Alone as a drop, together as an ocean: Corporate political activity in cooperatives

IF 1.2 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lana, M. Gama, Rosilene Marcon
{"title":"Alone as a drop, together as an ocean: Corporate political activity in cooperatives","authors":"Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lana, M. Gama, Rosilene Marcon","doi":"10.1177/03063070231225600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cooperatives are formed by the collective efforts of various actors pursuing common goals, enabling competition with stronger rivals. In Brazil, there is a strong relationship between agricultural cooperatives and politics, with their involvement focused on competing for regulations, information, and access to capital. However, little is known about the effects of this involvement. In this paper, we draw on collective action theory to investigate the individual and collective corporate political activities adopted by Brazilian agricultural cooperatives. Corporate political activity (CPAs) are a subfield of nonmarket strategy (NMS) that addresses actions firms develop outside the market arena to improve their outcomes and achieve competitive advantage. This study focuses on CPAs of Brazilian agricultural cooperatives, which account for over 48% of national agricultural production. We argue that collective CPAs are more effective for these cooperatives, as they enhance their representativeness and legitimacy, facilitating access to capital. To support our argument, we conducted a quantitative study using panel data from 394 Brazilian agricultural cooperatives. The results demonstrate the significance of collective CPA for accessing financing from the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) and contributing to collective action theory by offering a political perspective. Moreover, the study enriches CPA literature by identifying two innovative collective CPA tactics: affiliation with central cooperatives and the Organization of Brazilian Cooperatives (OCB). Lastly, the study highlights the importance of cooperation for individual and collective outcomes in practical settings.","PeriodicalId":46142,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","volume":"4 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GENERAL MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070231225600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cooperatives are formed by the collective efforts of various actors pursuing common goals, enabling competition with stronger rivals. In Brazil, there is a strong relationship between agricultural cooperatives and politics, with their involvement focused on competing for regulations, information, and access to capital. However, little is known about the effects of this involvement. In this paper, we draw on collective action theory to investigate the individual and collective corporate political activities adopted by Brazilian agricultural cooperatives. Corporate political activity (CPAs) are a subfield of nonmarket strategy (NMS) that addresses actions firms develop outside the market arena to improve their outcomes and achieve competitive advantage. This study focuses on CPAs of Brazilian agricultural cooperatives, which account for over 48% of national agricultural production. We argue that collective CPAs are more effective for these cooperatives, as they enhance their representativeness and legitimacy, facilitating access to capital. To support our argument, we conducted a quantitative study using panel data from 394 Brazilian agricultural cooperatives. The results demonstrate the significance of collective CPA for accessing financing from the Brazilian Development Bank (BNDES) and contributing to collective action theory by offering a political perspective. Moreover, the study enriches CPA literature by identifying two innovative collective CPA tactics: affiliation with central cooperatives and the Organization of Brazilian Cooperatives (OCB). Lastly, the study highlights the importance of cooperation for individual and collective outcomes in practical settings.
聚沙成塔,集腋成裘:合作社中的企业政治活动
合作社是由追求共同目标的不同参与者集体努力形成的,从而能够与更强大的对手竞争。在巴西,农业合作社与政治关系密切,其参与的重点是争夺法规、信息和资本。然而,人们对这种参与的效果知之甚少。在本文中,我们借鉴集体行动理论,研究巴西农业合作社采取的个人和集体企业政治活动。企业政治活动(CPA)是非市场策略(NMS)的一个子领域,涉及企业在市场领域之外为改善其成果和实现竞争优势而采取的行动。本研究侧重于巴西农业合作社的 CPA,这些合作社占全国农业生产的 48% 以上。我们认为,集体 CPA 对这些合作社来说更为有效,因为它们增强了合作社的代表性和合法性,有利于合作社获得资本。为了支持我们的论点,我们利用巴西 394 家农业合作社的面板数据开展了一项定量研究。研究结果表明,集体 CPA 对于从巴西开发银行 (BNDES) 获得融资具有重要意义,并通过提供政治视角为集体行动理论做出了贡献。此外,研究还发现了两种创新的集体 CPA 战术:与中央合作社的附属关系和巴西合作社组织 (OCB),从而丰富了 CPA 文献。最后,本研究强调了在实际环境中合作对个人和集体成果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Journal of General Management is quarterly peer reviewed journal, with a mission to provide thought leadership by publishing articles on managerial practices with organisation-wide or cross-functional implications. We seek original theoretical and practical insights into general management in all types of organisations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信