Maternal contact and positive human interactions during lactation impacts piglet performance and behaviour during lactation

K. Tomas, Jemma Savaglia, K. J. Plush, Darryl N. D’Souza, K. Butler, P. Hemsworth, A. Tilbrook
{"title":"Maternal contact and positive human interactions during lactation impacts piglet performance and behaviour during lactation","authors":"K. Tomas, Jemma Savaglia, K. J. Plush, Darryl N. D’Souza, K. Butler, P. Hemsworth, A. Tilbrook","doi":"10.3389/fanim.2023.1289518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early life interactions with the sow or humans can have lifelong consequences on welfare and performance in pigs. It was hypothesised that piglets that received increased maternal contact and positive human contact would display improved responses to stressful events and improved performance.Ninety-eight litters were allocated to a 2 x 2 factorial design for maternal contact (MC+)/restricted maternal contact (MC-); and positive human contact (HC+)/no additional human contact (HC-). Modified farrowing crates were used to restrict maternal contact (MC-) and litters in the HC+ treatment received five minutes of daily positive human interaction (stroking). Behavioural and physiological responses were assessed during processing at three days of age and during a behaviour test in which piglets were introduced to an empty arena, novel object, human hand and human standing in the arena at 18 days of age. Observations of behaviour in the home pen and growth and survival of piglets to weaning were also assessed.At processing, MC- piglets had more squeals (P = 0.015), tended to have more grunts (P = 0.063) and struggle attempts (P = 0.079), and had increased plasma cortisol concentrations (P = 0.009) after processing than MC+ piglets. During the behaviour test, HC+ piglets were more active (P = 0.014) and had more vocalisations (P < 0.05) in the empty arena than HC piglets. Furthermore, HC+ piglets were more likely to approach a human standing in the arena (P = 0.006) than HC- piglets. MC- piglets were less active (P = 0.008) and were less likely to approach the novel object (P = 0.049) than MC+ piglets. MC+ piglets tended to have higher weaning weights (P = 0.055) and more MC+ piglets were successfully weaned (P = 0.022) than MC- piglets. There was no significant effect of HC on piglet performance.While positive handling did not affect behavioural and physiological stress response to processing, HC+ reduced fear of novelty and humans. These findings highlight the importance of early life experiences has on stress resilience early in life.","PeriodicalId":503755,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Animal Science","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1289518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early life interactions with the sow or humans can have lifelong consequences on welfare and performance in pigs. It was hypothesised that piglets that received increased maternal contact and positive human contact would display improved responses to stressful events and improved performance.Ninety-eight litters were allocated to a 2 x 2 factorial design for maternal contact (MC+)/restricted maternal contact (MC-); and positive human contact (HC+)/no additional human contact (HC-). Modified farrowing crates were used to restrict maternal contact (MC-) and litters in the HC+ treatment received five minutes of daily positive human interaction (stroking). Behavioural and physiological responses were assessed during processing at three days of age and during a behaviour test in which piglets were introduced to an empty arena, novel object, human hand and human standing in the arena at 18 days of age. Observations of behaviour in the home pen and growth and survival of piglets to weaning were also assessed.At processing, MC- piglets had more squeals (P = 0.015), tended to have more grunts (P = 0.063) and struggle attempts (P = 0.079), and had increased plasma cortisol concentrations (P = 0.009) after processing than MC+ piglets. During the behaviour test, HC+ piglets were more active (P = 0.014) and had more vocalisations (P < 0.05) in the empty arena than HC piglets. Furthermore, HC+ piglets were more likely to approach a human standing in the arena (P = 0.006) than HC- piglets. MC- piglets were less active (P = 0.008) and were less likely to approach the novel object (P = 0.049) than MC+ piglets. MC+ piglets tended to have higher weaning weights (P = 0.055) and more MC+ piglets were successfully weaned (P = 0.022) than MC- piglets. There was no significant effect of HC on piglet performance.While positive handling did not affect behavioural and physiological stress response to processing, HC+ reduced fear of novelty and humans. These findings highlight the importance of early life experiences has on stress resilience early in life.
哺乳期母性接触和积极的人际互动影响哺乳期仔猪的表现和行为
早期与母猪或人类的互动会对猪的福利和生产性能产生终生影响。我们假设,增加母性接触和与人积极接触的仔猪对应激事件的反应会有所改善,其生产性能也会有所提高。改良产仔箱用于限制母性接触(MC-),HC+ 处理中的仔猪每天接受 5 分钟的积极人际互动(抚摸)。在三日龄时的处理过程中以及在 18 日龄时的行为测试过程中,对仔猪的行为和生理反应进行了评估,在行为测试中,将仔猪引入空场、新物体、人的手以及站在场内的人。在加工过程中,与 MC+ 仔猪相比,MC- 仔猪发出更多的尖叫声(P = 0.015),发出更多的咕噜声(P = 0.063)和尝试挣扎(P = 0.079),加工后血浆皮质醇浓度升高(P = 0.009)。在行为测试中,HC+仔猪比HC仔猪更活跃(P = 0.014),在空场中的发声次数也更多(P < 0.05)。此外,HC+仔猪比 HC- 仔猪更容易接近站在场内的人类(P = 0.006)。与 MC+ 仔猪相比,MC- 仔猪不那么活跃(P = 0.008),接近新物体的可能性也较小(P = 0.049)。与 MC- 仔猪相比,MC+ 仔猪的断奶体重往往更高(P = 0.055),成功断奶的 MC+ 仔猪更多(P = 0.022)。虽然积极的处理方式不会影响仔猪对处理过程的行为和生理应激反应,但HC+会减少仔猪对新奇事物和人类的恐惧。这些发现凸显了早期生活经历对生命早期应激恢复能力的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信