Ponzi schemes in Brazil: what leads people to still invest in this fraud?

Q1 Social Sciences
Thiago Da Silva Telles Constantino, Antônio Carlos Magalhães Da Silva, Maria Aline Moreira De Oliveira Constantino
{"title":"Ponzi schemes in Brazil: what leads people to still invest in this fraud?","authors":"Thiago Da Silva Telles Constantino, Antônio Carlos Magalhães Da Silva, Maria Aline Moreira De Oliveira Constantino","doi":"10.1108/jfc-10-2023-0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMost scientific research has focused on understanding Ponzi schemes from the point of view of the schemes and their operators, based on qualitative analysis. This paper aims to analyze Ponzi schemes from the perspective of their investors, emphasizing behavioral aspects, which have been little explored in the scientific literature, especially in quantitative research. In this way, the authors sought to understand the effects of heuristics and cognitive biases in understanding investor behavior.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA logistic regression was carried out with Brazilian investors, some of them participants in Ponzi schemes, who answered a structured questionnaire by means of a survey.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found that social pressures, overconfidence and deliberate ignorance lead to credulity, generating little risk analysis and the desire to make a lot of money quickly.\n\n\nPractical implications\nHelping investors improve their levels of information through financial education and self-knowledge about their behavior. Contribute to the competent authorities in the search for improvements in the information displayed to investors.\n\n\nSocial implications\nUnderstanding the mechanisms used when making a financial decision from the point of view of investors in general, but especially those exposed to Ponzi schemes, has the mission of enlightening them about the importance of financial education and the weight of psychological factors so that they can reduce the effects of heuristics and analysis biases when faced with a financial decision.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe basis of this work will be the inclusion of psychological variables and financial education, adapting existing models in an attempt to demonstrate the effects they may or may not have on mental accounting in the specific case of investors\n","PeriodicalId":38940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Crime","volume":"11 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfc-10-2023-0262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Most scientific research has focused on understanding Ponzi schemes from the point of view of the schemes and their operators, based on qualitative analysis. This paper aims to analyze Ponzi schemes from the perspective of their investors, emphasizing behavioral aspects, which have been little explored in the scientific literature, especially in quantitative research. In this way, the authors sought to understand the effects of heuristics and cognitive biases in understanding investor behavior. Design/methodology/approach A logistic regression was carried out with Brazilian investors, some of them participants in Ponzi schemes, who answered a structured questionnaire by means of a survey. Findings The authors found that social pressures, overconfidence and deliberate ignorance lead to credulity, generating little risk analysis and the desire to make a lot of money quickly. Practical implications Helping investors improve their levels of information through financial education and self-knowledge about their behavior. Contribute to the competent authorities in the search for improvements in the information displayed to investors. Social implications Understanding the mechanisms used when making a financial decision from the point of view of investors in general, but especially those exposed to Ponzi schemes, has the mission of enlightening them about the importance of financial education and the weight of psychological factors so that they can reduce the effects of heuristics and analysis biases when faced with a financial decision. Originality/value The basis of this work will be the inclusion of psychological variables and financial education, adapting existing models in an attempt to demonstrate the effects they may or may not have on mental accounting in the specific case of investors
巴西的庞氏骗局:是什么导致人们仍然投资于这种骗局?
目的 大多数科学研究都是从庞氏骗局及其经营者的角度出发,基于定性分析来理解庞氏骗局。本文旨在从庞氏骗局投资者的角度分析庞氏骗局,强调行为方面的问题,而这些问题在科学文献中,尤其是定量研究中鲜有涉及。通过这种方式,作者试图了解启发式思维和认知偏差对理解投资者行为的影响。设计/方法/途径对巴西投资者进行了逻辑回归,其中一些投资者是庞氏骗局的参与者,他们通过调查回答了结构化问卷。研究结果作者发现,社会压力、过度自信和故意无知会导致轻信、产生很少的风险分析和快速赚取大量金钱的愿望。社会意义从一般投资者的角度,尤其是那些接触过庞氏骗局的投资者的角度,了解他们在做出金融决策时所使用的机制,其使命是启发他们认识到金融教育的重要性和心理因素的重要性,从而使他们在面对金融决策时能够减少启发式和分析偏差的影响。原创性/价值这项工作的基础将是纳入心理变量和金融教育,对现有模型进行调整,试图在投资者的具体情况下证明它们对心理会计可能产生或可能不产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Crime
Journal of Financial Crime Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Crime, the leading journal in this field, publishes authoritative, practical and detailed insight in the most serious and topical issues relating to the control and prevention of financial crime and related abuse. The journal''s articles are authored by some of the leading international scholars and practitioners in the fields of law, criminology, economics, criminal justice and compliance. Consequently, articles are perceptive, evidence based and have policy impact. The journal covers a wide range of current topics including, but not limited to: • Tracing through the civil law of the proceeds of fraud • Cyber-crime: prevention and detection • Intelligence led investigations • Whistleblowing and the payment of rewards for information • Identity fraud • Insider dealing prosecutions • Specialised anti-corruption investigations • Underground banking systems • Asset tracing and forfeiture • Securities regulation and enforcement • Tax regimes and tax avoidance • Deferred prosecution agreements • Personal liability of compliance managers and professional advisers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信