An Assessment of the Environmental Sustainability of Beef Production in Canada

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Isaac Asante Aboagye, Gayathri Valappil, Baishali Dutta, Hugues Imbeault-Tétreault, K. Ominski, Marcos Cordeiro, R. Kröbel, S. Pogue, T. A. McAllister
{"title":"An Assessment of the Environmental Sustainability of Beef Production in Canada","authors":"Isaac Asante Aboagye, Gayathri Valappil, Baishali Dutta, Hugues Imbeault-Tétreault, K. Ominski, Marcos Cordeiro, R. Kröbel, S. Pogue, T. A. McAllister","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2023-0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assessed the environmental impacts of beef cattle production and their effects on the overall sustainability of Canadian beef production. Cradle to farm gate, cradle to processor’s gate, and cradle to consumer plate life cycle assessments were carried out to quantify greenhouse gases (GHG), resource use (i.e., water, land, and fuel), and potential water and air pollution (i.e., freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification and photochemical oxidants formation). Across the production chain, feed production had the greatest impact on most environmental indicators. The GHG intensity without dairy meat was estimated as 10.4 kg CO2-eq/kg live weight (LW), corresponding to 32.8 kg CO2-eq/kg consumed boneless beef. Including dairy meat reduced GHG intensity by 5.8% (0.6 kg CO2-eq/kg LW) compared to when it was excluded. Other environmental metrics per kg of LW were 657 L, 38.7 m2 annual crop-eq, 0.4 kg oil-eq, 2.6 kg P-eq, 115.9 kg SO2-eq, and 8.7 kg NOx-eq for water use, land use, fossil fuel use, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, and photochemical oxidants, respectively. Data provide benchmarks for use in future regional and national assessments that are designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable management practices that can lower the environmental footprint of Canadian beef production.","PeriodicalId":9512,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","volume":"50 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2023-0077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the environmental impacts of beef cattle production and their effects on the overall sustainability of Canadian beef production. Cradle to farm gate, cradle to processor’s gate, and cradle to consumer plate life cycle assessments were carried out to quantify greenhouse gases (GHG), resource use (i.e., water, land, and fuel), and potential water and air pollution (i.e., freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification and photochemical oxidants formation). Across the production chain, feed production had the greatest impact on most environmental indicators. The GHG intensity without dairy meat was estimated as 10.4 kg CO2-eq/kg live weight (LW), corresponding to 32.8 kg CO2-eq/kg consumed boneless beef. Including dairy meat reduced GHG intensity by 5.8% (0.6 kg CO2-eq/kg LW) compared to when it was excluded. Other environmental metrics per kg of LW were 657 L, 38.7 m2 annual crop-eq, 0.4 kg oil-eq, 2.6 kg P-eq, 115.9 kg SO2-eq, and 8.7 kg NOx-eq for water use, land use, fossil fuel use, freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, and photochemical oxidants, respectively. Data provide benchmarks for use in future regional and national assessments that are designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable management practices that can lower the environmental footprint of Canadian beef production.
加拿大牛肉生产的环境可持续性评估
这项研究评估了肉牛生产对环境的影响及其对加拿大牛肉生产整体可持续性的影响。研究人员对 "从摇篮到农场入口"、"从摇篮到加工者入口 "和 "从摇篮到消费者餐桌 "的生命周期进行了评估,以量化温室气体(GHG)、资源使用(即水、土地和燃料)以及潜在的水和空气污染(即淡水富营养化、陆地酸化和光化学氧化剂的形成)。在整个生产链中,饲料生产对大多数环境指标的影响最大。据估计,不含乳肉的温室气体强度为 10.4 千克二氧化碳当量/千克活重(LW),相当于 32.8 千克二氧化碳当量/千克去骨牛肉。与不含乳肉的情况相比,含乳肉的温室气体强度降低了 5.8%(0.6 千克二氧化碳当量/千克活重)。每千克净重的其他环境指标分别为 657 升、38.7 平方米年作物当量、0.4 千克石油当量、2.6 千克磷当量、115.9 千克二氧化硫当量和 8.7 千克氮氧化物当量,涉及水利用、土地利用、化石燃料利用、淡水富营养化、陆地酸化和光化学氧化剂。数据为未来的地区和国家评估提供了基准,这些评估旨在鼓励采用可降低加拿大牛肉生产环境足迹的可持续管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Canadian Journal of Animal Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1957, this quarterly journal contains new research on all aspects of animal agriculture and animal products, including breeding and genetics; cellular and molecular biology; growth and development; meat science; modelling animal systems; physiology and endocrinology; ruminant nutrition; non-ruminant nutrition; and welfare, behaviour, and management. It also publishes reviews, letters to the editor, abstracts of technical papers presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society of Animal Science, and occasionally conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信