Doctor Patient Type of Language Used and Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence in Kibera Informal Settlement in Nairobi County, Kenya

Beatrice Koech, Geoffrey Sikolia, Nancy Macharia
{"title":"Doctor Patient Type of Language Used and Tuberculosis Treatment Adherence in Kibera Informal Settlement in Nairobi County, Kenya","authors":"Beatrice Koech, Geoffrey Sikolia, Nancy Macharia","doi":"10.47604/jhmn.2253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To explore the type of language used on tuberculosis treatment adherence in an informal settlement in Nairobi County, Kenya. \nMethodology: This was by a descriptive qualitative research design. The sample size was 67 and comprised 10 healthcare workers and 57 TB patients. Purposive sampling technique was used to sample the participants. The study conducted 37 unstructured in-depth interviews and 3 focus group discussions. Data analysis was conducted by first translating the data, then transcribing the verbatim of the in-depth unstructured interviews and focus group discussions. The transcribed data was later analyzed using thematic analysis. Data was presented using tables, bar charts and pie charts. \nFindings: The findings of the study indicated that majority of the tuberculosis patients found that the type of language used by the healthcare workers when communicating with them determined whether they would adhere to treatment or not. If the language used was not well understood by the patient or if the healthcare worker used complex language, then the patient was not likely to adhere to treatment. The findings further indicated that more than half of the patients were fluent in Swahili language while the remaining patients only had basic knowledge of the language. Sixty percent that is 34 of the participants were fluent in Swahili language whereas thirty- eight percent that is 22 patients had basic knowledge of the language, and one did not understand the language and opted to communicate with the help of an interpreter. Seventy percent that is 40 of the patients indicated that when the healthcare workers communicated with them in simple language they were more likely to adhere to TB treatment. Findings from the healthcare workers indicated that Swahili was the preferred language used by both the healthcare workers and the tuberculosis patients. If a patient did not understand Swahili language, the healthcare workers would look for an interpreter who would then translate to the patient the required information. The use of complex medical language was only used when the healthcare workers were communicating amongst themselves. \nUnique Contribution to Theory and Practice and Policy: The constructs of the theories informed the study in terms of treatment adherence by emphasizing the benefits of seeking healthcare early. On practice, healthcare workers needed to be aware of type of language used when interacting with their patients as they are likely to affect their patients’ adherence to treatment. Based on these findings, policymakers should ensure that all healthcare workers should use simple language that is, the use of plain common words to make it easier for the patients to understand. In addition, any health messages, appointment cards or any other TB information whether spoken or written meant for the patients, should be designed in a language that is simple for the patient to comprehend.","PeriodicalId":16078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47604/jhmn.2253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the type of language used on tuberculosis treatment adherence in an informal settlement in Nairobi County, Kenya. Methodology: This was by a descriptive qualitative research design. The sample size was 67 and comprised 10 healthcare workers and 57 TB patients. Purposive sampling technique was used to sample the participants. The study conducted 37 unstructured in-depth interviews and 3 focus group discussions. Data analysis was conducted by first translating the data, then transcribing the verbatim of the in-depth unstructured interviews and focus group discussions. The transcribed data was later analyzed using thematic analysis. Data was presented using tables, bar charts and pie charts. Findings: The findings of the study indicated that majority of the tuberculosis patients found that the type of language used by the healthcare workers when communicating with them determined whether they would adhere to treatment or not. If the language used was not well understood by the patient or if the healthcare worker used complex language, then the patient was not likely to adhere to treatment. The findings further indicated that more than half of the patients were fluent in Swahili language while the remaining patients only had basic knowledge of the language. Sixty percent that is 34 of the participants were fluent in Swahili language whereas thirty- eight percent that is 22 patients had basic knowledge of the language, and one did not understand the language and opted to communicate with the help of an interpreter. Seventy percent that is 40 of the patients indicated that when the healthcare workers communicated with them in simple language they were more likely to adhere to TB treatment. Findings from the healthcare workers indicated that Swahili was the preferred language used by both the healthcare workers and the tuberculosis patients. If a patient did not understand Swahili language, the healthcare workers would look for an interpreter who would then translate to the patient the required information. The use of complex medical language was only used when the healthcare workers were communicating amongst themselves. Unique Contribution to Theory and Practice and Policy: The constructs of the theories informed the study in terms of treatment adherence by emphasizing the benefits of seeking healthcare early. On practice, healthcare workers needed to be aware of type of language used when interacting with their patients as they are likely to affect their patients’ adherence to treatment. Based on these findings, policymakers should ensure that all healthcare workers should use simple language that is, the use of plain common words to make it easier for the patients to understand. In addition, any health messages, appointment cards or any other TB information whether spoken or written meant for the patients, should be designed in a language that is simple for the patient to comprehend.
肯尼亚内罗毕县基贝拉非正规定居点的医生、患者使用的语言类型与结核病治疗依从性
目的:探讨肯尼亚内罗毕县非正规居住区在坚持结核病治疗方面所使用的语言类型。研究方法:采用描述性定性研究设计。样本数量为 67 个,包括 10 名医护人员和 57 名结核病患者。研究采用了有目的抽样技术。研究进行了 37 次非结构化深度访谈和 3 次焦点小组讨论。在进行数据分析时,首先翻译数据,然后转录非结构化深入访谈和焦点小组讨论的逐字记录。随后采用专题分析法对誊写的数据进行分析。数据使用表格、条形图和饼图进行展示。研究结果研究结果表明,大多数肺结核患者认为,医护人员在与他们沟通时使用的语言类型决定了他们是否会坚持治疗。如果患者不能很好地理解所使用的语言,或者医护人员使用了复杂的语言,那么患者就不太可能坚持治疗。研究结果进一步表明,半数以上的患者能说流利的斯瓦希里语,而其余患者仅掌握基本的斯瓦希里语知识。60%的参与者(34 人)能说流利的斯瓦希里语,而 38%的患者(22 人)对斯瓦希里语有基本的了解,还有一人不懂斯瓦希里语,选择在翻译的帮助下进行交流。70%(即 40 名患者)表示,当医护人员用简单的语言与他们交流时,他们更有可能坚持结核病治疗。医护人员的调查结果表明,斯瓦希里语是医护人员和肺结核患者都喜欢使用的语言。如果病人不懂斯瓦希里语,医护人员会寻找翻译,然后由翻译向病人翻译所需的信息。只有在医护人员之间进行交流时,才会使用复杂的医学语言。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:通过强调及早寻求医疗保健的益处,这些理论的构建为本研究提供了坚持治疗方面的信息。在实践中,医护人员需要注意与患者交流时的语言类型,因为这些语言很可能会影响患者坚持治疗。根据这些研究结果,政策制定者应确保所有医护人员使用简单的语言,即使用普通的词语,使患者更容易理解。此外,任何面向患者的健康信息、预约卡或任何其他结核病信息,无论是口头的还是书面的,都应使用患者易于理解的语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信