Sediment yield assessment and suggesting mitigation measures—A case study of Deme watershed, Omo‐Gibe Basin, Ethiopia

Eyasu Tafese Mekuria, S. D. Derib, Eyosias Agalu Melesse
{"title":"Sediment yield assessment and suggesting mitigation measures—A case study of Deme watershed, Omo‐Gibe Basin, Ethiopia","authors":"Eyasu Tafese Mekuria, S. D. Derib, Eyosias Agalu Melesse","doi":"10.1002/wwp2.12159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil erosion is a big challenge of natural resource development in Ethiopia due to the high expansion of agricultural activity and poor land‐use management. Deme watershed is one of the watersheds found in the Omo‐Gibe Basin, Ethiopia with soil erosion problems. It covers 1284.4 km2. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) integrated with ArcGIS was used to assess the sediment yield of the Deme watershed and develop mitigation measures for soil erosion. The purpose of this study was to assess the sediment yield and provide mitigation measures for the Deme watershed. Ground Control Point (GCP) data collection and field observation were conducted for land‐use land cover classification. The performance of the model was evaluated by coefficient of determination (R2), Nash Sutcliffe simulation efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBIAS). SWAT adequately reproduced the observed daily flows and sediment loads temporal evolution with R2 and NSE ≥ .7 and PBIAS < 15% both for the calibration and validation periods. The sediment‐rating curve measured an annual average suspended sediment yield of 12.79 tons per hectare per year, whereas the SWAT model predicted an annual average sediment yield of 14.35 tons per hectare per year. The spatial distribution map of sediment showed that 9 out of 17 sub‐watersheds generate a higher amount of sediment yield (15.1–45 tons/h/year) and are found to be erosion‐prone areas. For proper management of watershed terracing, filter strips, contouring, and reforestation scenarios were developed. Each scenario reduces the sediment yield by 74.29%, 58.34%, 47.78%, and 69.76%, respectively. The proper combination of these scenarios resulted in a 90% reduction in sediment yield. Policymakers and land‐use planners of different organization will benefit from this research by implementing soil and water conservation mechanisms and practices that strengthen and mitigate the natural systems of Deme watershed.","PeriodicalId":285503,"journal":{"name":"World Water Policy","volume":"78 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Water Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wwp2.12159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil erosion is a big challenge of natural resource development in Ethiopia due to the high expansion of agricultural activity and poor land‐use management. Deme watershed is one of the watersheds found in the Omo‐Gibe Basin, Ethiopia with soil erosion problems. It covers 1284.4 km2. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) integrated with ArcGIS was used to assess the sediment yield of the Deme watershed and develop mitigation measures for soil erosion. The purpose of this study was to assess the sediment yield and provide mitigation measures for the Deme watershed. Ground Control Point (GCP) data collection and field observation were conducted for land‐use land cover classification. The performance of the model was evaluated by coefficient of determination (R2), Nash Sutcliffe simulation efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBIAS). SWAT adequately reproduced the observed daily flows and sediment loads temporal evolution with R2 and NSE ≥ .7 and PBIAS < 15% both for the calibration and validation periods. The sediment‐rating curve measured an annual average suspended sediment yield of 12.79 tons per hectare per year, whereas the SWAT model predicted an annual average sediment yield of 14.35 tons per hectare per year. The spatial distribution map of sediment showed that 9 out of 17 sub‐watersheds generate a higher amount of sediment yield (15.1–45 tons/h/year) and are found to be erosion‐prone areas. For proper management of watershed terracing, filter strips, contouring, and reforestation scenarios were developed. Each scenario reduces the sediment yield by 74.29%, 58.34%, 47.78%, and 69.76%, respectively. The proper combination of these scenarios resulted in a 90% reduction in sediment yield. Policymakers and land‐use planners of different organization will benefit from this research by implementing soil and water conservation mechanisms and practices that strengthen and mitigate the natural systems of Deme watershed.
沉积物产量评估与减缓措施建议--埃塞俄比亚奥莫-吉贝盆地 Deme 流域案例研究
由于农业活动高度扩张和土地使用管理不善,水土流失是埃塞俄比亚自然资源开发面临的一大挑战。Deme 流域是埃塞俄比亚奥莫-吉贝盆地存在水土流失问题的流域之一。流域面积为 1284.4 平方公里。水土评估工具 (SWAT) 与 ArcGIS 集成用于评估 Deme 流域的沉积物产量,并制定水土流失缓解措施。本研究的目的是评估 Deme 流域的泥沙产量,并提供缓解措施。为进行土地利用土地覆被分类,进行了地面控制点(GCP)数据收集和实地观测。通过判定系数(R2)、纳什-苏克里夫模拟效率(NSE)和偏差百分比(PBIAS)对模型的性能进行了评估。SWAT 模型充分再现了观测到的日流量和泥沙负荷的时间演变,校准期和验证期的 R2 和 NSE 均≥ 0.7,PBIAS 均小于 15%。泥沙分级曲线测得的年均悬浮泥沙量为 12.79 吨/公顷/年,而 SWAT 模型预测的年均泥沙量为 14.35 吨/公顷/年。泥沙空间分布图显示,在 17 个子流域中,有 9 个子流域的泥沙产量较高(15.1-45 吨/小时/年),属于水土流失易发区。为了对流域进行适当管理,制定了梯田、过滤带、等高线和植树造林方案。每种方案可分别减少 74.29%、58.34%、47.78% 和 69.76% 的泥沙产量。这些方案的适当组合可使泥沙产量减少 90%。不同组织的决策者和土地利用规划者将从这项研究中受益,实施水土保持机制和实践,加强和缓解 Deme 流域的自然系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信