Feasibility of Microalgal Concentrates for Production of Post Set Northern Quahogs, Mercenaria mercenaria and Sunray Venus Clams, Macrocallista nimbosa

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES
Edward Perri, Md Mahbubul Hassan, S. Laramore
{"title":"Feasibility of Microalgal Concentrates for Production of Post Set Northern Quahogs, Mercenaria mercenaria and Sunray Venus Clams, Macrocallista nimbosa","authors":"Edward Perri, Md Mahbubul Hassan, S. Laramore","doi":"10.2983/035.042.0303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Owing to the high cost of microalgal production for bivalve culture, a need for alternatives to live microalgal diets exists, particularly in facilities where space and personnel required for live microalgal culture are limited. This study examined the feasibility of utilizing commercially available microalgal concentrates in place of or in addition to live microalgae as a feed for post set northern quahogs (= hard clams), Mercenaria mercenaria and sunray Venus clams, Macrocallista nimbosa. Clams were fed one of six dietary treatments for 6 wk, and growth, survival, and fatty acid (FA) profiles were evaluated. Treatments included two live microalgal diets Tisochrysis lutea and T. lutea + Chaetoceros neogracile, which served as controls for complete or partial replacements with two commercially available concentrate products, ISO 1800 and Shellfish Diet 1800. The production of both clam species was negatively impacted compared with the live microalgae controls when only concentrates were fed. Survival decreased by 29–33% for hard clams and 42–62% for sunrays; a similar decrease in the growth rate (25–34%, 42–62%) was seen for hard clams and sunrays, respectively. Survival was not affected by feeding the partial replacement diets; however, the growth of sunrays was negatively affected (32–38% decrease) compared with live microalgae controls. Clam tissue FA profiles generally reflected the FA profiles of the dietary treatment fed, yet production was decreased with complete replacement diets, suggesting nonnutritional factors as the cause for the poorer performance seen. These results suggest that a live microalgal diet may be able to be sufficiently replaced with up to 50% of the microalgae concentrates tested without affecting the production of hard clams. For both post set hard clams and sunrays, production will be decreased if the two concentrates used in this study are utilized exclusively.","PeriodicalId":50053,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shellfish Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shellfish Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2983/035.042.0303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Owing to the high cost of microalgal production for bivalve culture, a need for alternatives to live microalgal diets exists, particularly in facilities where space and personnel required for live microalgal culture are limited. This study examined the feasibility of utilizing commercially available microalgal concentrates in place of or in addition to live microalgae as a feed for post set northern quahogs (= hard clams), Mercenaria mercenaria and sunray Venus clams, Macrocallista nimbosa. Clams were fed one of six dietary treatments for 6 wk, and growth, survival, and fatty acid (FA) profiles were evaluated. Treatments included two live microalgal diets Tisochrysis lutea and T. lutea + Chaetoceros neogracile, which served as controls for complete or partial replacements with two commercially available concentrate products, ISO 1800 and Shellfish Diet 1800. The production of both clam species was negatively impacted compared with the live microalgae controls when only concentrates were fed. Survival decreased by 29–33% for hard clams and 42–62% for sunrays; a similar decrease in the growth rate (25–34%, 42–62%) was seen for hard clams and sunrays, respectively. Survival was not affected by feeding the partial replacement diets; however, the growth of sunrays was negatively affected (32–38% decrease) compared with live microalgae controls. Clam tissue FA profiles generally reflected the FA profiles of the dietary treatment fed, yet production was decreased with complete replacement diets, suggesting nonnutritional factors as the cause for the poorer performance seen. These results suggest that a live microalgal diet may be able to be sufficiently replaced with up to 50% of the microalgae concentrates tested without affecting the production of hard clams. For both post set hard clams and sunrays, production will be decreased if the two concentrates used in this study are utilized exclusively.
用微藻类浓缩物生产北方鲗鱼(Mercenaria mercenaria)和日光金星蛤(Macrocallista nimbosa)的可行性
摘要 由于双壳贝类养殖用微藻类生产成本高昂,因此需要活体微藻类饲料的替代品,特别是在活体微藻类养殖空间和人员有限的设施中。本研究考察了利用市售浓缩微藻代替或添加活微藻作为北魁(=硬蛤)和日光金星蛤(Macrocallista nimbosa)的饲料的可行性。对蛤蜊进行为期 6 周的六种食物处理之一的喂养,并对其生长、存活率和脂肪酸(FA)概况进行评估。处理包括两种活的微藻日粮 Tisochrysis lutea 和 T. lutea + Chaetoceros neogracile,作为完全或部分替代两种市售浓缩产品 ISO 1800 和 Shellfish Diet 1800 的对照组。与只投喂精料的活微藻对照组相比,两种蛤蜊的产量都受到了负面影响。硬蛤的存活率下降了 29-33%,日光浴蛤的存活率下降了 42-62%;硬蛤和日光浴蛤的生长率也分别下降了 25-34%和 42-62%。与活的微藻对照组相比,部分替代日粮不影响存活率,但对太阳鱼的生长有负面影响(下降 32-38%)。蛤蜊组织的脂肪酸谱总体上反映了所投喂的日粮的脂肪酸谱,但完全替代日粮的产量却下降了,这表明非营养因素是导致表现较差的原因。这些结果表明,在不影响硬蛤产量的情况下,可以用多达 50%的微藻浓缩物充分替代活的微藻日粮。如果只使用本研究中使用的两种浓缩物,那么后定硬蛤和日光浴硬蛤的产量都会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Shellfish Research
Journal of Shellfish Research 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Original articles dealing with all aspects of shellfish research will be considered for publication. Manuscripts will be judged by the editors or other competent reviewers, or both, on the basis of originality, content, merit, clarity of presentation, and interpretations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信