On the Time-Dilation Paradox—Can it be Removed?

Martin Valldor
{"title":"On the Time-Dilation Paradox—Can it be Removed?","authors":"Martin Valldor","doi":"10.1142/s2529732524500020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In special relativity theory, the velocity of light is assumed to be constant, independent of the reference frame. This creates paradoxes when observations in different reference frames are compared. The so-called twin-paradox is based on a Gedanken experiment with identical twins, one traveling in a spaceship and one remaining on Earth. Due to the time-dilation effect, the traveling twin, when returning to Earth is younger than the other twin. This paradox has been tentatively resolved by inserting asymmetry, but the fully symmetrical twin-paradox remains within the relativity theory. However, if the light velocity, instead of being absolute, is taken to be relative, the paradox can be resolved. By reevaluating the light-clock experiment and performing various other Gedanken experiments, it becomes apparent that constant movement, independent of velocity, is the same as “at rest” for any one reference frame and does not need to involve any relativistic effects. This would make the Lorentz–Voigt factor void, and red- and blue-shifts of electromagnetic (EM) radiation can be explained as true changes in light-velocities. Based on thinking experiments, new rules for light-velocities are proposed, which also could explain anomalous observations regarding Jupiter’s moon Io’s movement. Gravity and its effect on light are examined, and it is argued that planetary lensing of light can be simply explained as refraction in a planet’s atmosphere or by diffraction on the planet itself. Further, the light pressure can resolve the indistinguishability principle. Alternatives to relativity explanations are suggested for several observations that nullify Fresnel dragging and oppose the existence of an aether medium. A modified Mach–Zehnder interferometer is proposed as an instrument for measuring sub-c and super-c velocities of EM-waves. The “old” relativity theories are replaced by a novel postulate that an applied force, leading to changes in velocity, is the reason for time-dilation: what may be called mechanical relativity. A mathematical suggestion of mechanical relativity is presented, along with discussions on connections between time, energy, and gravity.","PeriodicalId":32797,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Frontiers Journal","volume":"3 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Frontiers Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2529732524500020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In special relativity theory, the velocity of light is assumed to be constant, independent of the reference frame. This creates paradoxes when observations in different reference frames are compared. The so-called twin-paradox is based on a Gedanken experiment with identical twins, one traveling in a spaceship and one remaining on Earth. Due to the time-dilation effect, the traveling twin, when returning to Earth is younger than the other twin. This paradox has been tentatively resolved by inserting asymmetry, but the fully symmetrical twin-paradox remains within the relativity theory. However, if the light velocity, instead of being absolute, is taken to be relative, the paradox can be resolved. By reevaluating the light-clock experiment and performing various other Gedanken experiments, it becomes apparent that constant movement, independent of velocity, is the same as “at rest” for any one reference frame and does not need to involve any relativistic effects. This would make the Lorentz–Voigt factor void, and red- and blue-shifts of electromagnetic (EM) radiation can be explained as true changes in light-velocities. Based on thinking experiments, new rules for light-velocities are proposed, which also could explain anomalous observations regarding Jupiter’s moon Io’s movement. Gravity and its effect on light are examined, and it is argued that planetary lensing of light can be simply explained as refraction in a planet’s atmosphere or by diffraction on the planet itself. Further, the light pressure can resolve the indistinguishability principle. Alternatives to relativity explanations are suggested for several observations that nullify Fresnel dragging and oppose the existence of an aether medium. A modified Mach–Zehnder interferometer is proposed as an instrument for measuring sub-c and super-c velocities of EM-waves. The “old” relativity theories are replaced by a novel postulate that an applied force, leading to changes in velocity, is the reason for time-dilation: what may be called mechanical relativity. A mathematical suggestion of mechanical relativity is presented, along with discussions on connections between time, energy, and gravity.
时间膨胀悖论--能否消除?
在狭义相对论中,光速被假定为常数,与参照系无关。当比较不同参照系下的观测结果时,这就产生了悖论。所谓的孪生悖论是基于一个同卵双胞胎的格丹肯实验,一个在宇宙飞船中旅行,一个留在地球上。由于时间膨胀效应,旅行中的双胞胎在返回地球时比另一对双胞胎年轻。这一悖论通过插入非对称性得到了初步解决,但完全对称的双胞胎悖论仍然存在于相对论中。然而,如果光速不是绝对的,而是相对的,那么悖论就可以得到解决。通过重新评估光钟实验和其他各种格登肯实验,我们可以发现,与速度无关的匀速运动对于任何一个参照系来说都等同于 "静止",不需要涉及任何相对论效应。这将使洛伦兹-伏依格特因子失效,电磁辐射的红移和蓝移可以解释为光速的真实变化。根据思考实验,提出了新的光速规则,这也可以解释有关木星卫星木卫一运动的异常观测。研究了重力及其对光的影响,认为行星对光的透镜作用可以简单地解释为行星大气层中的折射或行星本身的衍射。此外,光压可以解决不可分辨原理。对于一些使菲涅尔拖曳无效并反对存在乙醚介质的观测结果,提出了相对论解释的替代方案。提出了一种改进的马赫-泽恩德干涉仪,作为测量电磁波的亚 C 和超 C 速度的仪器。旧的 "相对论被一种新的假设所取代,即导致速度变化的外力是时间膨胀的原因:可称之为机械相对论。本文提出了机械相对论的数学建议,并讨论了时间、能量和重力之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信