元文化背景下,远方的文化适应如何影响福祉?
作为一个多元文化背景的国家,黎巴嫩在历史上受到了复杂的文化影响,没有明确的文 化界限。黎巴嫩人目前选择保持或放弃四种当地文化身份(教派、宗教、民族和超国家)的组合。他们也可以选择接受后殖民时期的法国文化和/或远程融入美国文化。在这种独特的中东背景下,我们专门研究了美国化与幸福感的关系。我们采用横截面设计,分析了 741 名 18-40 岁参与者的数据。通过对自我描述的教派、阿拉伯、宗教、民族、后殖民时期法国和美国文化指标的身份和行为取向的测量,我们确定了几个文化集群。聚类分析表明,样本中存在三个聚类:民族多元文化美国化聚类(23%)、宗教多元文化美国化聚类(40%)和宗教多元文化传统聚类(37%)。这些群组的构成和特征可能反映了与该国和该地区的政治和社会结构有关的历史和当前事件(如阿拉伯民族主义运动、最近的民族起义)。此外,我们还比较了不同群组的心理健康情况;分析结果显示了显著的差异。从总体上看,我们的研究结果凸显了对自己的本土文化保持积极态度对保护个人幸福的重要性,并表明美国化已经超越了青春期和成年期,进入了成年期。在社会层面上,民族身份优先群组的出现鼓励人们努力促进上位民族身份,这可能表明黎巴嫩社会和政治结构发生了重大转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信