Overlapping sustainable construction indicators for construction organisations in Zimbabwe

Tirivavi Moyo, Mazen Omer, Benviolent Chigara
{"title":"Overlapping sustainable construction indicators for construction organisations in Zimbabwe","authors":"Tirivavi Moyo, Mazen Omer, Benviolent Chigara","doi":"10.1108/jedt-04-2023-0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSustainable construction deficits are common in developing economies, and resolutions are constrained by the failure to prioritise the plethora of available indicators. This study aims to report on overlapping indicators for benchmarking sustainable construction for construction organisations.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nOnline survey data were collected from construction professionals, academics and senior managers in government bodies. Pearson chi-squared tests and overlapping analysis were used to determine significant indicators. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to determine statistically significant differences among the dimensions.\n\n\nFindings\nOverlapping analysis determined indicators significant for economic, environmental and social performance. Environmental protection and reporting (pollution and emissions) were significant for all three performance dimensions. The most significant indicators are economic performance (adequate competence of key project staff), environmental performance (environmental protection and reporting – pollution and emissions) and social performance (adequate sustainability expenditure by construction organisations). Significant differences due to dimensions existed for adequate competence of key project staff, sustainable construction and eco-design, adequate governance and organisational excellence of construction projects and satisfactory workers’ morale.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nDetermining overlapping indicators enables prioritised implementation that ensures sustainable construction. Excluding construction workers was a significant limitation for a holistic interrogation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to determine overlapping indicators for sustainable construction performance in Zimbabwe.\n","PeriodicalId":514531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-04-2023-0168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Sustainable construction deficits are common in developing economies, and resolutions are constrained by the failure to prioritise the plethora of available indicators. This study aims to report on overlapping indicators for benchmarking sustainable construction for construction organisations. Design/methodology/approach Online survey data were collected from construction professionals, academics and senior managers in government bodies. Pearson chi-squared tests and overlapping analysis were used to determine significant indicators. Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to determine statistically significant differences among the dimensions. Findings Overlapping analysis determined indicators significant for economic, environmental and social performance. Environmental protection and reporting (pollution and emissions) were significant for all three performance dimensions. The most significant indicators are economic performance (adequate competence of key project staff), environmental performance (environmental protection and reporting – pollution and emissions) and social performance (adequate sustainability expenditure by construction organisations). Significant differences due to dimensions existed for adequate competence of key project staff, sustainable construction and eco-design, adequate governance and organisational excellence of construction projects and satisfactory workers’ morale. Research limitations/implications Determining overlapping indicators enables prioritised implementation that ensures sustainable construction. Excluding construction workers was a significant limitation for a holistic interrogation. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to determine overlapping indicators for sustainable construction performance in Zimbabwe.
津巴布韦建筑组织的重叠可持续建筑指标
目的可持续建筑方面的不足在发展中经济体中很常见,而解决这些问题的方法却受制于未能对大量可用指标进行优先排序。本研究旨在报告建筑组织可持续建筑基准的重叠指标。设计/方法/途径从建筑专业人士、学者和政府机构高级管理人员处收集了在线调查数据。采用皮尔逊卡方检验和重叠分析来确定重要指标。研究结果重叠分析确定了对经济、环境和社会绩效具有重要意义的指标。环境保护和报告(污染和排放)对所有三个绩效维度都有意义。最重要的指标是经济绩效(主要项目人员的适当能力)、环境绩效(环境保护和报告--污染和排放)和社会绩效(施工组织的适当可持续发展支出)。在关键项目人员的适当能力、可持续建筑和生态设计、建筑项目的适当管理和组织卓越性以及令人满意的工人士气方面,存在着因维度而产生的显著差异。就作者所知,这是第一项确定津巴布韦可持续建筑绩效重叠指标的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信