Socio-political and Structural Aspects of the Concept of Social Entrepreneurship: The Case of Serbia

Miloš Zarić
{"title":"Socio-political and Structural Aspects of the Concept of Social Entrepreneurship: The Case of Serbia","authors":"Miloš Zarić","doi":"10.21301/eap.v18i4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this research are the ways of conceptualizing the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship, which in transitional and developed capitalist societies alike, rely on cognitive models shaped by divergent cultural and socio-political contexts. To be more specific, these cognitive models emerge from different theoretical concepts of social entrepreneurship, as well as from contextually different ways of combining the invariant, structural elements of the concept, both of which are dialectically positioned within the neoliberal capitalism ideology discourse. Within the interaction among the elements constituting the structure of the concept of social entrepreneurship (such as social innovation, civic collectivism, an employment of members of marginalized social groups) and the overall neoliberal ideology discourse, which on its own behalf, operates in accordance with certain logical rules as any other discursive formation does, numerous contradictions and paradoxes emerge. The first chapter of this study critically examines the role of social entrepreneurship within the neoliberal capitalism framework through a comparative analysis with philanthropic endeavors and commercial (traditional, profit-oriented) entrepreneurship, as well as by comparing the diverse ways in which this phenomenon is defined in various socio-political contexts. The process of establishing the social entrepreneurship sector in Serbia, initiated in the post-2008 period reached its normative conclusion with the enactment of a unified law regulating this entrepreneurial activity in 2022. However, it remains incomplete both in terms of the cultural conceptualization of the phenomenon and its practical implementation perspective. This assumption is further examined in the second chapter of this paper in relation to the ideas regarding the social and political cultural heritage legacy, constructed by both policy makers and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) engaged in the social protection system which, on their behalf, during the specified period assume the role of social entrepreneurship promoters and emerge as primary contributors to its development. In the third chapter of this study, an exploration of the conditions and operationalization possibilities of key elements within the social entrepreneurship concept is undertaken. This analysis is illustrated through the services provided to the elderly citizens, which provides a framework for developing the thesis on the incomplete process of establishing the social entrepreneurship sector. Subsequently, the fourth and concluding chapter contextualizes these findings within the processes of constructing social issues pertaining aging and unemployment. In addition to drawing the attention to the distinct characteristics and the potential of social entrepreneurship, this research seeks to initiate a discussion focused on exploring possibilities of overcoming the predominantly constraining conditions and factors that influence the further development of this type of entrepreneurial activity within the transitional Serbian society.","PeriodicalId":515445,"journal":{"name":"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Etnoantropološki problemi / Issues in Ethnology and Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v18i4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus of this research are the ways of conceptualizing the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship, which in transitional and developed capitalist societies alike, rely on cognitive models shaped by divergent cultural and socio-political contexts. To be more specific, these cognitive models emerge from different theoretical concepts of social entrepreneurship, as well as from contextually different ways of combining the invariant, structural elements of the concept, both of which are dialectically positioned within the neoliberal capitalism ideology discourse. Within the interaction among the elements constituting the structure of the concept of social entrepreneurship (such as social innovation, civic collectivism, an employment of members of marginalized social groups) and the overall neoliberal ideology discourse, which on its own behalf, operates in accordance with certain logical rules as any other discursive formation does, numerous contradictions and paradoxes emerge. The first chapter of this study critically examines the role of social entrepreneurship within the neoliberal capitalism framework through a comparative analysis with philanthropic endeavors and commercial (traditional, profit-oriented) entrepreneurship, as well as by comparing the diverse ways in which this phenomenon is defined in various socio-political contexts. The process of establishing the social entrepreneurship sector in Serbia, initiated in the post-2008 period reached its normative conclusion with the enactment of a unified law regulating this entrepreneurial activity in 2022. However, it remains incomplete both in terms of the cultural conceptualization of the phenomenon and its practical implementation perspective. This assumption is further examined in the second chapter of this paper in relation to the ideas regarding the social and political cultural heritage legacy, constructed by both policy makers and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) engaged in the social protection system which, on their behalf, during the specified period assume the role of social entrepreneurship promoters and emerge as primary contributors to its development. In the third chapter of this study, an exploration of the conditions and operationalization possibilities of key elements within the social entrepreneurship concept is undertaken. This analysis is illustrated through the services provided to the elderly citizens, which provides a framework for developing the thesis on the incomplete process of establishing the social entrepreneurship sector. Subsequently, the fourth and concluding chapter contextualizes these findings within the processes of constructing social issues pertaining aging and unemployment. In addition to drawing the attention to the distinct characteristics and the potential of social entrepreneurship, this research seeks to initiate a discussion focused on exploring possibilities of overcoming the predominantly constraining conditions and factors that influence the further development of this type of entrepreneurial activity within the transitional Serbian society.
社会企业家概念的社会政治和结构方面:塞尔维亚案例
本研究的重点是社会创业现象的概念化方式,无论是在转型社会还是发达资本主义社会,这 些概念化方式都依赖于不同文化和社会政治背景下形成的认知模式。更具体地说,这些认知模式产生于不同的社会创业理论概念,以及不同背景下对这一概念中不变的结构性要素的不同组合方式,二者在新自由资本主义意识形态话语中处于辩证地位。构成社会创业概念结构的要素(如社会创新、公民集体主义、边缘化社会群体成员的就业)与整体新自由主义意识形态话语之间相互作用,出现了许多矛盾和悖论。本研究的第一章通过与慈善事业和商业(传统的、以利润为导向的)创业的比较分析,以及通过比较这一现象在不同社会政治背景下的不同定义方式,批判性地研究了社会创业在新自由主义资本主义框架中的作用。塞尔维亚在 2008 年后启动的建立社会创业部门的进程,随着 2022 年颁布规范这一创业活动的统一法律而进入规范化阶段。然而,无论是从社会创业现象的文化概念,还是从其实际实施的角度来看,它都是不完整的。在本文第二章中,我们将结合社会和政治文化遗产遗产的相关观点,对这一假设进行进一步研究,这些遗产是由政策制定者和参与社会保护体系的非政府组织(NGO)共同构建的,他们在特定时期代表自己承担了社会创业推动者的角色,并成为社会创业发展的主要贡献者。本研究的第三章探讨了社会创业概念中关键要素的条件和可操作性。这一分析通过为老年公民提供的服务进行说明,为论文中关于建立社会创业部门的不完整过程提供了一个框架。随后,第四章也是总结性的一章将这些发现与构建有关老龄化和失业的社会问题的过程联系起来。除了提请人们注意社会创业的显著特点和潜力外,本研究还试图发起一场讨论,重点探 讨克服主要制约条件和因素的可能性,这些条件和因素影响了转型期塞尔维亚社会中这类 创业活动的进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信