ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE REMOTE TEAMWORK

Emilija Krukauskaitė, L. Jesevičiūtė-Ufartienė
{"title":"ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE REMOTE TEAMWORK","authors":"Emilija Krukauskaitė, L. Jesevičiūtė-Ufartienė","doi":"10.3846/mla.2024.19850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote teamwork has become common during the pandemic and continues even after it is over. In Lithuania alone, during the pandemic, around 40% of employees worked or still work remotely, while in the US this number reaches 50%. The purpose of this article is to compare the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of remote teamwork presented by scientists with the opinion of experts. Several main factors were selected after literature analysis and were given to the experts to evaluate them in a survey which was created using Likert scale. Experts were selected from one financial company and they lead teams of 7–10 people and have been working remotely for the past two years. The obtained results were evaluated using Kendall’s concordance coefficient and factor analysis methods. These methods helped evaluate the compatibility of the experts’ opinions and factors were divided into advantages and disadvantages based on the experts’ evaluations. The theoretical and practical assessment of the advantages of remote teamwork showed that the opinions of scientists and experts differ. This research can help remote teams and their managers to find what they can improve.","PeriodicalId":509183,"journal":{"name":"Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis","volume":"11 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mokslas - Lietuvos ateitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mla.2024.19850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Remote teamwork has become common during the pandemic and continues even after it is over. In Lithuania alone, during the pandemic, around 40% of employees worked or still work remotely, while in the US this number reaches 50%. The purpose of this article is to compare the theoretical advantages and disadvantages of remote teamwork presented by scientists with the opinion of experts. Several main factors were selected after literature analysis and were given to the experts to evaluate them in a survey which was created using Likert scale. Experts were selected from one financial company and they lead teams of 7–10 people and have been working remotely for the past two years. The obtained results were evaluated using Kendall’s concordance coefficient and factor analysis methods. These methods helped evaluate the compatibility of the experts’ opinions and factors were divided into advantages and disadvantages based on the experts’ evaluations. The theoretical and practical assessment of the advantages of remote teamwork showed that the opinions of scientists and experts differ. This research can help remote teams and their managers to find what they can improve.
远程团队工作的优缺点
在大流行病期间,远程团队工作已成为一种普遍现象,甚至在大流行病结束后仍在继续。仅在立陶宛,大流行病期间就有约 40% 的员工从事或仍在从事远程工作,而在美国,这一数字达到了 50%。本文旨在比较科学家提出的远程团队工作的理论利弊和专家的意见。在对文献进行分析后,我们选择了几个主要因素,并通过利克特量表进行调查,让专家对这些因素进行评估。专家们从一家金融公司中选出,他们领导着 7-10 人的团队,在过去两年中一直从事远程工作。使用肯德尔一致系数和因素分析方法对所获得的结果进行了评估。这些方法有助于评估专家意见的兼容性,并根据专家的评价将因素分为优势和劣势。对远程团队合作优势的理论和实践评估表明,科学家和专家的观点各不相同。这项研究可以帮助远程团队及其管理者找到可以改进的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信