MANUAL VACUUM ASPIRATION VERSUS DILTATION AND CURETTGE TERMINATION OF FIRST TRIMESTER ABORTION AMONG WOMEN ADMITTED AL-SADAQA TEATCHING HOSPITAL, ADEN JAN1st DECEMBER 31st 2020

Rasha Mohammed Ali Al-Daweel, Nahla S. Al.kaaky
{"title":"MANUAL VACUUM ASPIRATION VERSUS DILTATION AND CURETTGE TERMINATION OF FIRST TRIMESTER ABORTION AMONG WOMEN ADMITTED AL-SADAQA TEATCHING HOSPITAL, ADEN JAN1st DECEMBER 31st 2020","authors":"Rasha Mohammed Ali Al-Daweel, Nahla S. Al.kaaky","doi":"10.47372/ejua-ba.2023.4.305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early pregnancy failure is a medical complication and major health problem across the globe. The aim of this study is to compare manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and dilatation and curettage (D&C) for first trimester abortion, in terms of the efficiency of eliminating retain product of conceptus, frequency of complications, duration of the procedure, and duration of patients' hospitalization. This is a prospective comparative descriptive study performed at Al-Sadaqa Teaching Hospital. Over a period from 1st Jan 2020 to 31st December 2020, a total of 143 women, these patients either MVA group (n=72) or D&C group (n=71). Presented with spontaneous abortion and gestational age less than 12 weeks, patent cervix, and no signs of septic abortion, hemoglobin ≥9 g/dl and no bleeding disorder. Data was collected on prescribed questionnaire. The total number of abortion 637 in compare to 259 (40.7%) patient with first trimester abortion,  143 patients  was included in this study, MVA group (n =72) and D&C group (n=71).  The distribution in respect to the age, parity & gestational age was similar in both groups.  The mean duration of procedure was significantly higher (P<0.05) in D&C group compared to MVA group. The duration of hospital stay was significantly lower (P<0.05) in MVA group compared to D&C group. MVA group showed the least incidence of complications regarding the amount of blood loss, and cervical laceration. Complete evacuation was achieved in 95.8% in MVA vs. 98.6% in D&C group with no statically significant (P=0.304). MVA is as effective as popular dilatation and curettage for treatment of early pregnancy failure while it need less time consuming, requires a shorter hospital stay and subsequently costs less. It does not require general anesthesia and complication rate is less than dilatation and curettage. So it can be easily accessible to the woman of both rural and urban societies belonging to any socioeconomic strata especially where high tech equipment and power supply are not available.","PeriodicalId":11552,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of University of Aden for Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of University of Aden for Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47372/ejua-ba.2023.4.305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early pregnancy failure is a medical complication and major health problem across the globe. The aim of this study is to compare manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and dilatation and curettage (D&C) for first trimester abortion, in terms of the efficiency of eliminating retain product of conceptus, frequency of complications, duration of the procedure, and duration of patients' hospitalization. This is a prospective comparative descriptive study performed at Al-Sadaqa Teaching Hospital. Over a period from 1st Jan 2020 to 31st December 2020, a total of 143 women, these patients either MVA group (n=72) or D&C group (n=71). Presented with spontaneous abortion and gestational age less than 12 weeks, patent cervix, and no signs of septic abortion, hemoglobin ≥9 g/dl and no bleeding disorder. Data was collected on prescribed questionnaire. The total number of abortion 637 in compare to 259 (40.7%) patient with first trimester abortion,  143 patients  was included in this study, MVA group (n =72) and D&C group (n=71).  The distribution in respect to the age, parity & gestational age was similar in both groups.  The mean duration of procedure was significantly higher (P<0.05) in D&C group compared to MVA group. The duration of hospital stay was significantly lower (P<0.05) in MVA group compared to D&C group. MVA group showed the least incidence of complications regarding the amount of blood loss, and cervical laceration. Complete evacuation was achieved in 95.8% in MVA vs. 98.6% in D&C group with no statically significant (P=0.304). MVA is as effective as popular dilatation and curettage for treatment of early pregnancy failure while it need less time consuming, requires a shorter hospital stay and subsequently costs less. It does not require general anesthesia and complication rate is less than dilatation and curettage. So it can be easily accessible to the woman of both rural and urban societies belonging to any socioeconomic strata especially where high tech equipment and power supply are not available.
2020 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日在亚丁 AL-SADAQA 接种医院住院的第一胎流产妇女的手动吸宫术与取卵术和刮宫术的比较
早孕失败是一种医疗并发症,也是全球的主要健康问题。本研究的目的是比较人工真空吸引术(MVA)和扩张刮宫术(D&C)在第一胎人工流产中清除胎儿残留产物的效率、并发症发生频率、手术时间和患者住院时间。这是一项在 Al-Sadaqa 教学医院进行的前瞻性比较描述性研究。在 2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间,共有 143 名妇女接受了 MVA 组(72 人)或 D&C 组(71 人)的治疗。这些患者均为自然流产,胎龄小于 12 周,宫颈通畅,无化脓性流产迹象,血红蛋白≥9 g/dl,无出血性疾病。数据通过规定的问卷收集。流产总数为 637 例,其中 259 例(40.7%)为头三个月流产,143 例为 MVA 组(n=72)和 D&C 组(n=71)。 两组患者的年龄、奇偶数和孕龄分布相似。 与 MVA 组相比,D&C 组的平均手术时间明显较长(P<0.05)。与顺产组相比,MVA 组的住院时间明显较短(P<0.05)。在失血量和宫颈裂伤方面,MVA 组的并发症发生率最低。MVA组有95.8%的患者实现了完全排空,而D&C组为98.6%,无统计学意义(P=0.304)。在治疗早期妊娠失败方面,子宫内膜剥脱术与流行的扩张和刮宫术同样有效,而且耗时更短,住院时间更短,费用也更低。它不需要全身麻醉,并发症发生率也低于扩张和刮宫术。因此,无论是农村还是城市,任何社会经济阶层的妇女都可以很容易地使用这种方法,尤其是在没有高科技设备和电力供应的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信