Adoption mode of agricultural machinery and food productivity: evidence from China

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Suhao Wei, Yan Lu
{"title":"Adoption mode of agricultural machinery and food productivity: evidence from China","authors":"Suhao Wei, Yan Lu","doi":"10.3389/fsufs.2023.1257918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many researchers argue that the adoption of agricultural mechanization services (AMSs) is an important way for smallholder farmers in China to engage in modern agricultural production. However, the impact of the adoption mode of agricultural machinery on food productivity remains under-analyzed. We investigate the links between the adoption mode of agricultural machinery and food productivity using data on 795 grain farmers collected from the North China Plain. The results indicate that, compared with service outsourcing (SO), self-purchase (SP) improves the technical efficiency of farms; however, it reduces the input efficiency of agricultural machinery. The channel of the effect is that, although SO can reduce the redundancy of agricultural machinery's input, the opportunistic behavior of AMS suppliers and labor supervision problems lead to a decline in agricultural machinery's operation quality. The impact of the adoption mode of agricultural machinery on food productivity is asymmetrical among different types of farmers. Large-scale and professional farmers benefit more from SP, whereas small-scale and part-time farmers benefit more from SO. The AMS is not perfect, and the Chinese government should pay close attention to the loss of technical efficiency in agricultural production caused by the opportunistic behavior of AMS suppliers. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the agricultural machinery subsidy policy and reduce the transaction cost of AMS.","PeriodicalId":36666,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","volume":"11 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1257918","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many researchers argue that the adoption of agricultural mechanization services (AMSs) is an important way for smallholder farmers in China to engage in modern agricultural production. However, the impact of the adoption mode of agricultural machinery on food productivity remains under-analyzed. We investigate the links between the adoption mode of agricultural machinery and food productivity using data on 795 grain farmers collected from the North China Plain. The results indicate that, compared with service outsourcing (SO), self-purchase (SP) improves the technical efficiency of farms; however, it reduces the input efficiency of agricultural machinery. The channel of the effect is that, although SO can reduce the redundancy of agricultural machinery's input, the opportunistic behavior of AMS suppliers and labor supervision problems lead to a decline in agricultural machinery's operation quality. The impact of the adoption mode of agricultural machinery on food productivity is asymmetrical among different types of farmers. Large-scale and professional farmers benefit more from SP, whereas small-scale and part-time farmers benefit more from SO. The AMS is not perfect, and the Chinese government should pay close attention to the loss of technical efficiency in agricultural production caused by the opportunistic behavior of AMS suppliers. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the agricultural machinery subsidy policy and reduce the transaction cost of AMS.
农业机械的采用模式与粮食生产率:来自中国的证据
许多研究人员认为,采用农业机械化服务(AMS)是中国小农户从事现代农业生产的重要途径。然而,农业机械采用模式对粮食生产率的影响仍未得到充分分析。我们利用从华北平原收集到的 795 位种粮大户的数据,研究了农业机械采用模式与粮食生产率之间的联系。结果表明,与服务外包(SO)相比,自购(SP)提高了农场的技术效率,但降低了农业机械的投入效率。其影响渠道是,虽然服务外包可以减少农机投入的冗余,但农机服务供应商的机会主义行为和劳动力监管问题导致了农机作业质量的下降。农机采用模式对粮食生产率的影响在不同类型的农户之间是不对称的。大规模农户和专业农户从 SP 中获益更多,而小规模农户和兼业农户从 SO 中获益更多。农机服务并非完美无缺,中国政府应密切关注农机服务供应商的机会主义行为对农业生产造成的技术效率损失。因此,有必要调整农机补贴政策,降低 AMS 的交易成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Horticulture
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.40%
发文量
575
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信